Fwd: It is not necessary to prove molestation of fraud to disprove sb

[Guest guest]

sathyasaibaba2 , " Tony OClery " <aoclery>

wrote:

Namaste,

 

It is not necessary to prove a legal case against sb to disprove his

claim to be an avatar; It is almost impossible due to juristions and

corruption anyway.

 

Out of his own mouth he says he only has one desire and that is for

us all to become realised.

 

So if it can be shown that he has desires or even preferences other

than that it makes him a liar and a fraud.

 

He was addicted to betel for 45 years is one proof.

 

He has a preference for certain types of foods is another.

 

Either are enough to prove that he cannot be an avatar, for avatars

are desireless.

 

As I have said--I work alone and only when presented with an

opportunity to respond or illuminate. I have participated in several

exposures in the media and written several published articles on the

subject, as well as being instrumental in 2000 in getting 'the

findings' on to the internet magazines for the first time.

 

Exposure is the operative word and show he has desire, therefore in

the Hindu tradition he is a fraud...............ONS..Tony.

--- End forwarded message ---