Guest guest Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 advaitin , Lakshmi Muthuswamy <lakmuthu wrote: > > Namaste Tony, > > " Actually this is true to a certain extent. For if one is a true Jnani > one would realise there is no Isvara, Saguna Brahman, therefore by > common definition one is an atheist for rising above it all. " > Nirguna cannot be described by definition. So I look forward to the > day that I am an A-Theist or a Jivanmukta.............ONS..Tony. " > > When one raises above all, as a jIvan muktA he will percive brahman everywhere. He sees Ishvara in all. He sees divinity everywhere. He is all Ananda. All differences are absolved. > > sarvam khalu idam brahman.- How can he be an atheist? > > om namo narayanaya > Lakshmi Muthuswamy Namaste LM-ji, Because you are assuming that the Jivanmukta sees or experiences. If this were so then it would not constitute moksha. What sees and hears is the body/mind complex surviving the ego being destroyed. So the mind is in fact the Sakti then and sees itself. However this is at the illusory Saguna level, and the Mukta is Nirguna with no experience at all. In fact with the dropping of the body there is no connection at all, even though Sakti because it never did happen at all, not even the illusion or appearance. No snake no rope.........Ajativada...........ONS...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.