Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Namaste all, I find this somewhat more illumating than my weak attempts.........ONS.. advaitin , Ganesan Sankarraman <shnkaran wrote: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada wrote: Dhyaanasaraswatiji, Beautiful statement. Both bondage and liberation are mithya. But they appear to be satya as long as long as one has the notion that one is bound. Sir, May I be permitted to quote the following dialog between Rama and sage Vasishta, as brought about in the translation of sri R.M.Hari. " Question 294: Sir, you have instructed me to be established in the turiya state of quiescence. Are you free from the ideation of, ' I am Vasishta'? What is the nature of the turiya state where you do not experience the, 'I'. [ Hearing these words of Sri Ramachandra, Vasishtaji became quiet and gave no reply. At this Sri Ramachandra said, ' Sir, your silence does not suit you. You are truly Brahmagyani and jagat- guru. Nothing is unknown to you. Are you quiet because you consider me incompetent?' After a silence for a while, Vasishta replied.] Answer: Ramji, I did not become silent because of your incompetence, but I replied according to the nature of your question, or silence is the only answer to your question. Had you been an agyani, I would have replied in words, but because you are a gyani, I have answered it in gyan. Or, quiescence is the answer to your question; hence I remained silent. As long as you were an agyani, I answered your questions by the method of variants ( vikalpas), that is with ideation and words. All verbal statements or instructions are imbued with words and duality. Formerly, words and variants ( vikalpa ) suited you. But, now I have instructed you about Nirvikalpa ( the mode that is divested of illusions or variants). Ramji, words are of four kinds, viz (i) words having subtle purport, ( ii ) words having spiritual purport, ( iii ), and ( iv ) long or elaborate words. All these four types are limited on account of three kinds of deficiencies or faults ( kalank ): (i ) doubt or logic ( sanshay ), ( ii ) duality ( pratiyogi ) and three division or distinction ( bhed ). The state that is beyond mind and verbal description cannot be expressed with the afflicted words. " Vasishta very beautifully disowns the relevance of words in the scheme of the unravelling of that which is, which cannot be conceptualized through the network of thought, which is essentially a knower-known phenomenon, and is relevant only in the realm of the empirical. Vasishta ends this peroration by the final statement to the following effect: " When a person says, ' I am Brahman and that is the world,' you should assume that he has not yet attained gyan. When the jiva truly attains gyan, then he does not even have the awareness of non-duality.. He just becomes sublime. At that stage who will teach whom, and what? Words and meaning are absent at that stage and the universe is dissolved. " Further, Vasishta is very insightful in the following utterance, which is a practical guide for those who may not be familiar with the dialectics or averse to it. " Accepting the present that has arrived in regular course for the moment with the externalized intellect, and not accepting ( or entertaining ) the future and the past, the mind is reduced to the state free from thoughts. " ( Page 145, verses 40-41, the story of Ghadhi, Essence of Yoga Vasishta by Samvid) yours truly, Sankarraman Brings words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with Mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.