Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Salt Doll Simile

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hello, I am new to this group but a long-time student of the

teachings of Ramana Maharshi. About 20 years ago I discovered Ramana

in the book " A Search in Secret India. " I instantly realized that

the light of essential reality (as just pure being) was shinning

without obstruction from Ramana. Here was a being with direct

knowledge of the absolute reality. No hob goblins, no detours, no

nonsense, just a direct connection to the essence of reality... I am.

 

Question: can someone explain the following analogy attributed to

Ramana in " Talks " page 2?

 

***************************************************************

Talk 5.

 

Mr. M. Frydman, an engineer, remarked on the subject of Grace, " A

salt doll diving into the sea will not be protected by a waterproof

coat " .

 

It was a very happy simile and was applauded as such. Maharshi

added, " The body is the waterproof coat. "

 

***************************************************************

 

What confuses me is that a truly waterproof coat that prevented any

water from touching the salt doll would protect it from dissolving

into the sea (if dissolution is what it's not protected from). So I

don't understand how the statement to the effect that a waterproof

coat would not protect the doll is accurate. I can only assume

Ramana means a coat that does not completely protect the doll from

the water; but then why say " waterproof " ? Even under this assumption

I don't fully see the point being made since there's almost no

context provided in the book.

 

Thanks for providing this forum and keeping Ramana's wisdom alive!

 

http://IanGoddard.net

 

" Our greatest illusion is to believe that we are what

we think ourselves to be. " Henri Amiel (1821-1881)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> " Ian Goddard " <iamgoddard

>

>

> Salt Doll Simile

>Mon, 26 May 2003 21:12:40 -0000

>

>Hello, I am new to this group but a long-time student of the

>teachings of Ramana Maharshi. About 20 years ago I discovered Ramana

>in the book " A Search in Secret India. " I instantly realized that

>the light of essential reality (as just pure being) was shinning

>without obstruction from Ramana. Here was a being with direct

>knowledge of the absolute reality. No hob goblins, no detours, no

>nonsense, just a direct connection to the essence of reality... I am.

>

>Question: can someone explain the following analogy attributed to

>Ramana in " Talks " page 2?

>

>***************************************************************

>Talk 5.

>

> Mr. M. Frydman, an engineer, remarked on the subject of Grace, " A

>salt doll diving into the sea will not be protected by a waterproof

>coat " .

>

> It was a very happy simile and was applauded as such. Maharshi

>added, " The body is the waterproof coat. "

>

>***************************************************************

>

>What confuses me is that a truly waterproof coat that prevented any

>water from touching the salt doll would protect it from dissolving

>into the sea (if dissolution is what it's not protected from). So I

>don't understand how the statement to the effect that a waterproof

>coat would not protect the doll is accurate. I can only assume

>Ramana means a coat that does not completely protect the doll from

>the water; but then why say " waterproof " ? Even under this assumption

>I don't fully see the point being made since there's almost no

>context provided in the book.

>

>Thanks for providing this forum and keeping Ramana's wisdom alive!

>

>http://IanGoddard.net

>

> " Our greatest illusion is to believe that we are what

>we think ourselves to be. " Henri Amiel (1821-1881)

>

>

>

 

does

your

coat

protect

your

head

from

getting

wet,

your

feet

your

hands?

doll=ego...I-thought

coat=world...this-thought

once

the

wetnness

of

water

touches

anypart

of

the

doll

it

starts

to

dissolve

from

within

once

eternal

ocean

of

Brahman

touches

" I "

it

dissolves

in

same

way

who

wants

to

know

is

the

only

legit

question

Yours

in

That

elijah

 

_______________

STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Re: /message/334

 

" elijah blue " wrote:

 

> does

> your

> coat

> protect

> your

> head

> from

> getting

> wet,

> your

> feet

> your

> hands?

 

IAN: If it was a coat that made me waterproof, yes. But

I see your point: the coat is not perfectly waterproof.

 

 

> doll=ego...I-thought

> coat=world...this-thought

> once

> the

> wetnness

> of

> water

> touches

> anypart

> of

> the

> doll

> it

> starts

> to

> dissolve

> from

> within

> once

> eternal

> ocean

> of

> Brahman

> touches

> " I "

> it

> dissolves

> in

> same

> way

> who

> wants

> to

> know

> is

> the

> only

> legit

> question

> Yours

> in

> That

 

 

IAN: Yes, the dissolution of the salt doll into the ocean

of Brahman seems obviously implied. I guess what I don't

immediately see is how that ties in with Mr Frydman's

having " remarked on the subject of Grace. " What does he

mean by " Grace " and how does that tie in with the doll?

In short, I don't see how the simile is being applied.

 

http://IanGoddard.net

 

" Our greatest illusion is to believe that we are what

we think ourselves to be. " Henri Amiel (1821-1881)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> IAN: Yes, the dissolution of the salt doll into

> the ocean

> of Brahman seems obviously implied. I guess what I

> don't

> immediately see is how that ties in with Mr

> Frydman's

> having " remarked on the subject of Grace. " What

> does he

> mean by " Grace " and how does that tie in with the

> doll?

> In short, I don't see how the simile is being

> applied.

>

>

how

does

the

salt

doll

fall

into

the

ocean?

how

do

you

come

to

this

teaching?

Who

is

the

questioner?

Understanding

the

similies

are

not

the

point.

The

ego

wants

to

use

similies

to

understand

what

is

beyond

thought...

Grace

alone

is

You

Are

That

shhhhh

monkeymind

look

within

HisGraceisYOUR-SELF

 

 

 

The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

http://search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

> >

> > IAN: Yes, the dissolution of the salt doll into

> > the ocean

> > of Brahman seems obviously implied. I guess what I

> > don't

> > immediately see is how that ties in with Mr

> > Frydman's

> > having " remarked on the subject of Grace. " What

> > does he

> > mean by " Grace " and how does that tie in with the

> > doll?

> > In short, I don't see how the simile is being

> > applied.

 

one

more

idea,

how

does

the

ocean

dissolve

the

saltdoll?

is

there

any

effort

on

the

part

of

the

ocean?

Grace

is

yours

dive

within

That

you

Are

 

_______________

The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> ***************************************************************

> Talk 5.

>

> Mr. M. Frydman, an engineer, remarked on the subject of

Grace, " A

> salt doll diving into the sea will not be protected by a

waterproof

> coat " .

>

> It was a very happy simile and was applauded as such. Maharshi

> added, " The body is the waterproof coat. "

>

> ***************************************************************

 

 

That's from " Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi " (Sri Ramanashramam,

2000, page 2).

 

" Thus Spake Ramana " (page 82) cites the salt-doll simile as follows:

 

" 88. A salt doll diving into the sea will not be protected by a

waterproof coat. The body is the waterproof coat. You see objects on

forgetting your own Self. If you keep hold of your Self, you will

not see the objective world. "

 

While this text omits the part about Mr Frydman's remark on grace,

the additional sentences result in a cohesive simile that appears to

say: when the subjective identity (mind) dissolves, all objective

identities (which are merely mental constructs) also dissolve.

 

http://IanGoddard.net

 

" Our greatest illusion is to believe that we are what

we think ourselves to be. " Henri Amiel (1821-1881)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...