Guest guest Posted December 14, 2004 Report Share Posted December 14, 2004 NonDualPhil , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: NonDualPhil , ombhurbhuva <ombhurbhuva@e...> wrote: > Hi Tony, > Perhaps you should give up philosophy if it doesn't > suit you or read a little more of it so you can counter the > rebuttals of others without losing the run of yourself. You > had worn a path from Nirguna to Saguna and were quite > content until you discovered ajativada. Then the fat was on > the fire said the Sean Bhan Bocht(poor old woman). I > already told you about the argumentum ad hominem. I' > working my keyboard to the bone, and what thanks do I get > for it, no thanks, nothing but abuse. > > Mikey. > > Tony wrote: Namaste, Philososphy is fine as long as it leads somewhere. Actually I did believe in ajatavada for a long time. EVer since I first read Sri Ramana Maharshi, in the 1980s. I just didn't talk about it for what is to talk about? There is no point in mixing apples and oranges whilst posting. Sri Ramana used to say that one need not analyze the contents of garbage in detail before throwing it away! This seems to be the problem with philosophising, it goes around in circles. In the end result the Sages say on bodiless Moksha the world disappears, so it can never have happened..........ONS..Tony. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.