Fwd: Flemming, why I blather one about Amma

[Guest guest]

GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery>

wrote:

GuruRatings , " Don James " <donjames150>

wrote:

> GuruRatings , " yogidahl2000 "

> <Dahl_flemming@h...> wrote:

>

> >

> > Just notice,that he writes about and mentions Ammachi each

> > and every day,and more than ONCE,in fact he can hardly write

> > one single post without Amma being in it

> > I personally like that,because,by coincidence Ammachi is one

> > of the 11-12 now-living gurus I have full confidence in

> > But not ALL people here might appreciate this " obsession " of

Don's

> >

>

> It seems only Chris Keniley on this forum shares my passion for

Amma.

> Is it obsession? I'd call it conviction or maybe even absorption.

> I've kind of been absorbed into Amma's connection and immersion,

even

> into her samadhi to some degree. I could not resist it, wouldn't

if I

> could have, you know? Simply put, she is Enlightenment and E is

life,

> pure and simple. Enlightenment is life. So yes, I'm pro-life :-)

And

> I sing her praises so that perhaps others will go see her who

never

> have. I'm already directly responsible for at least a dozen going

to

> see her, some who I've held their hands as they met her.

 

Namaste,

 

I don't know what stage Amma is at, but she does good work and helps

people. That's probably enough. With regard to being absorbed in her

and her samadhis etc. This is just putting the name Amma on one's

own higher self. It is easier for some to do something external at

different stages in their sadhana. Amma's own words indicate that

different devotees view her in different ways and she tolerates it

because she can't stop it anyay. If it is harmless and useful why

bother?...She is a tool in ekagratha or one-

pointedness..........ONS...--- End forwarded message ---