Guest guest Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 advaitin , " Tony OClery " <aoclery wrote: advaitin , " mahadevadvaita " <mahadevadvaita@> wrote: > > Om Tat Sat > Namaste, I came across this upanishad on another mailing list > and for once I did not believe this is the content of an upanishad, > especially since I had never heard of this upanishad. Some of the > portions of the upanishad seem as if they are written by Acharya > Shankar. Here is a sample (Veda Vyasa's upadesh to Suka) > > " This world is Maya. It seems to appear just like a dream. It is > superimposed on the Lord just like a rope on a serpent. This is the > eternal Truth. There is no creation in reality. All is absolute. All > is Truth. Knowing this, one is liberated at once. " > > ............ > " The Paramatman is only the Sakshi. He does not do anything. He only > assumes the form of the Jiva through His Maya, just as the Akasa > inside a pot seems to be different from the Akasa outside and > assumes the form of the pot. In reality all is Siva, Advaita, the > One Absolute. There is no difference of whatever kind. " > > The full text is at : > http://www.shastras.com/108upanishads/rudrahridaya/ > > regards, > Om Tat Sat > Namaste, I see nothing wrong in that Upanishad, it is showing the truth of Ajativada. Which was propounded by Gaudapada and others. Even when Sankara is teaching you will notice that he often uses the expression..'Means'. So indicating that some idea or practise isn't the ultimate truth but a means to an end a Sadhana.....ONS..Tony. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.