The muktas uncertainty principal

[Guest guest]

>

> ******************

> Tales of Bhagavan as recounted by Chalam from Ramana Smriti

>

> People who expected the Supreme to be uniformly

> monotonous, acting in an invariable and stereotyped way, could

> not find their bearings when they had to deal with Bhagavan. He

> never reacted twice in the same way. The unexpected with him

> was inevitable. He would deny every expectation, go against

> every probability. He seemed to be completely indifferent to

> whatever was going on in the Ashram and would give an immense

> amount of care to some apparently insignificant detail. He would

> be highly critical of the Ashram manager's passion for

> improvement and expansion and yet take personal interest in the

> work of the carpenters and masons. He would scold his younger

> brother soundly, but would rebuke anybody who came to him

> with some complaint against him. He did not even want to hear

> about the money coming to the Ashram, but would read carefully

> the incoming and outgoing letters. He would refuse his consent

> to a certain work, but if it were done against his wishes, he would

> earnestly cooperate. When asked to agree to the building of the

> temple, he said, " Do as you please, but do not use my name for

> collecting money " . Yet he would closely watch the progress of

> the work and wander in the night among the scaffolding, with

> his torch in one hand and his stick in the other. When the Sri

> Chakra was placed in the sanctum of the temple, he went there

> at midnight and laid his hands on it. He would deny all

> responsibility for starting and developing the Ashram, would

> refuse to claim it as his property, but signed a will creating a

> hereditary managership for the Ashram. He would refuse all

> treatment when asked, but would swallow any medicine that

> was given to him without asking. If each well-wisher offered

> his own remedy, he would take them all at the same time. He

> would relish some rustic dish and would turn away from costly

> delicacies. He would invite people for food, but when asked

> for a meal he would plead his helplessness in the matter.

> Sometimes he would take a man to the kitchen and cook and

> serve him with his own hands. He insisted that beggars should

> be fed first, but would say that the Ashram was for visitors, not

> for beggars. He would be tender with a sick squirrel and would

> not outwardly show any feeling when an old and faithful devotee

> was dying. A serious loss or damage would leave him

> unconcerned, while he may shout warnings lest a glass pane in

> a cupboard should break. Greatness, wealth, beauty, power,

> penance, fame, philanthropy — all these would make no

> impression on him, but a lame monkey would absorb him for

> days on end. He would ignore a man for a long time and then

> suddenly turn to him with a broad smile and start an animated

> discussion. To a question about life after death he would retort,

> `Who is asking'? but to another man he would explain in great

> detail what death was and what the state of mind was after

> death. It was clear that all he did was rooted in some hidden

> centre to which none of us had any access. He was entirely

> self-directed, or rather, Self-directed.

> ******************

 

Namaste,

 

Yes this nearer the 'chaotic' condition of this illusion.

 

Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty in scientific terms.

 

It seems the Mukta reflects the minds around him/her. Having no personal ego to

order things to one's liking, the mukta has vijnanamayakosa being used as mind

by the Sakti. Daya for the lame monkey, or sick squirrel but indifference to the

dying devotee...Daya for the monkey is more real dying is not. There is neither

right nor wrong but thinking that makes it so. I'm not sure that self directd is

the right word,,,for it is the sakti mind or kundalini that is everywhere,

reflecting the individual egos. The mukta lives and acts soley in the 'Now',

hence the seeming contradictions. The mukta is aware of the fact it is all a

total illusion that never happened....Cheers Tony.