Guest guest Posted April 29, 2005 Report Share Posted April 29, 2005 NonDualPhil , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: NonDualPhil , " Wim Borsboom " <wim_borsboom> wrote: > Tony wrote: > > Everyone is at least a closet dualist until moksha. > > and which answer will deepen out and become richer over time as you > re-discover more and more about being. > When you admitted to being a dualist you only admitted to a BELIEF > that is based on a wrong philosophy, that you somehow were led to > believe will help you get to Moksha at some later stage. > Namaste Wim, I never admitted to being a dualist. I don't believe it happened at all, so how can I be true dualist? Semantically following Sankara's saying that it is real whilst one is in it, is where I am at. I deal with it on that basis only. I am a dualist to that extent without belief until Moksha. I do not follow your philosophy of it being appearance, and there is a continuum to the Sakti. As I posted from the Gita yesterday it is only karmic illusion that runs this world, there is no interference from Sakti, Kundalini etc, it all 100% action reaction. However IMO the ultimate truth is Nirguna Brahman. A creation that Brahman is unaware of is impossible so it cannot have happened. We are all closet dualists as long as our fist hurts if we punch a wall, however that doesn't mean we have to believe it is real. There is no creation, no kundalini, no sakti and no Saguna Brahman....ONS..Tony. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.