Guest guest Posted June 1, 2005 Report Share Posted June 1, 2005 Namaste, There are various interpretations depending on the level of understanding of the recipient. The word Christ means Messiah or Annointed One, in Greek. It may be related more than cognitively to the Sanskrit Krista, which is another name for Krishna. In Christianity there is the concept of a 'God Immanent', and a 'God Transcendant'. The exclusive teaching of the Vedanta is actually Nirguna Brahman. Saguna Brahman, can be equated with the idea of 'God' in Christianity. The Christian God is similar in concept to Isvara. It really is Sat-Tat-Om. Sat being the Father, Tat being the Sakti, or Son, Om being the Holy Spirit. So when Jesus says nobody comes to the Father he is talking as the Son or Sakti. Nisargadatta says we are actually Praneaswara really. And as we are actually the Praneaswara, the way of Realisation is through that. We realise our unity with the 'creation', whilst we are still in the body, the oneness with Brahman. So it seems we realise Praneaswara and at the same time Nirguna Brahman. The Illusion totally disappearing on bodiless Moksha. Remembering that the final pull into Moksha is by Brahman's Grace, there can be no way to the Father than through the Son/Sakti/Praneaswara. I have made some purports on the Gospel of Thomas, which is not part of the regualar canon, as it was not discovered until fairly recently in Nag Hammadi. It does give an idea of how the Gnostics thought and even how many Christian Mystics thought. http://www.geocities.com/aoclery/Jesusbook/Thomasgospel.htm Depending on the level of thought, there are many parallels between all religions. In fact Christianity of the Catholic sort could fit into Sanathan Dharma quite easily, if the exclusiveness of Jesus as the only Avatar or Mukti were dropped. This was a later Roman interpolation into Christianity anyway. As it is accepted by many that Jesus or Jeshua spent years in India, and the the Sankaracharya at the temple in Puri or Jagganath is supposed to have said that he read of Jeshua's visit in the temple record. It is not surprising that there should be parallels in the teachings particularly, GJohn and GThomas and the Sermon on the Mount..............ONS....Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.