Guest guest Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Dear Kaushik ji, Have you read the Tulsidasa Ramayana ? before you talk on the Valmiki Ramayana ? You wrote that you are just 26 years old, and you know I am about 49 years old, and many members are more elder than me ? Then are we all idiots ? Have you read the Sunderkand about which you are quoting ? If You have than You will know about " Nal and Neela ", and you will stop talking about Valmiki Ramayana which has no authenticity ? You wrote that I have not kicked you out of the Group - Yes thats true. If it as somebody else, I would have done so long ago. But I know that you are a innocent person, but just mis-directed which is why You are still here. regards, Bhaskar. , "kaushik_buddy" <kaushik_buddy wrote:>> > > > Firstly i encourage your stand on Sactity of our scriptures.Like we all> know the proverb"What we know is little and what we have to know is> infinite".> > > > Before i say any thing on me as per "/We need to rise above the level> of vulnerability> when no amount of blasphemy can affect us. We just got a lesson> through a recent episode in the group/".> > None could use the rationality behind why i posted it.> > When some one posted this-"When Ram Sethu was being constructed across> the sea, at a particular stretch, all the stones dropped did not build> up to the surface and all were worried how to close the gap. When Rama> asked people to go under the ocean and see what the problem is, Hanuman> volunteered and dived into the sea.> > Surprisingly he saw an entire civilisation and people living there with> a King, his subjects..etc. When they found a strange looking Hanuman,> the people took him to their King and Hanuman informed him of the> purpose of his coming..etc.> > The King replied "So you are the one throwing stones from the top"? OK,> we will agree to help you, provided you agree to marry my daughter and> live with us- perhaps it Varuna Bhagwan?> > Hanuman replied he was a Brahmachari and would not marry anyone. But the> King insisted that he would allow him to leave only if he married the> princess. At last Hanuman agreed, married the princess on assurance that> she will be with her parents only after marriage, and surfaced back to> Ram and Lakshman to complete the assignment.> > So, people in South East Asian Countries have the version of Ramayana> and celebrate it with all enthusiasm and consider the great Hanuman as a> Brahmachari but married once to the undersea kingdom princess!!> > When you travel to these Countries you can see for yourselves these> events"> > I just replied it that the story is very badly created on Hanuman ji> ,with soo much false hood.> > Offened for what??? Read Valmiki Ramayana, Sundhara Khanda - 24 - 9, You> will know what relation i meant about Suwarchal Matha .You will know> that i didnt refer to a LADY.and in what context Hanuman comes here. I> can GIVE much clear one but i dotn want to bcoz the way of your> perception.> > Lastly it is not bcoz i am offended by seeing few praises going on me> and my so called "Anserine approach"i am replying now, but bcoz im a> hindu im even am entitled with more responsibiltyto respect my> scritoures.BUT what dd i defame?> > Do u know what adi shankara wrote on the same topic i am contravened> upon?[bcoz u seem to have read shankara pada writtings] we will bow down> with respect on what he wrote about that and what a great Bramhachari> Hanumatha was and was his relation with sun's glow! I know again u wil> take it in Bad sense!Sorry i know this will again give raise to few> posts leaving few comments about me.> > No offense meant on any one, bcoz one thing is for sure -I only take> your reactions on me only from the dimension that ,you all love that> kapi raj too.> > Dear Bhaskar ji, you are doing a great service and this group will soon> become a mirror of your selfless service for Many many people who take> shelter in their fate-as atleast people realise that there is some thing> beyond their thoughts , and in that mood they enter your group.There> your r ready to take up their problems and steering their fate to beyond> trouble.I dont want to trouble you sir, and also to such people who come> for you.> > Its ok if i cant do good, but it wil be worse if i do bad.> > I really appreciate your way of approach-Though i know your like> aadishesh{get angry soon]but cool down instantly-I RESPECT YOUR> PATIENCE,Bcoz even after feeling soo much offended by percieving what i> posted, you still didnt kick me out of the group.> > For that i offer pranam again.> > Hope all elders bless me yah im 26 years old and i know i need them from> every one of you.> > Bye> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Dear Buddy ji, Please can you find out for me - 1) When was the Tulsidasa Ramayan written ? 2) When was the Valmiki Ramayana written ? 3) Have you heard of a story about Ram and Lakshman guiding someones hut with their bow and arrows ? Can you tell me what was the story - complete ? Can you say whether this story was authenticated by the erstwhile ruler of those times ? 