Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Proselytizing

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I wonder if any member can point me to some references in

the Upanishads, Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively

attempt to tell people about advaita unless they are ‘ready’ for

that knowledge and specifically looking for it. I’m sure I have come

across some words from Shankara to this effect but cannot immediately locate

them.SES (School of Economic Science, where I first heard about this teaching

long ago) always insisted that it was actually ‘dangerous’ to

impart this knowledge to those who were not yet ready.

 

Best wishes,

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Denni-ji

Pranams.

 

Lord Krishna in the Gita cautions about who this teaching should be imparted to and Bhagwan Shankara glosses as follows:

....now after that, the Lord states the rules for handing down the Scripture:

 

18:67. This (that I have taught) you should not ever be taught to one who is devoid of austerities and to one who is not a devotee; also, neither to one who does not render service, nor as well to one who cavils at Me.

 

 

Idam, this Scripture; which has been taught by Me te, to you, for your good, for terminating mundane existence; an vacyam, should not be taught; atapaskaya, to one who is devoid of austerities. It should kadacana, never, under any condition whatsoever; be taught abhaktaya, to one who is not a devotee, who is devoid of devotion to his teacher and God, even if he be a man of austerity. Neither should it be taught even asurusave, to one who does not redner service-even though he may be a devotee and a man of austerity. Na ca, nor as well; to him yah, who; abhyasuyati, cavils; mam, at Me, at Vasudeva-thinking that I am an ordinary person; to him who, not knowing My Godhood, imputes self-adulation etc. to Me and cannot tolerate Me. He too is unfit; to him also it should not be imparted.

From the force of the context it is understood that the Scripture should be taught to one who has devotion to the Lord, is austere, renders service, and does not cavil. As to that, since it is seen (in a Smrti)-'to one who is intelligent or to one who is austere'-that there is an option between the two, it follows that this should be imparted either to an austere person given to service and devotion, or to an intelligent person endowed with them. It should not be imparted to an austere or even an intelligent person if he lacks service and devotion. It should not be taught to one who cavils at the Lord, even though he be possessed of all the good qualities. And it should be taught to one whoserves his teacher and is devout. This is the rule for

transmitting the Scripture.

 

Hari OM

Shyam

--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Dennis Waite <dwaite wrote:

Dennis Waite <dwaite Proselytizing"Advaitin (AT) (DOT) Com" <advaitin >Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 1:31 PM

I wonder if any member can point me to some references in the Upanishads, Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively attempt to tell people about advaita unless they are ‘ready’ for that knowledge and specifically looking for it. I’m sure I have come across some words from Shankara to this effect but cannot immediately locate them.SES (School of Economic Science, where I first heard about this teaching long ago) always insisted that it was actually ‘dangerous’ to impart this knowledge to those who were not yet ready.

 

 

 

 

 

Best wishes,

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dennis - PraNAms

 

Krishna tells in 18th Ch. that this brahma vidya should not be taught to

everyone. He provides the qualifications of the student to whom this can be

taught.

 

Hari Om!

Sadananda

 

--- On Wed, 1/6/10, Dennis Waite <dwaite wrote:

 

 

Dennis Waite <dwaite

Proselytizing

" Advaitin (AT) (DOT) Com " <advaitin >

Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 1:31 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder if any member can point me to some references in the Upanishads,

Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively attempt to tell

people about advaita unless they are ‘ready’ for that knowledge and

specifically looking for it. I’m sure I have come across some words from

Shankara to this effect but cannot immediately locate them.SES (School of

Economic Science, where I first heard about this teaching long ago) always

insisted that it was actually ‘dangerous’ to impart this knowledge to those

who were not yet ready.

 

Best wishes,

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

 

Brahmasutra Bhashya, the very first sutra emphasizes the qualifications

while explaining the words atha ataH brahmajij~nAsA .

 

advaitinBrahmasuutra%20Notes/

 

[see the Folder : BSB Notes - K.Sadananda.PDF

Brahma Sutra Bhashya Notes - K. Sadananda ]

 

 

Vivekachudamani, verses 14-20 also elaborate on this.

