Guest guest Posted December 28, 2003 Report Share Posted December 28, 2003 D. If the jnani and the ajnani perceive the world in like manner, where is the difference between them? Maharshi: Seeing the world, the jnani sees the Self which is the substartum of all that is seen; the ajnani , whether he sees the world or not is ignorant of his true being, the Self. Take the instance of the movie pictures on the screen in the cinema show. What is there in front of you before the play begins? Merely the screen. On that screen you see the entire show, and for all appearances the pictures are real. But go and try to take hold of them. What do you take hold of? Merely the screen on which the pictures appeared so real. After the play, when the pictures disappear, what remains? The screen again! So with the Self. That alone exists; the pictures come and go. If you hold on to the Self, you will not be deceived by the appearance of the pictures. Nor does it matter at all if the pictures appear or disappear. Ignoring the Self, the ajnani thinks the world is real, just as, ignoring the screen, he sees merely the pictures, as if they existed apart from it. If one knows that without the seer there is nothing to be seen, just as there are no pictures without the screen,one is not deluded. The jnani knows that the screen, the pictures, and the sight thereof are but the Self. With the pictures, the Self is in its manifest form; without the pictures It remains in the unmanifest form. To the jnani it is quite immaterial if the Self is in the one form or the other. He is always the Self. But the ajnani, seeing the jnani active, gets confounded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.