Guest guest Posted April 28, 2007 Report Share Posted April 28, 2007 Namaste, As I indulged in a rather enjoyable pastime, I wondered why people like turds of great consistancy rather than a time saving diarhea. This led me to think about the act of love, wiping by khyber pass would be. However before resorting to this love act, The thoughts of religion etc came to me. Religion is just a load of manipulative codswallop. Priests/Gurus are more interested in their codpieces then the ordinary walloper. Avatars are not God at all, its a load of bollocks. They are another being, and the idea is used to heavily influence the hoi polloi and manipulate them. Devotion is just a mental fixation like humans have fixations about sexual organs...just a bunch of galahs. In fact the whole thing is just a bunch of shite and not worth arguing about, for it is only as useful as the paper I use as an act of love for my arse. Which in the end just gets thrown in with the rest of the crap. These are enlightended revelations from the shitehouse, an important place for zen monks and drongos who couldn't give a shite........Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2007 Report Share Posted April 28, 2007 Hi Tony, It sounds like you have little respect for teachers and teachings. Do I understand you correctly? Or are you trying to espress soemthing else? Not two, Richard advaitajnana [advaitajnana ]On Behalf Of Tony OClerySaturday, April 28, 2007 2:50 PMadvaitajnana Subject: From the Shitehouse to the Lighthouse. Namaste,As I indulged in a rather enjoyable pastime, I wondered why peoplelike turds of great consistancy rather than a time saving diarhea.This led me to think about the act of love, wiping by khyber passwould be. However before resorting to this love act, The thoughts ofreligion etc came to me.Religion is just a load of manipulative codswallop.Priests/Gurus are more interested in their codpieces then the ordinarywalloper.Avatars are not God at all, its a load of bollocks. They are anotherbeing, and the idea is used to heavily influence the hoi polloi andmanipulate them.Devotion is just a mental fixation like humans have fixations aboutsexual organs...just a bunch of galahs.In fact the whole thing is just a bunch of shite and not worth arguingabout, for it is only as useful as the paper I use as an act of lovefor my arse. Which in the end just gets thrown in with the rest of thecrap.These are enlightended revelations from the shitehouse, an importantplace for zen monks and drongos who couldn't give a shite........Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 advaitajnana , " Richard Clarke " <richard wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > It sounds like you have little respect for teachers and teachings. Do I > understand you correctly? Or are you trying to espress soemthing else? > > Not two, > Richard > > advaitajnana [advaitajnana ]On > Behalf Of Tony OClery > Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:50 PM > advaitajnana > From the Shitehouse to the Lighthouse. > > > Namaste, > > As I indulged in a rather enjoyable pastime, I wondered why people > like turds of great consistancy rather than a time saving diarhea. > This led me to think about the act of love, wiping by khyber pass > would be. However before resorting to this love act, The thoughts of > religion etc came to me. > > Religion is just a load of manipulative codswallop. > > Priests/Gurus are more interested in their codpieces then the ordinary > walloper. > > Avatars are not God at all, its a load of bollocks. They are another > being, and the idea is used to heavily influence the hoi polloi and > manipulate them. > > Devotion is just a mental fixation like humans have fixations about > sexual organs...just a bunch of galahs. > > In fact the whole thing is just a bunch of shite and not worth arguing > about, for it is only as useful as the paper I use as an act of love > for my arse. Which in the end just gets thrown in with the rest of the > crap. > > These are enlightended revelations from the shitehouse, an important > place for zen monks and drongos who couldn't give a shite........Tony. Namaste, I have little respect for 99% of them but there are reliable ones also such as Nis Maharaj and Ramana Maharshi. The rest are mostly motivated by ego. Also in a Zen kind of way I was demonstrating aversion by the terms I couched the post in. All in all if spirituality was bullshit we would have a brass band in most cases...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 Dear Tony, Aren't you perhaps jumping to conclusions here? Have you met or listened to the 99% you condemn? As I read and meditate on Ramana's teaching, I notice that he would advise the seeker to concern himself with his own practice, rather than criticizing others. Perhaps that is a teaching that has some merit. Certainly ANY teacher who is teaching from ego needs to keep practicing. As should any of us seekers who speak from or assert ego. It also sounded as if you were critical of scripture as well. Am I understanding this as well? Also I notice not in your list of the 1% are such as Sankara, Yoga Vashista, etc. Not two, Richard advaitajnana [advaitajnana ]On Behalf Of Tony OClerySunday, April 29, 2007 8:15 AMadvaitajnana Subject: Re: From the Shitehouse to the Lighthouse. advaitajnana , "Richard Clarke" <richard wrote:>> Hi Tony,> > It sounds like you have little respect for teachers and teachings. Do I> understand you correctly? Or are you trying to espress soemthing else?