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

 

advaitin , kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada

wrote:

>>

> --- On Wed, 1/6/10, Dennis Waite <dwaite wrote:

>

>

> Dennis Waite <dwaite

> Proselytizing

> " Advaitin (AT) (DOT) Com " <advaitin >

> Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 1:31 PM

>

>

> I wonder if any member can point me to some references in the Upanishads,

Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively attempt to tell

people about advaita unless they are ‘ready’ for that knowledge and

specifically looking for it. I’m sure I have come across some words from

Shankara to this effect but cannot immediately locate them.SES (School of

Economic Science, where I first heard about this teaching long ago) always

insisted that it was actually ‘dangerous’ to impart this knowledge to those

who were not yet ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sri Dennis-ji,

 

Namaste.

 

The " atha " word itself in the Brahmasutra 1.1.1 points out the same.

Sri Shankara in his bhasya says that " atha " means " afterwards " that

is, after the attainment of the four fold qualifications. The implied

meaning is " not before the attainment of the four fold

qualifications " .

 

All the scriptures (especially prakaraNa grantas), which talk about

these four-fold qualifications; Those who are endowed with these

four-fold qualifications are the competent persons in pursuit of the

said matter.

 

In Katha Upanishad: There is a beautiful introduction given by Sri

Shankara for the verse (1.1.20) " yeyam prete vicikitsa manushye... "

 

He says: " ...dvitiiya vara praptya api akritaartatvam tritiiya vara

gocharam aatmajnaanam antareNa iti aakhyaayikayaa prapanchayati.

yataH puurvasmaat karma gocharaat saadhya-saadhana-lakshanaat,

anityaat viraktasya aatmajnaane adhikaaraH... "

 

That is: " ... even after getting the first two boons (one for the

welfare of his father and the other the vidya through which one can

enjoy heaven for a time), without the Self-Knowledge, one does not get

satisfied. This is being stated by this story. He is the competent

person for Self-Knowledge, who relinquishes the ephemeral which are

attainable through action (or of the form of action and its result). "

 

There are many more such instances.

 

With regards,

Anupam.

> I wonder if any member can point me to some references in the Upanishads,

Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively attempt to tell

people about advaita unless they are ‘ready’ for that knowledge and specifically

looking for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > --- On Wed, 1/6/10, Dennis Waite <dwaite@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dennis Waite <dwaite@>

> > Proselytizing

> > " Advaitin (AT) (DOT) Com " <advaitin >

> > Wednesday, January 6, 2010, 1:31 PM

> >

> >

> > I wonder if any member can point me to some references in the Upanishads,

Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively attempt to tell

people about advaita unless they are ‘ready’ for that knowledge and

specifically looking for it. I’m sure I have come across some words from

Shankara to this effect but cannot immediately locate them.SES (School of

Economic Science, where I first heard about this teaching long ago) always

insisted that it was actually ‘dangerous’ to impart this knowledge to those

who were not yet ready.

>

 

 

Namaste.

 

Sage Vasishtha says:

 

ajnasya ardha-prabuddhasya sarvam brahmeti yo vadet .

 

mahaa-niraya-jaaleShu sa tena viniyojitaH .(Yoga VAsishTha)

 

// He who preaches to the ignorant and the half-learned that everything is

Brahman, verily entangles him in a mesh of horrible hells. //

 

There is another verse, slightly in a different context:

 

 

sAmsArika-sukhAsaktam aham bramheti vAdinam.

karma-brahmobhaya-bhraShTam taM tyajet antyajam yathaa.

 

A rough translation: Someone who is indulgent in worldly pleasures but proclaims

'I am Brahman' is actually fallen from both the path of karma (yoga) and jnana

(yoga). He is to be rejected as someone who is unworthy of being associated

with. (the source of this verse is not known)

 

In the Bhagavadgita bhashya Shankara has said that Arjuna is not fit to receive

the Vedantic teaching of jnana yoga since he is not yet an adhikAri.

