Brahmacharya

[Guest guest]

--- Vinayak Lohani <vinayaklohani wrote:

 

> Dear Sir,

>

> Read your message on Brahmacharya that you have

> posted. You mentioned

> that once a person realises Brahma, one can indulge

> in sexual act for

> then the Karma will not be a binding one. Sir, it

> does not need too

> much thought to appreciate that sexual act is borne

> out of tremendous

> desire. It is an act born out of a sense of opposite

> (a sense of

> perceiving the other sex). In my opinion after

> realisation, one

> cannot undergo sexual act at all, for there will not

> remain any

> such 'sense of opposite' at all. One sees the same

> One everywhere.

> If something is born out of desire then it is surely

> binding. I fail

> to see how such a powerfully emotional act as sex

> will be free from

> desire.

>

> However, this is not to say that hosueholders do not

> reach the

> Ultimate Goal. They do but in that last phase of

> Sadhana even they

> take up Brahmacharya, or rather the Brahmacharic

> nature comes on its

> own. There have been many Hosuehodler Saints but

> even they attained

> the Supreme after taking up a Brahmacharic life.

>

> This is my humble opinion.

>

> Pranams,

> Vinayak

 

Namaste,V-ji, IMHO,

 

Brahmacharya is a choice, but there must be no desire,

or what is the point?

 

The fact remains that if one becomes 'Realised', even

in a state of Moksha the body still has prarabda karma

to fulfill. If that karma was to have sex day or night

until death, then that is what would happen. However

it is just the body, there is nobody, no ego, to

receive the fruits of the action.

 

Just as many Avatars had sex and families. Many of

them descended as Avatars and then realised Moksha,

but even they had to pay the taxes so to speak. An

Avatar isn't the same as a Mukta, unless they achieve

Moksha during the Avatara................ONS....

 

 

 

 

 

Discover

Use to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out!

http://discover./