Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 advaitin , " subrahmanian_v " <subrahmanian_v wrote: Srigurubhyo NamaH The Three States and their objects: In the Mandukya Upanishad, we have the analysis of the three states of waking, dream and deep sleep. While discussing these three states, the Upanishad, especially the Kaarikaas, embark upon this scheme: In each of the three states there is a bhokta, subject, experiencer, a bhoga, experience, and and bhogyam, object of experience. Also, there is a bhoga, experience, in each state that the interaction brings about. This is succinctly known as 1.sthAna-trayam 2.bhoktru- trayam 3.bhogya-trayam and 4. tripti-trayam. (let us not bother about the `sthana' in this discussion.) In the Upanishad the mantras: 3,4,5 and 6 deal with the above and the Kaarikaas: 1 to 5 expatiate on these. The Acharya's bhashya is also there. While the waking bhokta is called vishva, his bhogyam is the entire gross universe, experienced through the sense organs and mind. The Tripti that he gets is the sukha- duhkha from this experience. The dream experiencer is known as taijasa. His bhogyam is the entire subtle universe. He experiences this subtle (mind-created) universe with the sense organs, also created there for that purpose. The tripti he gets, again, is the sukha and duhkha experienced there. The sleep-experiencer is known as prAjna. His bhogyam is Ananda. While all the sense organs and even the creating mind are resolved then, he experiences this ananda. The Bhashyam clarifies that this ananda is not the Ultimate Bliss, as this sleep state is only in the relative, ignorant, plane. The Bhashya for the kArikA no.2 clarifies at the fag-end: // The causal state, too, is very much experienced in the body, inasmuch as an awakened man is seen to have such a recollection: `I did not know anything (in my deep sleep).' Hence it is said, `tridhA dehe vyavasthitaH' = existing in three ways in the body.'// What is pertinent here is, just like in each of the waking and dream states there is the duality of: experiencer and experienced (object), in the deep sleep also there is, according to this Upanishad and the KArikaa and bhashya, this duality of experiencer- experienced, in other words, subject-object, viShaya-viShayI. That the `viShaya-s', objects, in all the states, are mithya, is another matter. Nevertheless, in the state of ignorance, the division does exist. The adhyAsa-bhAshya starts with this distinction of the Consciousness-ViShayI (subject-seer) and the vishaya (object-seen) of the opposite characteristic. The `object' obtaining in deep sleep that is experienced by the sleeper-subject has been analyzed in the Vedanta shastra. For example, the Panchadashi, chapter 11 states this in the following manner: 58. A text of the Atharva Veda says: `In the state of deep sleep, when all the objects of experience have been absorbed and only darkness (Tamas) prevails, the Jiva enjoys bliss'. 59. A man from deep sleep remembers his happiness and ignorance and says: `I was sleeping happily; I knew nothing then'. 60. Recollection presupposes experience. So in sleep there was experience. The bliss experienced in dreamless sleep is revealed by consciousness itself which also reveals the undifferentiated ignorance (ajnana) covering bliss in that state. The Panchadashi continues: 62. The mind (mano-maya kosha) and the intellect sheaths (vijnana- maya kosha) are latent in the state called ignorance. Deep sleep is the condition in which these sheaths are latent and it is therefore a state of ignorance. 63. Just as melted butter again becomes solid, the two sheaths in the states following deep sleep again become manifest. The state in which the mind and intellect are latent is called the bliss-sheath (Ananda-maya kosha). 64.The modifications (Vritti) of the intellect in which, just before sleep, bliss is reflected becomes latent in the state of deep sleep along with the reflected bliss and is known as the bliss-sheath (Ananda-maya kosha). 65. This Vritti thus turned within, which is termed the bliss- sheath, enjoys the bliss reflected on it in association with the modifications of ignorance, catching the reflection of consciousness. 66. The adepts in Vedanta say that the modifications of ignorance are subtle, whereas those of the intellect are gross. 67. This is fully explained in the Mandukya and Tapaniya Upanishads. It is the sheath of bliss which is the enjoyer and it is the bliss of Brahman which is enjoyed. The Commentary clarifies: In deep sleep, the mano-maya and vijnAna-maya koshas are in resolved state. But the Anandamaya-kosha is very much there to experience the sleep state's contents of sukha and ajnana. When the man wakes up, the recollection expressed by him is: 'I slept happily; I did not know anything'. This recollection-expression is by the vijnaana- maya kosha that is now awake. The arthApatti (implicational/inferential) conclusion is: The Ananada-maya aspect of the mind that was awake in sleep state grasps the sukha and ajnana anubhava (which are the objects of the subject PrAjna) then and when waking occurs, expresses the experience through the vijnana- maya aspect of the mind. Thus, despite the resolving of all the objects and the instruments along with the mind in deep sleep, there is this undeniable experience of everyone in sleep which is later given expression to as `I slept happily; I did not know anything then' which the Mandukya bhashya confirms. The mechanism of this experience was explained above. The long and short of the analysis is: In deep sleep state there is the subject, experiencer, prAjna. For him there is the object, the experienced: sukha, bliss, and ajnana, ignorance. For someone who has listened to Swami Paramarthananda ji's Mandukya discourses, it is something unmistakable that he says: In sleep, the object is the `blankness'. This is called ignorance, ajnana. He uses the Tattvabodha concepts to explain this. There is the Reflected Consciousness (RC) and the Objectified Consciousness (OC) in each of the three states. RC 1, 2 and 3 for the three Experiencers (Subjects) and OC 1,2 and 3 to represent the three objects in the three states. Thus RC- 3 is the PrAjna and OC- 3 is the ajnana in deep sleep. In the Mandukya kArikA bhashya for I .2, the Acharya states in no unmistakable terms that: // the Brahman, in which the jiva gets resolved during deep sleep, is not shuddha-Brahman; it is the Brahman with the bija (kAraNa,, that is, it is the causal Brahman) of the yet-to-come universe. He reasons that if this Brahman were to be taken as nirbIja-Brahman, then there would be the absurdity of everyone going to sleep having to come out again. Moreover, the need for Vedantic knowledge to dispel ignorance will stand obviated. Therefore the Brahman in which the jiva resolves during sleep is sa-bija alone.// This shows that the jiva remains endowed with ignorance even during deep sleep. Conversely, the jiva is not divested of his basic ignorance in deep sleep as well. With humble pranams to all seekers, Subbu Om Tat Sat --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.