Guest guest Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 GuruRatings , Insight <insight@s...> wrote: Anatta is talked about only by Buddhists. Knowledge and understanding can arise only in those people who have been taught that all things are anatta and should not be grasped or clung to. Here we reach the word 'emptiness' of which it is said that having seen it one will find contentment in Nirvana. We must thoroughly understand that on the first level emptiness is the absence of the feeling of 'I' and 'mine'. If those feelings are still present then the mind is not empty, it is disturbed by grasping and clinging. 'Empty' meaning free of the feeling of self or that things that belong to self; and disturbed meaning confused, depressed, in turmoil with the feeling of 'I' and 'mine'. What are the characteristics of the state empty of ego-consciousness? In the scriptures there is a teaching of the Buddha which list four points: Na aham kavicini - feeling that there is nothing that is me. Na kassaci kincanam kisminci - without worry or doubt that anything might be me. This makes one pair, the second pair is: Na mama kavacini - feeling that there is nothing that is 'mine'. Kisminci kincanam natthi - without worry or doubt that anything might be mine. (Anenjasappaya Sutta, Majjhima Nikaya) At the moment that anyone's mind is freed from these four things the Buddha held that to be emptiness. The commentary sums it up concisely as 'na attanena' - not taking things to be self and 'na attaniyena' - not taking things to belong to self, and that is sufficient. Try and imagine what it would be like when this grasping consciousness is not present. One doesn't look on anything anywhere as ever having been, as currently being, or as having the potential to be self or belong to self. There is no self in the present and no basis for anxiety regarding self in the past or future. All things are dhammas, simply parts of nature. This is the mind that is identical with emptiness. If we say the mind has attained or realized emptiness it leads some people to understand the mind is one thing and emptiness another. To say that the mind has realized emptiness is still not particularily correct. Please understand that if the mind was not one and the same thing as emptiness, there would be no way for emptiness to be known. The mind in its natural state is emptiness, it is an alien foolishness that enters and obstructs the vision of emptiness. Consequently, as soon as foolishness departs, the mind and emptiness are one. The mind then knows itself. It doesn't need to go anywhere else knowing objects, it holds to the knowing of emptiness, knowing nothing other than the freedom from 'self' amd 'belonging to self'. It is this emptiness that is the single highest teaching of the Buddha, so much so that in the Samyutta Nikaya the Buddha says that there are no words spoken by the Tathagata that are not concerned with sunnata. He says in that sutta that the most profound teaching is that which deals with emptiness, any other subject is superficial. Only the teaching of sunnata is so profound that there must be a Tathagata enlightened in the world for it to be taught. Heartwood from the Bo Tree Ven.Buddhadasa bhikkhu --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.