Guest guest Posted September 12, 2005 Report Share Posted September 12, 2005 advaitin , " frank maiello " <egodust> wrote: advaitin , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: > Namaste, Who am I and I am. > > I see no difference really between these two sayings, as there is no > real object in either. I am is I am, and Who am I? is a question. Both > are to drive the mind inward to the feeling of 'Being' or the big 'I'. > This is the important thing to remember the 'feeling' for it has no > name really, not an I or I-I or any language.For the enquiry end up > without an I and so does the I am, just an am............ONS..Tony. hariH OM! tony-ji, well said! this flags the core essence behind the play of the jiva *as well as* the jivatman(!), being the intended meaning behind what sages refer to as the Self or, as you mentioned, the Big 'I.' namaste, frank --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.