Guest guest Posted May 10, 2005 Report Share Posted May 10, 2005 Namaste, from advaitin list, > Proceeding from this base, the proponent concludes that > Ishvara also is mAyA and so all worship, pUjA, divine will, > the concept of surrender, -- all these are non-existent. A > consequence of this is to deny > 1. Existence of Ishvara > 2. Concept of Divine will > 3. Concept of Surrender. > > According to me, the consequence of even one of these leads > to atheism. Advaita should not lead to an atheistic > attitude. So my answer to the above would go something like > this: > The statement " Ishvara exists only in the mAyic world " is a > statement true from the absolute point of view. It is a > statement which only the Absolute Supreme Brahman can say, > if at all it 'says'. Ourselves being in the mAyic world, > we cannot say that Ishvara is mAyA for us. In our > vyVavahAric state, just as we take care of our body > granting its existence, we have to grant that Ishvara > exists. This is why, I think, our teachers all insist that > advaita-learning should only follow an 'Astikya-buddhi' > (the conviction that Ishvara exists) and should not replace > 'Astikya-buddhi'. > > I would like members of the list to help me polish the > above paragraph of mine or correct me if I have defaulted > in the understanding of advaita. > > PraNAms to all advaitins. > profvk > > Prof. V. Krishnamurthy Namaste,VK,IMHO, Isvara is the sum total of all the Jivas, it is a concept as real as oneself. If you believe in Devas then for you there are Devas. There really is no 'Divine Will' interfering, everything is Karma and Prana only and that is illusion also. Surrender means just accepting one's karma as one cannot change it anyway. The only thing we seem to be able to change is our 'attitude' to events. I firmly believe that it never happened and there is only Nirguna, is being a contradictory verb in this case. Because Nirguna is beyond all concepts, beyond Sat-Cit-Ananda and all attributes, doesn't make one an atheist, if that is what one accepts. One just has to accept the non being, unborn, incomprehensible. It is all still karma but essentially the only beings that can help one are Saints, Sages and Avatars. God does no action, makes no judgements and really doesn't hear any prayers. I can understand though that if some people have this need for a 'God' doing something it can cause some to become atheists or be demoralised, if they knew the truth but couldn't accept it. If they didn't have that level of purification or understanding in their vijnanamayakosa. That is why Sankar said 'Bhaja Govindam' I personally accept my truth that it didn't happen at all, if it did it would be seen in deep sleep, samadhi and moksha-it isn't..No snake and no rope!...ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.