Guest guest Posted September 13, 2005 Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 In advaitin , S Jayanarayanan <sjayana> wrote: > --- Hariram_Subramonia <Hariram_Subramonia@i...> wrote: > > [..] > > > >>I respect Swami Chinmayananda for his great contributions to > > >>Vedanta, but most philosophers would find problems with his > > >>arguments for the existence of God as they appear in a > > dialog Namaste,IMHO, oranges, apples and eggs, It all depends on the direction that you are coming from. If you talk of a God doing something then it is almost obligatory to have some personalisation of the Vishnu concept. This is very Dvaita. If you are looking at God being somewhat impersonal but at the same time extant,,,this is getting into Visishtadvaita. If you regard all as one, then the concept of a God comes under strain. For it can only be given a reality for arguments sake in delusion. And then as only the ground or energy, for karma does the work...Here we are nearer to Advaita, which ultimately can only be Ajativada..............ONS...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.