Guest guest Posted April 7, 2005 Report Share Posted April 7, 2005 NonDualPhil , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: > > NonDualPhil , " Wim Borsboom " > <wim_borsboom> wrote: > > > > Wim wrote: > > > > I would like to know how our list members would answer the > > > > following questions: > > > > > > > > - Did the human mind develop before language or did it develop > > > > simultaneously and reciprocally? (logos, logic???) > > > > - Do we think in 'thought forms' (a trendy word) or do we think > > > > verbally based on mental images (the mind's eye's conceptual > > > > in-form-ation of sensual input?) that have been identified > > > > and " named " . > > > > - What is the relationship between thinking and mind? > > > > - Did thinking develop prior to language or did language and > > > > thinking develop in tandem... again simultaneously and > > > > reciprocally?? > > > > - When we " think " , what 'percentage' of it is 'silently' > verbal? > > Namaste Wim. > > The non existent delusion of Saguna Brahman concept, projects > the 'Great Mahat' or Universal Mind. As we in delusion are just > waves on this ocean, language, which is just spoken thought must > logically have developed later. Can a dumb person think? Of course. > Can a blind person speak and think, of course? > Language is common to all animals and even lessor developed beings, > it is just a form of communication that's all. No doubt amongst > people expert in telepathy and imaging, such as Australian > Aborigines and othe such folk, the spoken language isn't as > important as it is in minds careering beyond control to > infinity....................hahahaahah........ONS...Tony. As another thought, or image, there is the theory of morphic fields and morphic resonance put out by that Oxford Universtiy chap, I forget his name right now. However it is just another way of describing the kosas and so called components of the mind. The mind or thought doesn't emantate from the brain anymore that a programme emanates from a computer hard-drive.........ONS...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2005 Report Share Posted April 7, 2005 advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: > > NonDualPhil , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > wrote: > > > > NonDualPhil , " Wim Borsboom " > > <wim_borsboom> wrote: > > > > > > Wim wrote: > > > > > I would like to know how our list members would answer the > > > > > following questions: > > > > > > > > > > - Did the human mind develop before language or did it > develop > > > > > simultaneously and reciprocally? (logos, logic???) > > > > > - Do we think in 'thought forms' (a trendy word) or do we > think > > > > > verbally based on mental images (the mind's eye's conceptual > > > > > in-form-ation of sensual input?) that have been identified > > > > > and " named " . > > > > > - What is the relationship between thinking and mind? > > > > > - Did thinking develop prior to language or did language and > > > > > thinking develop in tandem... again simultaneously and > > > > > reciprocally?? > > > > > - When we " think " , what 'percentage' of it is 'silently' > > verbal? > > > > Namaste Wim. > > > > The non existent delusion of Saguna Brahman concept, projects > > the 'Great Mahat' or Universal Mind. As we in delusion are just > > waves on this ocean, language, which is just spoken thought must > > logically have developed later. Can a dumb person think? Of > course. > > Can a blind person speak and think, of course? > > Language is common to all animals and even lessor developed > beings, > > it is just a form of communication that's all. No doubt amongst > > people expert in telepathy and imaging, such as Australian > > Aborigines and othe such folk, the spoken language isn't as > > important as it is in minds careering beyond control to > > infinity....................hahahaahah........ONS...Tony. > > As another thought, or image, there is the theory of morphic fields > and morphic resonance put out by that Oxford Universtiy chap, I > forget his name right now. However it is just another way of > describing the kosas and so called components of the mind. The mind > or thought doesn't emantate from the brain anymore that a programme > emanates from a computer hard-drive.........ONS...Tony. Rupert Sheldrake. http://www.sheldrake.org/papers/Morphic/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.