Guest guest Posted July 4, 2005 Report Share Posted July 4, 2005 advaitin , Shailendra Bhatnagar <bhatnagar_shailendra> wrote: Do the > Upanishads/Brahmsutra state anywhere that satyam, > jnanam and anantam are not attributes and that Brahman > is attributeless. Namaste,B-ji,IMHO, Nir Guna means what it says 'no gunas' or modifications, indescribable to the mind. There are other ways of saying the same thing. Jnanam, anantam and satyam are describing states or conditions or qualities in the positive, therefore could be said to be attributes. Any description or modification is an attribute. That is how I understand it. In a way even Nirguna is giving a name but it is in the negative. For any level of mind cannot ever understand Nirguna Brahman...........ONS..Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.