Guest guest Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery wrote: GuruRatings , Sarlo <sarlo@> wrote: > > At 10:53 AM 4/7/09, Tony wrote: > > >The whole purpose is to return to the non-happening > > MY speculation is that, in almost all cases, when the phrase, > " The whole purpose is X " is uttered, we have entered into > philosophical speculation. This is NOT to say Tony is wrong > and some other philosphical speculation is better. > But if not recognised as philosphical speculation, > or at best a teaching device, its masquerade as " ultimate troof " > is ill-founded, as it becomes a brick in the positions > we create for our selves (gotta stake out a position). > Fundamentalism in another guise. > > Sarlo > Namaste Sarlo, I would say my ideas are the antithesis of fundamentalism as I am dumping all ideas but the negative neti neti. In fact I am denying all philosophy and thought completely. There can be no proof for what I am saying as it can only be described as NirGuna..Cheers --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.