Anyone dumber than I?

[Guest guest]

Let us assume there are two types of languages. The first type of language is used “internally” for thoughts, words. Since everything is “internal” let us assume that a thought is nothing but a word.

This internal language is a verbal-language, or thought-language. A verbal-language can only tell us about thoughts, words. A verbal-language cannot tell us anything about no-thoughts, no-words, no-language. And if a verbal-language cannot tell us about a no-language it can certainly not tell us anything about a verbal-black-hole.

 

The Hindus discovered this limitation of verbal-languages five-thousand years ago. They could not use their verbal-language to tell us what their unified-field of “verbal-black-hole” was. The best they could do is use their verbal-language and point to this “verbal-black-hole” which they called Atman.

The second type of language the mind projects outside -- like the language of physics and its energy, and computers and their electricity.

These projected languages are different from internal verbal-languages in that they give us their “no-language.” They give us their black-holes.

When all energy is gone in physics we have a black-hole. A computer has digital code which is its language. When you turn the electricity off the digital code vanishes and you have a digital-black-hole. When the computer is turned on the digital-black-hole appears to vanish.

The Hindus did not have imaginary energy fields and electricity to understand that when these are turned off it leaves a “black-hole” – Atman, Samadhi.

Put the two types of languages together and you have “reality” that is simply a verbal-black-hole.

Verbal-language is nothing more than a verbal-field that keeps everything created out of words, thoughts “real.” When this verbal-field is turned off we have the no-language, the verbal-black-hole, dreamless-sleep that the Hindus called Atman, Samadhi, Kundalini, Nirvana.

 

Where have I gone wrong?

GP