Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: > GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: > Namaste, > > According to Maharaj's percentages only about 60,000 people on the > planet can understand non duality intellectually never mind anything > else or be a Mukta. > > So out of this 60,000 so called enlightened, how many would be > realised?.............Very few is my guess...Tony. > --- End forwarded message ---============================= Dearest Tony -- I did not know that there was another that could be unrealized. And now you tell me that there are thousands… millions. How does your non-duality come to these numbers when – according to my non-duality – there is no other? TO my way of thinking there is not even a me nor you, nor these stupid words… only the Laughter that experts of non-duality need for their words to add up to the millions. LOVE gp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 advaitajnana , " Gene Polotas " <gpalotas> wrote: > advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > wrote: > > GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > wrote: > > Namaste, > > > > According to Maharaj's percentages only about 60,000 people on the > > planet can understand non duality intellectually never mind > anything > > else or be a Mukta. > > > > So out of this 60,000 so called enlightened, how many would be > > realised?.............Very few is my guess...Tony. > > --- End forwarded message ---============================= > > > Dearest Tony -- I did not know that there was another that could be > unrealized. > And now you tell me that there are thousands… millions. > How does your non-duality come to these numbers when – according > to my non-duality – there is no other? > TO my way of thinking there is not even a me nor you, nor these > stupid words… only the Laughter that experts of non-duality need > for their words to add up to the millions. > > LOVE > gp Namste gp, Depends on whether we are talking of apples or oranges...ONS..Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: > advaitajnana , " Gene Polotas " <gpalotas> > wrote: > > advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > > wrote: > > > GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > > wrote: > > > Namaste, > > > > > > According to Maharaj's percentages only about 60,000 people on > the > > > planet can understand non duality intellectually never mind > > anything > > > else or be a Mukta. > > > > > > So out of this 60,000 so called enlightened, how many would be > > > realised?.............Very few is my guess...Tony. > > > --- End forwarded message ---============================= > > > > > > Dearest Tony -- I did not know that there was another that could > be > > unrealized. > > And now you tell me that there are thousands… millions. > > How does your non-duality come to these numbers when – according > > to my non-duality – there is no other? > > TO my way of thinking there is not even a me nor you, nor these > > stupid words… only the Laughter that experts of non-duality need > > for their words to add up to the millions. > > > > LOVE > > gp > > Namste gp, > > Depends on whether we are talking of apples or oranges...ONS..>=============================== namaste Tony – if we are talking about the same thing -- which I assume is non-duality --then what is the difference between Maharaj's many-words and big-numbers and imaginary apples and imaginary oranges besides the imagination, the mind? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 22, 2005 Report Share Posted September 22, 2005 advaitajnana , " Gene Polotas " <gpalotas> wrote: > advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > wrote: > > advaitajnana , " Gene Polotas " <gpalotas> > > wrote: > > > advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> > > > wrote: > > > > GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " > <aoclery> > > > wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > According to Maharaj's percentages only about 60,000 people on > > the > > > > planet can understand non duality intellectually never mind > > > anything > > > > else or be a Mukta. > > > > > > > > So out of this 60,000 so called enlightened, how many would be > > > > realised?.............Very few is my guess...Tony. > > > > --- End forwarded message ---============================= > > > > > > > > > Dearest Tony -- I did not know that there was another that could > > be > > > unrealized. > > > And now you tell me that there are thousands… millions. > > > How does your non-duality come to these numbers when – according > > > to my non-duality – there is no other? > > > TO my way of thinking there is not even a me nor you, nor these > > > stupid words… only the Laughter that experts of non-duality need > > > for their words to add up to the millions. > > > > > > LOVE > > > gp > > > > Namste gp, > > > > Depends on whether we are talking of apples or oranges...ONS..> >=============================== > > namaste Tony – if we are talking about the same thing -- which I > assume is non-duality --then what is the difference between Maharaj's > many-words and big-numbers and imaginary apples and imaginary oranges > besides the imagination, the mind? Namaste, Nothing but on discussion groups we can talk relatively or try absolutes thats all.........Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.