Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: Dog/cat cruelty - FREE ALL Asian Dogs

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery

wrote:

 

GuruRatings , " Gene Poole " <gene_poole@> >

>

> > Your realignment is Ahimsa in its purest final form. Ahimsa

doesn't

> > mean complete non violence by the way. This is the problem with

> > Sankrit translantions on philosophy. It more means resistance to

> > violence. In other words it may be necessary to use violence to

> > defend somebody being attacked for instance. That is still

> > Ahimsa....ONS...Tony.

>

>

> Indeed. Human individuals are by nature, dangerous

> animals; and our social pacts, designed to subdue

> this danger, inadvertantly engender higher levels of

> violence, such as 'ethnic cleansing' and 'religious

> wars'.

>

> It is our failure to notice our own animal nature,

> or our egoistic denial of it, which underlies all

> of our social 'problems'. Humans will never admit

> to their own animal nature, for as long as they

> assume 'ownership' of animals is proper and good.

> And humans will not cease being cruel to animals,

> until they realize the cruelties they inflict upon

> themselves, in the name of social-cohesion-as-imperative.

>

>

> ==GP==

>

Namaste,

 

Actually in the pet owning community I'm sure more people regard

their pets as members of the family rather than owned animals.

However for want of responsibility and legal definition the

term 'owner' is used. Same soul just different body that's all.

 

Most pet owners who have a spiritual bent do not see any significant

difference between humans and pets, in fact probably prefer the pet.

Perhaps in the dim and distant past, probably millions rather than

thousands of years wild animals were domesticated. There are lot of

half wolves and pet wolves here in Canada for example.

 

Somebody broke into the shelter recently, and 19 dogs escaped, or

were released. When staff turned up 18 were waiting at the back door.

 

I find it interesting that in many Edgar Cayce readings, pets

reincarnate to visit with the same family, sometimes changing

species. I don't believe everything about Cayce but his 95%+

accuracy on medical reading is impressive enough even for a rampant

rationalist.

 

I feel that the role of karma takes the animal and puts in the

company of humans to learn and pick up human samskaras. In this way

the animal can visualise being a human on the astral and then

eventually take birth as a human, on the road to Moksha.

 

So it is all part of a karmic plan effected some way by higher

beings or Devas.

 

The animal comes to work out its own karma in the world not provide

food for humans...........ONS.....Tony.

 

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...