Guest guest Posted October 3, 2007 Report Share Posted October 3, 2007 ....... Finally with regard to the doctrine of grace, Christian criticism of Hindu theology asserts that Hinduism advocates “pulling oneself up by one’s own bootstraps” without assistance from the love of God. Such a statement is, in my opinion, unfair; but let us look at one of Christ’s teachings”For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance; but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.” (Matthew, XIII, 12). In other words, “In accordance with each man’s own efforts for spiritual enlightenment shall he be given assistance by God; and those who make no effort shall lose even what spiritual understanding they had.” Surely this means that Divine Grace is dependent on effort; and what true Hindu, whether Shaivite or Vaishnavite, would deny such a teaching? However, we are not concerned with a defence of “orthodox” Hinduism; in many respects it is farther from the truth than orthodox Christianity. But Bhagavan Sri Maharshi answers this riddle of self-help and grace in final fashion, in my view. In Sat- Darshana Bhashya and Talks with Maharshi we find: “Disciple: Then I can dispense with outside help and by mine own effort get into the deeper truth by myself? Maharshi: True. But the very fact you are possessed of the quest of the Self is a manifestation of the Divine Grace, It is effulgent in the Heart, the inner being, the Real Self. It draws you from within. You have to attempt to get in from without. Your attempt is Vichara, the deep inner movement is Grace, That is why I say there is no real Vichara without Grace, nor is there Grace active for him who is without Vichara. Both are necessary.’’ And there are several other similar examples in the same work and elsewhere in the Maharshi’s writings. To remove the blinkers from men’s eyes, to take away their spiritual crutches is a great, though painful, task. Men generally are unwilling to surrender their long-cherished illusions, whether based on nineteenth century materialism still so widespread and, indeed, spreading in India or on orthodox religion. It is painful and lonely to be told that you must strip your soul naked and depend only on yourself and the divine inner Grace which Christ called the Holy Ghost if you seek spiritual liberation; that no amount of prayers or saying ‘credo’ can take the place of this lone pilgrimage. Most men are unwilling to make, or rarely feel the need of making such a search. To them one can only say “Depart in peace.” For such persons it is useless to visit Sri Maharshi’s ashram for darshan, in the hope that this in itself will liberate one. That is only a beginning, an inspiration the long, stony path lies ahead. It is a tenet of Hinduism that all spiritual paths lead to the same goal. In a broad sense this is true, but also it hides the truth. For if one has followed one religion or another, one yoga or another, one has still in the end to go through the process of self-analysis, of inner search and surrender which is best described in our time by Sri Maharshi. In other words, the “goal” is not a goal but a path. When one has learnt everything that one can from one’s inherited or acquired religion or spiritual discipline, he has to take this prized possession and cast it to one side the most painful of acts and, starting afresh, follow the simple, scientific method that the Saint of Arunachala teaches us. .................to be continued taken from Golden Jubilee Souvenir 1896-1946 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.