Guest guest Posted January 30, 2008 Report Share Posted January 30, 2008 Dear Tanvir ji, Could you please give some thought to the suggestions made by Shri Rohiniranjan ji that: [ a ] Those who seek advice in the group should NOT address their request to any particular astrologer. If they want to seek help from any particular astrologer they should contact the astrologer privately. [ b ] That a request can be answered by more than one astrologer and it should NOT be construed as ‘stealing clients’. [ c ] The astrologers should desist from criticizing the analysis of the other brother astrologers. Most of the group members already agree with the suggestions made by shri Rohiniranjan ji. If you also agree with these suggestions, then could you please incorporate them in the introduction of the group. Sincerely, Roopak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2008 Report Share Posted January 30, 2008 Dear Shri Tanvirji , Am in Delhi just now, and had a few cursoty glances on the posts made over here. You must check first who are the people advising you, and what have been their previous posts and the contents. Points should be taken into consideration- 1) Who are they to advise you on what should be the guidelines for the Forum ? Does it carry any weight of advise through, experience, contribution or co-ownership of this Forum, that they have the strength to advise you ? Have they become the co-owners or Your Prime advisors by doing nothing but just abusing Bhaskar (Calling him Psychc " " Sick " ) etc ? 2)Why should one be asked to contact any astrologer privately ? This " asking " business has not to come through anyone including the owner. Instead the private communication should be the sole criterion resting on the Native alone. Why must the owner or the Forum Moderator advise this to members ? Is he getting some commissions on the business coming to the astrologers by asking the natives to contact the astrologers privately ? No Sir, your reputation must not be tarnished. We are not supposed to advise this. 3) This term " stealing clients " has been read by us only recently in these few weeks. If one checks the messages, one would realise, that the advisors themselves have coined this term. The advisors are a gang of people who may be real or fake ids, but working for common cause. 4) One who is advising you to put the guideline that one astrologer should desist from criticising the analysis of other brother astrologers . Kindly ask this advisor first of all why does he use the choicest of adjectives for astrologers, like he used for me, and also who is he to ask You to implement this advise? Putting this advise here would mean, that any Tom Dick and Harry would come an act like a astrologer and give readings without any basic education. And if this rule is implemented then we can just look like silent robots whenever any wrong reading is made, and do nothing. Sir, we do not need advisors. India is full of advisors giving unasked for free advise. If they have to, then let it be a astrological one. Do not allow these fellows to become anyones boss here. The Boss remains only one. KIng Tanvir. I am happy with his rules and respect them. Those who are not , must stop advising or leave, if they cannot resist advising. kind regards, Bhaskar. , " roopak.rastogi " <roopak.rastogi wrote: > > Dear Tanvir ji, > > Could you please give some thought to the suggestions made by Shri > Rohiniranjan ji that: > > [ a ] Those who seek advice in the group should NOT address their > request to any particular astrologer. If they want to seek help from > any particular astrologer they should contact the astrologer > privately. > > [ b ] That a request can be answered by more than one astrologer and > it should NOT be construed as ‘stealing clients’. > > [ c ] The astrologers should desist from criticizing the analysis of > the other brother astrologers. > > Most of the group members already agree with the suggestions made by > shri Rohiniranjan ji. If you also agree with these suggestions, then > could you please incorporate them in the introduction of the group. > > Sincerely, > > Roopak > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2008 Report Share Posted January 30, 2008 Moderator Sir, I agree with the constructive suggestions made by Rohiniranjan ji. I hope you will give a thought to them. Faithfully, Rohit Sharma , " roopak.rastogi " <roopak.rastogi wrote: > > Dear Tanvir ji, > > Could you please give some thought to the suggestions made by Shri > Rohiniranjan ji that: > > [ a ] Those who seek advice in the group should NOT address their > request to any particular astrologer. If they want to seek help from > any particular astrologer they should contact the astrologer > privately. > > [ b ] That a request can be answered by more than one astrologer and > it should NOT be construed as ‘stealing clients’. > > [ c ] The astrologers should desist from criticizing the analysis of > the other brother astrologers. > > Most of the group members already agree with the suggestions made by > shri Rohiniranjan ji. If you also agree with these suggestions, then > could you please incorporate them in the introduction of the group. > > Sincerely, > > Roopak > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Dear Bhaskar, Hope and trust that the " shubhkarya " is proceeding well, on schedule and smiles on faces all around :-) Since internet cutting and pasting and sometimes paraphrasing can lead to subtle changes and loss of context, please