> > Not two,> Richard> > advaitajnana [advaitajnana ]On> Behalf Of Tony OClery> Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:50 PM> advaitajnana > From the Shitehouse to the Lighthouse.> > > Namaste,> > As I indulged in a rather enjoyable pastime, I wondered why people> like turds of great consistancy rather than a time saving diarhea.> This led me to think about the act of love, wiping by khyber pass> would be. However before resorting to this love act, The thoughts of> religion etc came to me.> > Religion is just a load of manipulative codswallop.> > Priests/Gurus are more interested in their codpieces then the ordinary> walloper.> > Avatars are not God at all, its a load of bollocks. They are another> being, and the idea is used to heavily influence the hoi polloi and> manipulate them.> > Devotion is just a mental fixation like humans have fixations about> sexual organs...just a bunch of galahs.> > In fact the whole thing is just a bunch of shite and not worth arguing> about, for it is only as useful as the paper I use as an act of love> for my arse. Which in the end just gets thrown in with the rest of the> crap.> > These are enlightended revelations from the shitehouse, an important> place for zen monks and drongos who couldn't give a shite........Tony.Namaste,I have little respect for 99% of them but there are reliable ones alsosuch as Nis Maharaj and Ramana Maharshi. The rest are mostly motivatedby ego. Also in a Zen kind of way I was demonstrating aversion by theterms I couched the post in.All in all if spirituality was bullshit we would have a brass band inmost cases...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 advaitajnana , " Tony OClery " <aoclery wrote: > > advaitajnana , " Richard Clarke " <richard@> wrote: > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > It sounds like you have little respect for teachers and teachings. Do I > > understand you correctly? Or are you trying to espress soemthing else? > > > > Not two, > > Richard > > > > advaitajnana > [advaitajnana ]On > > Behalf Of Tony OClery > > Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:50 PM > > advaitajnana > > From the Shitehouse to the Lighthouse. > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > As I indulged in a rather enjoyable pastime, I wondered why people > > like turds of great consistancy rather than a time saving diarhea. > > This led me to think about the act of love, wiping by khyber pass > > would be. However before resorting to this love act, The thoughts of > > religion etc came to me. > > > > Religion is just a load of manipulative codswallop. > > > > Priests/Gurus are more interested in their codpieces then the ordinary > > walloper. > > > > Avatars are not God at all, its a load of bollocks. They are another > > being, and the idea is used to heavily influence the hoi polloi and > > manipulate them. > > > > Devotion is just a mental fixation like humans have fixations about > > sexual organs...just a bunch of galahs. > > > > In fact the whole thing is just a bunch of shite and not worth arguing > > about, for it is only as useful as the paper I use as an act of love > > for my arse. Which in the end just gets thrown in with the rest of the > > crap. > > > > These are enlightended revelations from the shitehouse, an important > > place for zen monks and drongos who couldn't give a shite........Tony. > > Namaste, > > I have little respect for 99% of them but there are reliable ones also > such as Nis Maharaj and Ramana Maharshi. The rest are mostly motivated > by ego. Also in a Zen kind of way I was demonstrating aversion by the > terms I couched the post in. > All in all if spirituality was bullshit we would have a brass band in > most cases...Tony. Namaste, Richard, I forget to mention the liklehood of UG Krishnamurthi as well. To me a guru is a jivanmukta and none other...Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 advaitajnana , " Richard Clarke " <richard wrote: > > Dear Tony, > > Aren't you perhaps jumping to conclusions here? Have you met or listened to > the 99% you condemn? > > As I read and meditate on Ramana's teaching, I notice that he would advise > the seeker to concern himself with his own practice, rather than criticizing > others. Perhaps that is a teaching that has some merit. > > Certainly ANY teacher who is teaching from ego needs to keep practicing. As > should any of us seekers who speak from or assert ego. > > It also sounded as if you were critical of scripture as well. Am I > understanding this as well? > > Also I notice not in your list of the 1% are such as Sankara, Yoga Vashista, > etc. > > Not two, > Richard Namaste, I cannot assess these old gurus very well, however the recent ones have been examined and reported more accurately. Sankara apparently didn't teach much further than Saguna Brahman. As I was thrown off the site by his devotees it is no wonder. I believe in Avatars if you go to my site, but they are person not a god descending. They are only one or 'god 'if they become a jivanmukta, some may do it at birth or close, and then that would be a purna avatar I suppose. I have no criticism for the other gurus, I either don't know them or I can't be bothered with them. There are about 13 lines directly attributed to Jesus in the NT and they built a whole religion on it. My measure of a guru other than a teacher is Jivanmukta or not...Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.