Guest guest Posted June 17, 2006 Report Share Posted June 17, 2006 ........................... The twofold possibility of finding a realized Guru and observing the orthodoxy of whatever religion he professed must have seemed pretty remote to many of Guenon’s readers at the time when he wrote; it is vastly more so today, in view of the rapid breakdown of tradition, drying up of spiritual streams and acceptance of modernism not only in the West but throughout the world and in all religions. To prevent despondency, Guenon gave the assurance that Christ’s saying that whoever seeks shall find is a divine law of universal application. This implies, however, that there must be some technique by which it can still apply even in this present age, when a genuine guru has become so rare to find and orthodoxy, for most people, impracticable. Guenon never suggested what this technique might be or even seemed aware of the need for one. The adaptation necessary to meet the conditions of the new age was, of course, formless guidance, to which I referred briefly in ‘Adventures on the Path’, such as could reach the heart of whoever seeks, independent alike of religious orthodoxy and formal initiation. There may be various such currents of guidance in the world today; certainly one was instituted by the Maharshi. In accordance with the needs of this path, he restored the term ‘Guru’ to its true and highest meaning, which is essentially the same as the Christian doctrine of ‘the Christ in you’. This introduced a certain mystery into his use of the term. The following dialogue illustrates how it made the laying on of hands or transmission of a mantram by a human agent unnecessary: Devotee: “Bhagavan has said that without the grace of the Guru one cannot attain to the Self. What precisely does he mean by this? What is this Guru?” Bhagavan: “From the standpoint of the path of Knowledge, it is the supreme state of the Self. It is different from the ego, which you call your self.” Devotee: “Then if it is the supreme state of my own Self, in what sense does Bhagavan mean that I cannot reach it without the grace of the Guru?” Bhagavan: “The ego is the individuality and is not the same as the Lord of all. When it approaches the Lord with sincere devotion, he graciously assumes name and form and takes it to Himself. Therefore they say that the Guru is none other than the Lord. He is a human incarnation of Divine Grace.” A human incarnation, yes; but he also said that the Guru need not necessarily take human form; and since he shed the body the meaning of this saying has become clear. ............................. taken from Arthur Osborne's My Life & Quest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.