Guest guest Posted November 23, 2004 Report Share Posted November 23, 2004 advaitin , " Ram Chandran " <RamChandran@a...> wrote: > > Namaste Sri Tony: > > If there is no time, no world, and the state of bodiless moksha, then > we shouldn't writing or discussing. Since we are not at that level, > we need to understood Shankara's teaching with respect to the level > where we see time, world, etc. Honestly we both are under illusions - > you with the illusion that you have already reached the state of > bodiless moksha and I with the illusion to look for the path to find > the state of bodiless moksha! > > The discussants do understand your contention which is valid for the > realized souls. What the discussants want to know is why we are in > the present status and whether the teachings of Sankara can help us > to go beyond time, world and body-mind-intellect based perceptions. > The question is rather complex and your simplified approach and > answer can never take us anywhere! We have to remove all notions > including Saguna and Nirguna before we can get to the state of > bodiless moksha! At the state of bodiless moksha, there will be > neither Saguna nor nirguna!! > > warmest regards, > > Ram Chandran Namaste R, I must admit that of late, I have given up on long writings and dialectics, somewhat. I suppose I'm in concordance with Nisargadatta Maharaj when he said all you have to do is give up the idea that you are a person. I haven't relatively arrived at a state of bodiless moksha, otherwise I wouldn't be writing on here at all. With regard to time, it only exist between points of reference. A recent experiment, by Nasa, showed that a plane in sub space or space-craft even slowed down time. Or rather persons on such a plane or craft were younger than their colleagues on the planet. This of course goes into the old story of a spaceship travelling at light speed to the planets and back. On return the earth has gone through ages and the returning adventurer knows not a soul or they he. This I feel even scientifically proves that there is no time as we know it at least and therefore is unreal. Where is the unfolding now? Without going into subatomic particles going back in time, science itself is approaching the stage of the mysics it seems--well lower stage anyway. Sankara's teaching is ultimately Ajata and so is Ramana's to his own admittance. I must admit that I have never had any formal training in any kind of philosophy, and I have distilled what I appear to know from reading various vedanta. This in fact may or may not be an advantage, for the Truth is very simple. So simple that people don't understand it, or if educated afraid of it sometimes. I still believe that rising above the mind or negating it is the way to realise that it didn't exist in the first place. I have been accused of Buddhism, well as opposed to Buddism the religion, Gautama the Buddha said there was an 'Unbecoming' so he wasn't a nihilist. My point is that there never was a creation or becoming. I do question whether many agree with this position, as it interferes with their practical rituals and belief systems. Howver sadhana is necessary to purify the vijnanamayakosa which results in realisation...........ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.