tanvirji - you may like to know who is lalit

[Guest guest]

dear tanvirji

 

this man lalit mishara spoilt the peaceful contributions in vedic

astrology group by using meanest slang words including four

letter " f**k " words against highly contributing learnt members like

pandit dakshinamoorthiji, mohanraamji and all those members who

supported pandit dakshinamoorthiji for his great knowledge sharing.

almost all members were unanimous in finding his meanest foul

language unbecoming of an educated person and demanded his ban

whereafter he was banned. then he resurfaced with another id by

copying and pasting astro lessons from other websites and then too

could not control his vulgar langauge whereafter he was again banned

from the other id also.

 

just to make the new members aware, i used to read hundreds and

thousands of charts in all astro groups earlier but reduced because

of such slander mails by lalit and others and am still contributing

by reading some unread charts and by sharing the knowledge on

scriptures only after thoroughly studying and assimilating threadbare

unlike other copy paste timepassers.

 

tanvirji, you may kindly advise lalit to refrain from personal

slander which may spoil the peace of this group as well.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

 

, " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> Dear Arjun,

>

> ... And it exposes ur black business in the name of religion ...

> after the vedic astrology group u started befooling people in this

> group also by preeching others , so, it's required to tell ur

reality

> to the innocent group members.

>

> You rudrakschha vendor, u can do ur business as a vendor only, by

> doing proper marketting no but if u do that how people will come

> under ur snare, why u people cover urself as a noble soul, as

> realized soul, as great learned soul .. guru .. pandit.. etc.

>

> You didn't learn the lessons in that group and still continued with

> ur tactis, so u r getting the lesson this way.

>

> ~Lalit.

>

>

> , " panditarjun2004 "

> <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> >

> > dear lalit

> >

> > you are the same lalit who, despite claiming a software engineer,

> > used unparliamentary slang vulgar language in vedic astrology

group

> > whereafter most members vent their anger against you and demanded

> > your immediate removal after which you were removed and then you

> > entered again with another id and then again you were demanded to

> be

> > removed and again got removed.

> >

> > in this group, there are two kinds of members. one is those who

> put

> > their queries and ask for a reading or ask a doubt on the

subject.

> > the other is those who answer these queries on the subject or

share

> > their knowledge on the subject or give a reading of the charts.

> >

> > writing unsolicited critical mails which serve no good to anyone

> only

> > expose your maturity levels.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> >

> > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > I think this arjun pandit is same pandit who sales 1 mukhi

> > > rudrakschha for rs 5 lakhs... and simultaneously advices to

> Bhaskar

> > > Ji like good people to do some charity.

> > >

> > > beware of such people... they have got 2 faces.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > >

> > > , " astroiniket "

> > > <astroiniket@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > dear bhaskarji - as stri who are pativrats are rare ; same

> > > patnivrata

> > > > purush are also rare :-)); any one who have trust, faith,

love

> > and

> > > > devotiness in relations (it includes earthy and devine both)

> will

> > > get

> > > > some extraordinary powers from nature - no doubt in that. and

> > women

> > > > are more powerfull in comp of man - i think so. we may have

> > > diffrent

> > > > opinion, but end result is one.

> > > >

> > > > rgds

> > > > niket

> > > >

> > > > , " Bhaskar "

> > > > <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Shri Panditji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Pranam,

> > > > >

> > > > > Your post was a good one. I do not mean to

> > > > > interfere in your postings, but this was again

> > > > > a negative reflection on women. I think

> > > > > as a good wellwisher, you would allow me

> > > > > to say this. You have always guided me well

> > > > > with your advises, including advise to give

> > > > > free service and readings for requests

> > > > > coming on the Forums,

> > > > > due to which I have received lots of

> > > > > accolades, gifts from God, and the

> > > > > admiration and respect of the natives who

> > > > > have been answered, and last but not the

> > > > > least, contenetment and peace at heart,

> > > > > due to this helping people.

> > > > >

> > > > > In the same manner it is my duty to reciprocate

> > > > > these well meant advises. What text has

> > > > > been quoted by you from the 'Uma Samhita'

> > > > > I have read worser artciles on women from

> > > > > venerated men of the past. But what is the

> > > > > actual purport of displaying this negativity, in

> > > > > Your mail, I quite did not understand.

> > > > > I suppose, most of us who have associated

> > > > > with women at close quarters, know about these

> > > > > qualities of the women, which

> > > > > is generalised and not categorised. I did

> > > > > not understand why we have to display these

> > > > > factors and show them in negative light.

> > > > > Instead if you had spoken of the good

> > > > > qualities of the Panch Kanyas-

> > > > > Ahalya, Draupadi, Tara, Kunti, and

> > > > > Mandodari, it would have been much better

> > > > > reading.

> > > > >

> > > > > I respect you a lot, and such negative highlighted

> > > > > mails as this one and the last one by you, on

> > > > > Janma of Shri Rama, make me wonder

> > > > > whats up.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am keeping myself away from free Horoscope

> > > > > readings, uptil March , but otherwise aware

> > > > > of all the happennings and keeping update

> > > > > because Net access has to be kept on,

> > > > > due to my other diversified business interests,

> > > > > which you are well aware of, so automatically

> > > > > I get the mails from the Forums where I have

> > > > > done Individual subscription, and then cannot

> > > > > force myself, not to read them. Hence I read

> > > > > the mails appearing on this and few other

> > > > > Forums.