4) What are your views - how much time does it take for a text to be corrupted with the ravages of time ? regards, Bhaskar. , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Dear Kaushik ji,> > Have you read the Tulsidasa Ramayana ? before you talk on the Valmiki> Ramayana ?> > You wrote that you are just 26 years old, and you know I am about 49> years old, and many members are more elder than me ?> > Then are we all idiots ?> > Have you read the Sunderkand about which you are quoting ? If You have> than You will know about " Nal and Neela ", and you will stop talking> about Valmiki Ramayana which has no authenticity ?> > You wrote that I have not kicked you out of the Group - Yes thats true.> If it as somebody else, I would have done so long ago. But I know that> you are a innocent person, but just mis-directed which is why You are> still here.> > regards,> > Bhaskar.> > > > > > > > > , "kaushik_buddy"> kaushik_buddy@ wrote:> >> >> >> >> > Firstly i encourage your stand on Sactity of our scriptures.Like we> all> > know the proverb"What we know is little and what we have to know is> > infinite".> >> >> >> > Before i say any thing on me as per "/We need to rise above the level> > of vulnerability> > when no amount of blasphemy can affect us. We just got a lesson> > through a recent episode in the group/".> >> > None could use the rationality behind why i posted it.> >> > When some one posted this-"When Ram Sethu was being constructed across> > the sea, at a particular stretch, all the stones dropped did not build> > up to the surface and all were worried how to close the gap. When Rama> > asked people to go under the ocean and see what the problem is,> Hanuman> > volunteered and dived into the sea.> >> > Surprisingly he saw an entire civilisation and people living there> with> > a King, his subjects..etc. When they found a strange looking Hanuman,> > the people took him to their King and Hanuman informed him of the> > purpose of his coming..etc.> >> > The King replied "So you are the one throwing stones from the top"?> OK,> > we will agree to help you, provided you agree to marry my daughter and> > live with us- perhaps it Varuna Bhagwan?> >> > Hanuman replied he was a Brahmachari and would not marry anyone. But> the> > King insisted that he would allow him to leave only if he married the> > princess. At last Hanuman agreed, married the princess on assurance> that> > she will be with her parents only after marriage, and surfaced back to> > Ram and Lakshman to complete the assignment.> >> > So, people in South East Asian Countries have the version of Ramayana> > and celebrate it with all enthusiasm and consider the great Hanuman as> a> > Brahmachari but married once to the undersea kingdom princess!!> >> > When you travel to these Countries you can see for yourselves these> > events"> >> > I just replied it that the story is very badly created on Hanuman ji> > ,with soo much false hood.> >> > Offened for what??? Read Valmiki Ramayana, Sundhara Khanda - 24 - 9,> You> > will know what relation i meant about Suwarchal Matha .You will know> > that i didnt refer to a LADY.and in what context Hanuman comes here. I> > can GIVE much clear one but i dotn want to bcoz the way of your> > perception.> >> > Lastly it is not bcoz i am offended by seeing few praises going on me> > and my so called "Anserine approach"i am replying now, but bcoz im a> > hindu im even am entitled with more responsibiltyto respect my> > scritoures.BUT what dd i defame?> >> > Do u know what adi shankara wrote on the same topic i am contravened> > upon?[bcoz u seem to have read shankara pada writtings] we will bow> down> > with respect on what he wrote about that and what a great Bramhachari> > Hanumatha was and was his relation with sun's glow! I know again u wil> > take it in Bad sense!Sorry i know this will again give raise to few> > posts leaving few comments about me.> >> > No offense meant on any one, bcoz one thing is for sure -I only take> > your reactions on me only from the dimension that ,you all love that> > kapi raj too.> >> > Dear Bhaskar ji, you are doing a great service and this group will> soon> > become a mirror of your selfless service for Many many people who take> > shelter in their fate-as atleast people realise that there is some> thing> > beyond their thoughts , and in that mood they enter your group.There> > your r ready to take up their problems and steering their fate to> beyond> > trouble.I dont want to trouble you sir, and also to such people who> come> > for you.> >> > Its ok if i cant do good, but it wil be worse if i do bad.> >> > I really appreciate your way of approach-Though i know your like> > aadishesh{get angry soon]but cool down instantly-I RESPECT YOUR> > PATIENCE,Bcoz even after feeling soo much offended by percieving what> i> > posted, you still didnt kick me out of the group.> >> > For that i offer pranam again.> >> > Hope all elders bless me yah im 26 years old and i know i need them> from> > every one of you.> >> > Bye> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.