allow me to address one portion of your request to Tanveer which I believe originated from an earlier posting of mine to which I would like to remind everyone of the original context. I do this just for the sake of clarification and not trying to criticise or question you as to your post. Please do understand that ... , " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote: > > Dear Shri Tanvirji , > > 2)Why should one be asked to contact any > astrologer privately ? This " asking " business > has not to come through anyone including the owner. > Instead the private communication should be > the sole criterion resting on the Native alone. > Why must the owner or the Forum Moderator advise > this to members ? Is he getting some commissions > on the business coming to the astrologers by asking the > natives to contact the astrologers privately ? > No Sir, your reputation must not be tarnished. > We are not supposed to advise this. > RR: I had suggested that individuals who seek private readings or more focused readings should feel free to approach the astrologer directly via private email since that option is allowed in this forum. This will prevent the individuals from asking jyotishis by name in the header. Doing so (publicly posting message directed at one astrologer) in principle is not really different from sending a private email and awaiting a private response, would you not see it that way? As to how this matter-of-fact suggestion got translated into a petition to the Owner to incorporate poor RR's suggestions into the Forum codicil had me sit up also! Anyway, when on a journey, we just take in the sights and enjoy the conversation -- because we are tourists and do not plan to live here! Not forever for sure!! ;-) RR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 Dear Shri RRji, // As to how this matter-of-fact suggestion got translated into a petition to the Owner to incorporate poor RR's suggestions into the Forum codicil had me sit up also! // Sir, I know the mindsets of many people here, and know yours,well too.You would never make an abonoxious petition to anyone. Of course I knew that you had mentioned the subject in issue regards the e mail option available in messages where reply can be made directly to the persons personal e mail id as a mere suggestion in tyhe context of the mail where it was written. This is all manipulations, smart manevouring, and misquoted twisting done here by few, since last few weeks to achieve realisation of shady ends. Unfortunately the public who is new, will only read the latest messages, and not the old portion of the threads to understand who is smart trickster.They have been doing this continously with me, and I do not understand why Tanveerji does not make note of all this, and stop it completely. I know, and knew well, that these are not your suggestions, the way they have been presented as guidelines for the Forum. On the other mails too I would like to comment and reply, but some time later. By the way I hold you and a few others here in high esteem, so never make hasty judgements about you people, neither think in that angle. With kind blessings of you elders, the " shubhkarya " is proceeding well, and Lord Krishna is behind and near me for the accomplishment of the occasion. kind regards, Bhaskar. , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Dear Bhaskar, > > Hope and trust that the " shubhkarya " is proceeding well, on schedule > and smiles on faces all around :-) > > Since internet cutting and pasting and sometimes paraphrasing can > lead to subtle changes and loss of context, please allow me to > address one portion of your request to Tanveer which I believe > originated from an earlier posting of mine to which I would like to > remind everyone of the original context. I do this just for the sake > of clarification and not trying to criticise or question you as to > your post. Please do understand that ... > > , " Bhaskar " > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote: > > > > Dear Shri Tanvirji , > > > > 2)Why should one be asked to contact any > > astrologer privately ? This " asking " business > > has not to come through anyone including the owner. > > Instead the private communication should be > > the sole criterion resting on the Native alone. > > Why must the owner or the Forum Moderator advise > > this to members ? Is he getting some commissions > > on the business coming to the astrologers by asking the > > natives to contact the astrologers privately ? > > No Sir, your reputation must not be tarnished. > > We are not supposed to advise this. > > > > > > RR: I had suggested that individuals who seek private readings or > more focused readings should feel free to approach the astrologer > directly via private email since that option is allowed in this > forum. This will prevent the individuals from asking jyotishis by > name in the header. Doing so (publicly posting message directed at > one astrologer) in principle is not really different from sending a > private email and awaiting a private response, would you not see it > that way? > > As to how this matter-of-fact suggestion got translated into a > petition to the Owner to incorporate poor RR's suggestions into the > Forum codicil had me sit up also! > > Anyway, when on a journey, we just take in the sights and enjoy the > conversation -- because we are tourists and do not plan to live here! > Not forever for sure!! ;-) > > RR > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.