Guest guest Posted January 22, 2009 Report Share Posted January 22, 2009 , " Tony OClery " <aoclery wrote: , " Richard " <richarkar@> wrote: > > Do me a favor Tony, turn the paranthesis around. > > " ...words not NirGuna Brahman,(or ultimate transcendental, > indescribable 'God', but still Saguna Brahman, ( or being or 'God' > associated with... " Richard, That's fine but the reason a use it with 'God' is that there isn't any God just ideas about a human desire that's all. Like religion--we are told it is necessary for the young and ignorant. On that basis how do the apes and animals get by---Without believing in a non existant God. They are smarter than humans apparently.. We call 'Personal God' in creation Saguna Brahman but in fact neither Saguna or creation ever happened.......there is only or isn't the negative Nir Guna Brahman...The idea of God comes from insecurity, and the wish for somebody taking ultimate responsibility for us. That is why 99.9% of people who claim to seeking moksha, couldnt handle it, if it was presented. Kind of like St Augusine of Hippos saying that he wonted realisation but not right now........Tony. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.