Tesla and E=MC2

[Guest guest]

advaitin , " hersh_b " <hershbhasin wrote:

>

> Namaste Ram mohan Ji

> >when we talk about the superimposition,is there an object " sky "

> there at all?

> >is it not mere space and that space there looks " blue " ?

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

> The argument was that an all pervasive substance (ether) exists

and

> we superimpose the mental construct of " dark-blue " color onto it

(

> quote.. " for non-discerning men superimpose on the ether, which is

not

> the object of sensuous perception, dark-blue color " .). In other

words

> ether exists and the dark blue color of sky does not really exist.

It

> is a illusion. We see something that is not really there.

According

> to you even the sky does not exist but somehow we see only blue

space.

>

> Physicists have tried to prove the existence of ether but failed.

> Experiments by Michelson-Morley to detect the " ether-wind " failed

> (http://www.juliantrubin.com/bigten/michelsonmorley.html). The

only

> possible conclusion from this series of very difficult experiments

> was that the whole concept of an all-pervading ether was wrong

from

> the start.

>

> However Maxwell and later Einstein have introduced the concept of

> electromagnetic fields. If we replace ether with the all pervasive

> electro magnetic field, we find a happy match of western science

with

> our Sankhya philosophy of Prana and Akasha. As Vivakananda has

> explained in his complete works (Raj -yoga, Sankhya and Prana

> lectures), matter is energy in motion and we are all " whirlpools "

of

> energy in motion. He has said that if we take a piece of thread

and

> whirl it at very high speed, it can cut through matter. Hence it

can

> be shown that matter in energy in motion. In other words matter

and

> energy are interchangeable. His letter with Tesla showed that he

had

> expected Tesla to work out a mathematical formula relating matter

&

> energy, which he could not and was later formulated by Einstein.

 

Namaste,

 

Einstein wasn't the first to introduce the theory of relativity,

which actually as you are aware is flawed; For the speed of light

isn't constant and can be speeded up or slowed down. Boskovic did

much work on this as well, a couple of hundred years ago.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boskovic

 

I think in Hindu Myth the person who penetrated matter completely

was probably Hiranyakasipu and that may have been a couple of

million years ago.

 

Tesla also stated that:

 

I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it

can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has

properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own

making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter

filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space

becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon

nothing. I, for one, refuse to to such a view., [22]

Wikipedia on Tesla.

 

So his differences with Einstein were obviously philosophical as

well.

 

Of course it depends on what one means by 'Space'. For space isn't

empty it is prana and akasha. Which is energy and

therefore 'creation'. Tesla seems to be inferring that space is

Prakriti and he may be right at that level.

 

In essence taking his very Vedantic statement above, he seems to be

at the understanding of Saguna at least.ONS...Tony.