Guest guest Posted January 24, 2009 Report Share Posted January 24, 2009 , " Tony OClery " <aoclery wrote: , " mourad " <mourad_shamel@> wrote: > > > When religion was offered to man, every human recieved it according to > his spiritual maturity. What does not suite me today, might suite me > tomorrow and what suites me today, might not suite me tomorrow. Religion > is a large banquet, every man will take his fill. If man comes to > religion with an empty tea cup, he will only fill his tea cup. If man > comes to religion with a bucket, he will only fill the bucket. If man > comes to religion without his world and ego he will find a vast new > dimension where he will be resurrected afresh. It is never the fault of > religion, it is always the fault of man. > > mourad > > > , " Tony OClery " <aoclery@> > wrote: > > > > , Alan Jacobs > > alanadamsjacobs@ wrote: > > > > > > Guru Vachaka Kovai Bhagavan's Utterances Recorded by Murunagar. > > David Godman Edited Translation. > > > > > > P. 156 > > > No.342 > > > > > > " Various religions that enable [the attainment of Jmana] have come > > into existence to suit the various levels of mental maturity. The > > wisest course, therefore, is to have a harmonious outlook towards > > these religions, which deserve to be practised. " > > > > > Namaste, > > > > If they served the purpose properly but they don't it is all > > corrupted by egotistic pundits, priests and charlatans.........Also > > just because Ramana said it doesn't mean he is right as he hasn't > > dropped the body and speaks from experience, belief and > > karma.........He is hardly going to tell the truth to non > > understanding minds is he? ....Tony. Namaste, One has to understand in the first place religion is a man made organisation and structure of the mind, like any society. Organised religion only started circa 2000-2500 years ago, and not one was organised by its so called founders. Religion is just some people's ideas of how so called spirituality should be organised. When dealing with a Jivanmukta one should not make them into a 'God' they still have all the karma and ideas in the body/mind until it drops. All that has changed is their total view of things and the ego is not the main operator...the Sakti is. So somebody like Ramana can have individual tendencies and view that he always had, even though to get to the stage of a Mukta one has of course improved or purified the mind..He still got cancer after realisation as that was the nature of things karma or chaos.....Even an 'Avatar' is still a human. One has to understand that there is no 'Descending God'..So everything that a Mukta or Avatar says isn't the absolute truth but perhaps a guide. What is truth or right or wrong anyway but an idea? In the main religions especially the new islamic fundamentalism are not necessary at all. One can teach children and others without programming and making people believe in nonsense so as to build edifices, temples, churches, and line the pockets of pundits and priests..........Only one thing needs to be taught and that is AHIMSA, ALL ELSE FITS UNDER THAT, INCLUDING DAYA ETC....As Jesus said the 'Golden Rule' Do unto others............. --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.