Moderation Message : Avoid sending Scrambled Messages using formated texts

[Guest guest]

Dear members:

 

Most of you are using ascii texts while sending your messages and the messages

look clean and easily readable. But some of you continue to send 'formated

texts' which appear in the messages very messy and sometimes non-comprehensible.

The current set-up of the list is to accept text messages (ascii texts such as

the texts creating using a Notepad). One of the best way to achieve this is

develop the message in ascii text. The mailing system tries to convert the

html format into texts but there are some glitches in their transformation. This

is the reason for the scrambles that you see in the messages. We have provided

copies of several scrampled messages that recently appeared in the list.

 

Please make sure to read the messages that you post in the list and if you see

them with unintended symbols, check and and correct your future postings.

 

We appreciate your cooperation and understanding to keep the messages readable

for all which will help us all to read and understand what has been written.

 

Thanks again,

 

Advaitin List Moderators

 

advaitin , " void " <rgoteti wrote:

>

> M & #257;y & #257;

> M & #257;y & #257; (/m & #593; & #720;j & #593; & #720;/) According to Adi Shankara,

M & #257;y & #257; is the complex illusionary power of Brahman which causes the

Brahman to be seen as the material world of separate forms. Sankara says that

Maya is nothing other than ignorance and this in inherent in the thoughts which

are dualities . Maya has two main functions — one is to " hide " Brahman from

ordinary human perception, and the other is to present the material world in its

(Brahmam) place. M & #257;y & #257; is also said to be indescribable, though it may

be said that all sense data entering ones awareness via the five senses are

M & #257;y & #257;, since the fundamental reality

 

advaitin , " R.S.MANI " <r_s_mani wrote:

>

> Is the Lord itself not Mithya in the ultimate analysis, including the One

who does all such analysis?

> Is it not actually “Washing the baby with all care and attention and

throwing not only the washing water and the baby also?

> Just a silly doubt.

> Kind regards and Hari Om

 

advaitin , " void " <rgoteti wrote:

>

>

> > Nevertheless the presence of “I†shines always even in duality as

“prati bodha viditham†i.e. in each and every piece of knowledge or

awareness of any object it or “I†is also present and one just has to

recognize this fact, and also at the same time this “I†is also independent

of any objective knowledge as it is Knowledge itself pervading though all pieces

of knowledge.

> > I look forward to the learned vies of our members.

> > With kind regards and Hari Om