 

Om Tat Sat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,-Krishna tells in 18th Ch. that this brahma vidya... Also remember the Bhagavan's words in BG verse 18/67 -"ida.n te.... yo.abhyasUyati" - is said without a trace of prejudice. HH Swami Chinmayanadaji continues -" it is equivalent to saying - PLEASE DO NOT SOW SEEDS ON ROCKS - for, the sower will never be able to reap, as nothing can grow on rocks.RegardsBalagopal

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

praNAms Shri Dennis-ji,

 

[i have seen that members more learned than me have replied, but here is

mine.]

 

advaitin , " Dennis Waite " <dwaite wrote:

>

> I wonder if any member can point me to some references in the Upanishads,

> Gaudapada or Shankara which advise that one should not actively attempt to

> tell people about advaita unless they are 'ready' for that knowledge and

> specifically looking for it. I'm sure I have come across some words from

> Shankara to this effect but cannot immediately locate them.SES (School of

> Economic Science, where I first heard about this teaching long ago) always

> insisted that it was actually 'dangerous' to impart this knowledge to

> those who were not yet ready.

 

 

According to my understanding, there is no other means for a guru to impart

vedantic knowledge to a shishya, other than my seeing his dispassion to the

world. Shankara, when introducing Chapter 15 of gItA (which He concludes,

saying that it is is the summum-bonum of all vedanta), says " viraktasya hi

saMsaaraat.h bhagavattatvaj~naane adhikaaraH\, na anyasyeti " meaning " The

competence for the knowledge of the nature of God is only his who has become

detached from the world; not of any other " .

 

Hope this helps!

praNAmaH to all advaitins

Ramakrishna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Dennis-ji,

Namaste.

 

Mundaka Upanishad talks about the qualifications of the Spiritual

Teacher as well as the Aspirant. Please see 1.2.12 and 1.2.13 of the

same Upanishad.

 

Thanks and regards,

Anupam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sincere thanks to all who responded to this request. The

group really is the most wonderful source of Vedantic wisdom and we are all

fortunate indeed to be able to participate.

 

Best wishes,

Dennis

 

 

 

advaitin

[advaitin ] On Behalf Of anupam srivatsav

07 January 2010 14:37

advaitin

Re: Proselytizing

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Dennis-ji,

Namaste.

 

Mundaka Upanishad talks about the qualifications of the Spiritual

Teacher as well as the Aspirant. Please see 1.2.12 and 1.2.13 of the

same Upanishad.

 

Thanks and regards,

Anupam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,

 

Mudgala Upanishad quote:

 

etatpurushhasuuktaarthamatirahasyaM

raajaguhyaM devaguhyaM guhyaadapi guhyataraM

naadiikshitaayopadishet.h .

naanuuchaanaaya .

naayaj~nashiilaaya .

naavaishhNavaaya .

naayogine .

na bahubhaashhiNe .

naapriyavaadine .

naasa.nvatsaravedine .

naatushhTaaya .

naanadhiitavedaayopadishet.h .

 

http://sanskritdocuments.org/doc_1_index.html

 

 

" Therefore one should not impart to an uninitiated person

this Purusha-sukta which is a secret, nor to one who

does not know the Vedas, a non-sacrificer, a non-Vaishnava,

non-Yogin, a talkative person, a harsh talker, one who takes

more than a year to learn, the discontented. " ...

 

http://www.celextel.org/108upanishads/mudgala.html

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Sunder

 

advaitin , anupam srivatsav <anupam.srivatsav wrote:

>

> Dear Dennis-ji,

> Namaste.

>

> Mundaka Upanishad talks about the qualifications of the Spiritual

> Teacher as well as the Aspirant. Please see 1.2.12 and 1.2.13 of the

> same Upanishad.

>

> Thanks and regards,

> Anupam.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste,A balanced mind with immense sense of strength and fairness sprung from wisdom is a requirement.( BG verse 2 / 15 - "ya.n hi na...... kalpate"). RegardsBalagopal

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Shri Dennis,

 

In reply to your posting #47269, another reference would be the Shvetashvatara

Upanishad, stanza 6.22:

 

vedAnte paramaM guhyam purAkalpe pracoditam

nAprashAntAya dAtavyam nAputrAyAshiShAya vA punaH .

 

[The highest secret in Vedanta, as declared in a past age, must not be given out

to one who does not come to peace, who's not a son or a disciple.]

 

Ananda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...