Fwd: Miracles and manifestations.

[Guest guest]

GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery wrote:

 

GuruRatings , ecirada <ecirada@> wrote:

>

> Tony OClery wrote:

> > GuruRatings , ecirada <ecirada@> wrote:

> >

> >> [...]

> >>>>> GuruRatings , ecirada <ecirada@> wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>>> Regarding telepathy, many cases might be required for proof

> >>>>>> but the case my (late) mother presented was one of them and

> >>>>>> beyond doubt.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> [..]

> >>>>>>

> >

> >

> > Namaste Jan,

> >

> > Ramana says that telepathy just adds to the proof of the mind

being

> > one.

> > When my kids were little they used to play telepathy games with

cards

> > they made. They became quite proficient at it;So much that they

used

> > to send each other pictures when they were trying to sleep as a

> > tease. As Ramana says the mind is one, egos are

separate........> >

> >

>

> For a scientist, contemplating an issue might lead to word it in a

way

> that can (re)open investigation. If what is termed 'mind' would be

> meaningful, it would make sense to propose it is one, in the same

> sense that 'space' has no boundaries but always contains what could

> be interpreted as 'boundaries'. IOW, rewording by the use of vague

> terms (ego for instance, often used as a put-down) serves

obfuscation,

> especially when an 'Ockham razor-proof' nondual description doesn't

> require such terminology.

>

> BTW Ramana also said that 'ego' is the 'I' thought and that

the 'mind'

> is a bundle of thoughts. IOW, take your pick! :-D

>

> Jan

>

Namaste Jan,

 

Rupert Sheldrake is the scientist who tries to explain the mind so to

speak with regard to species etc.

 

http://www.sheldrake.org/homepage.html

 

I think he is the most advanced scientist in this 'non spiritual'

thinking......

--- End forwarded message ---