Guest guest Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 There has been an unending debate about free will and destiny, very much like solving the riddle of what came first chicken or egg?Hard core rationalist insists there is nothing like destiny,only free will matters and a hard core astrologer would swear by his life that everything is destiny.There are no absolutes in the manifest world.There is only one absolute state of being which is nirgun,nirakar brahm(ek meva advitiyam), everything else is manifestation of its potential and therefore is necessarily experienced relative to that state.The only difference is that the absolute state of being is sat,chit and anand( isness,pure conciousness and anand which actually means total peace free of any reverberations(spandan)and hence very naturally not knowing anything(it does not need to,you can't even call it it). Whereas the manisfest state which expresses the knowing capacity of the absolute state forgets in its knowing its totally unknowing absolute state.Having forgotten this it identifies with the form acquired and lo behold you have the play of duality in full bloom Ahamkara vs Samsara. The bewildering magic of the game starts unfolding to the ahamkara as it starts to EXPERIENCE(because of its knowing capacity) its own form as well as all forms around it.Remember having forgotten its original non manifest,non dual state it is a natural outcome that it experiences its existence as distinctly different from other manifest forms.This magic is MAYA. The key word to note is EXPERIENCE which gives the manifest form capacity to LEARN while the manifest form exists.What is it trying to learn? How to achieve again that state of sat,chit and anand and complete the cycle of non manifest to manifest and back to non manifest.In this journey the form is always given the CHOICE to LEARN from its experiences.This CHOICE to LEARN is FREE WILL. Its learning will determine what kind of form and conditions it will encounter in the journey ahead. If it refuses to learn it is made to revisit the same experience again and again until it learns.It is very much like a computer game that requires the player to become competent enough at a lower level to be allowed to play the same game at a higher level of difficulty.The experiences that the form has to revisit for non learning and the price it has to pay for non learning despite having been given the opportunity to do so is DESTINY. JYOTISH is the only science that can reconcile the two FREE WILL and DESTINY. HOW? Some other time.... AUM NAMO NARAYANAYA Saumil Trivedi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 Dear Saumil ji, Sorry I could not contact you earlier, as your postings are contained of deep profound wisdom and wanted to enjoy this in a serene atmosphere which I usually find at night, before I could reply to you. What you have written as under - // This CHOICE to LEARN is FREE WILL. // is what sums it up in the best understandable language for one and all. Remaining dormant or static, which is stationary is easy, but moving ahead in face of challenges, uncooperative circumstances around us, and shifting our priorities and changing our approaches continously to the conditions which we cannot bring about a change in, is what is Free will. Those who can do this are using their Fee will, in the best manner possible, while the others have to come back again for another round. best wishes, Bhaskar. , " trivedi_saumil " <saumil.trivedi wrote: > > There has been an unending debate about free will and destiny, very much like solving the riddle of what came first chicken or egg?Hard core rationalist insists there is nothing like destiny,only free will matters and a hard core astrologer would swear by his life that everything is destiny.There are no absolutes in the manifest world.There is only one absolute state of being which is nirgun,nirakar brahm(ek meva advitiyam), everything else is manifestation of its potential and therefore is necessarily experienced relative to that state.The only difference is that the absolute state of being is sat,chit and anand( isness,pure conciousness and anand which actually means total peace free of any reverberations(spandan)and hence very naturally not knowing anything(it does not need to,you can't even call it it). Whereas the manisfest state which expresses the knowing capacity of the absolute state forgets in its knowing its totally unknowing absolute state.Having forgotten this it identifies with the form acquired and lo behold you have the play of duality in full bloom Ahamkara vs Samsara. > The bewildering magic of the game starts unfolding to the ahamkara as it starts to EXPERIENCE(because of its knowing capacity) its own form as well as all forms around it.Remember having forgotten its original non manifest,non dual state it is a natural outcome that it experiences its existence as distinctly different from other manifest forms.This magic is MAYA. > The key word to note is EXPERIENCE which gives the manifest form capacity to LEARN while the manifest form exists.What is it trying to learn? How to achieve again that state of sat,chit and anand and complete the cycle of non manifest to manifest and back to non manifest.In this journey the form is always given the CHOICE to LEARN from its experiences.This CHOICE to LEARN is FREE WILL. Its learning will determine what kind of form and conditions it will encounter in the journey ahead. If it refuses to learn it is made to revisit the same experience again and again until it learns.It is very much like a computer game that requires the player to become competent enough at > a lower level to be allowed to play the same game at a higher level of difficulty.The experiences that the form has to revisit for non learning and the price it has to pay for non learning despite having been given the opportunity to do so is DESTINY. JYOTISH is the only science that can reconcile the two FREE WILL and DESTINY. > HOW? Some other time.... > AUM NAMO NARAYANAYA > Saumil Trivedi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2009 Report Share Posted May 29, 2009 Dear Bhaskar ji, Saumil ji,Sharing some thoughts on this:Our scriptures say, Avashyameva Bhoktaavyam kritam shubha shubham. And this is governed by the Law of Karma. A jeev is born to enjoy or suffer his previous karmas. Since previous karmas cannot be changed, the matter seems to be closed for any further rectification. But the soul also has to progress on the future path for which it must have a free hand to perform certain karmas which are not ordained. Destiny, the destination of soul as it implies, has been rather loosely dealt with when we are trying to see it with the eyes of Jyotisha. Any happening, big or small, is not destiny per se, but is a stitch in the pattern of life to make it whole. And every stitch is meticulously made by our karmas, of which some are governed by previous karmas and are fixed, we call them dridh karmas, some are adridh karmas which have a limited flexibility and the kriyamaan karmas provide the larger ground of freewill. Osho, in his discourse ‘Astrology: A Door to Religiousness’ has explained this same principle in his inimitable style. He divides these as core areas, in-between areas and the peripheral issues. Astrology, according to him deals with the essential issues or the core areas. Some excerpts from his discourse which is available at the AIA site: //////////OSHO says:...So there are three areas of life. In one area, that which is the essential core, everything is predetermined. Knowing this is knowing the essence of astrology. In another area, that which is peripheral, everything is uncertain. To know this is to know the everyday unpredictable world. There is another area which is in the middle. By knowing this, a person can save himself from trying to do the impossible, and can do what is possible. If a person lives in the peripheral and middle areas in such a way that he begins to move towards the center, he will become religious. But if he lives in such a way that he is never able to move towards the center, his life will remain irreligious. For example, a person is preparing to steal. Stealing is not predetermined; it can’t be claimed that stealing is inevitable or unavoidable, there is complete freedom whether to steal or not. But once stealing has been committed, it is as if one foot has been lifted and the other foot remains on the earth: after doing it, you cannot undo the act. And the total effect of the act of stealing will spread over the personality of the person who did it. But as long as stealing is not done, the other alternative is present and available The mind of a person swings between yes and no. If he says yes, he will be thrown towards the periphery; if he says no, he will move towards the center. Thus, in the middle, there is a choice. If he makes a wrong choice he is thrown towards the periphery; if he makes a right choice he moves towards the center, towards that part of astrology which is essential in life. ////////////////RegardsNeelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.