> > > > >

> > > > > kind regards,

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > , " panditarjun2004 "

> > > > > <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > dear friends

> > > > > >

> > > > > > following is taken from the 29th chapter titled " women's

> > > nature "

> > > > > from

> > > > > > uma samhita in shivapurana. this particular story is

> > available

> > > > in

> > > > > > volume 3 of the english shivapurana pages 1551 to 1554

> > > published

> > > > > by

> > > > > > motilalbanarsidas.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ============quote============

> > > > > > vyasa says: o sage sanatkumara, please narrate succinctly

> > what

> > > > was

> > > > > > mentioned by pancachuda that women are despicable.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sanatkumara says: i shall explain the nature of women as

it

> > is,

> > > > > listen

> > > > > > to it, merely hearing which results in detachment. women

> are

> > > > > > lightminded. they are at the root of all troubles.

> > attachment

> > > > > towards

> > > > > > them shall not be pursued by wakeful persons who desire

> > > > > liberation. in

> > > > > > this respect they quote an ancient tradition, the

> > conversation

> > > of

> > > > > > narada with the unchaste woman pancacuda (an apsara).

> > formerly

> > > > > while

> > > > > > the intelligent celestial sage narada was wandering in

the

> > > worlds

> > > > > he

> > > > > > saw the beautiful celestial damsel pancacuda. naradas

> askes

> > > her

> > > > > to

> > > > > > narrate the nature of women for the benefit of the world.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > pancacuda (the woman apsara) says:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > this is the defect in women. even women of noble

families,

> > > women

> > > > > with

> > > > > > husbands and women endowed with beauty do not stand

within

> > the

> > > > > limits

> > > > > > of decency.

> > > > > > there is none more sinning and more sinful than women.

> > > > > > women are at the root of all sins.

> > > > > > they might have husbands of good knoweldge, of ample

> wealth,

> > of

> > > > > great

> > > > > > comeliness and pleasing to them. but when they get

> > > opportunities

> > > > > for

> > > > > > erring, they do not wait.

> > > > > > this is the evil practice of all of us women, that we

> resort

> > to

> > > > > sinful

> > > > > > men casting off all shame and shyness.

> > > > > > women love only those persons who solicit their company,

> who

> > > > > approach

> > > > > > them intimately and who render them a little bit of

service.

> > > > > > women usually do not observe the limitations of

> conventional

> > > > > decency.

> > > > > > if at all they stand by them with their husbands, it is

> > because

> > > > no

> > > > > man

> > > > > > makes advances to them or because they are afraid of

their

> > > > > husbands.

> > > > > > even women of noble families aspire for the life of

> > lascivious

> > > > > women

> > > > > > who in their prime of youth adorned with lovable

ornaments

> > and

> > > > > > beautiful wearing garments move about frivolously.

> > > > > > even the women who are honoured well, loved intimately

and

> > > looked

> > > > > after

> > > > > > with care become attached to hunchbacks, blind men,

> imbeciles

> > > and

> > > > > > dwarfs.

> > > > > > they become attached to lame and even despicable

persons.

> > > > > > there is none in the world who cannot be approached by

> women

> > > with

> > > > > > solicitations of lust.

> > > > > > if women do not get men of their dalliance they begin to

> > > indulge

> > > > > in

> > > > > > abnormal sexual activity with one another. they do not

> stnad

> > > by

> > > > > their

> > > > > > husbands.

> > > > > > women become desperate when they do not get men, when

they

> > are

> > > > > afraid

> > > > > > of servants, when they are frightened of being killed or

> > > > > imprisoned.

> > > > > > because they indulge in sexual intercourse as they please

> > they

> > > > are

> > > > > > fickleminded, of evil deeds and emotionally

> incomprehensible

> > > even

> > > > > to an

> > > > > > intelligent man.

> > > > > > fire is not satiated with the logs of wood it consumes,

the

> > > ocean

> > > > > is

> > > > > > not satiated with the rivers that flow into it. the god

of

> > > death

> > > > > is

> > > > > > not satiated with the living beings he kills and women

are

> > not

> > > > > satiated

> > > > > > with the number of men they cohabit with.

> > > > > > there is another secret of all women that immediately on

> > seeing

> > > a

> > > > > man

> > > > > > their vaginal passage begins to exude slimy secretions.

> > > > > > on seeing a man fresh and clean from his bath with his

body

> > > > > perfumed

> > > > > > with sweet scents, the vaginal passage of women begins to

> > exude

> > > > > like

> > > > > > water dripping from a leather bag.

> > > > > > women do not brook their husbands who may give all that

> they

> > > > love,

> > > > > who

> > > > > > may honour and console them and who may look after them

> well.

> > > > > > women do not remain satisfied and contented so much with

> > simple

> > > > > loves

> > > > > > and pleasures and with ornaments and money as with

illicit

> > love

> > > > > purused

> > > > > > by them with other men.

> > > > > > women can be kept equally balanced against all these put

> > > together

> > > > > viz.

> > > > > > god of death, yama, antaka, patala, the submarine fire,

the

> > > sharp

> > > > > edge

> > > > > > of razor, poison, serpent and fire.

> > > > > > ever since the five elements, the world, the men and

women

> > were

> > > > > created

> > > > > > by brahma, the defect lies in women always.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sanatkumara says: o vyasa, thus the nature of women as

> > > mentioned

> > > > > by a

> > > > > > woman pancacuda has been narrated to you. what other

cause

> > of

> > > > > > detachment do you wish to hear.

> > > > > > =============unquote=========

> > > > > >

> > > > > > the above story also appears in mahabharata where bhishma

> > > > narrates

> > > > > this

> > > > > > for the reason of detachment from women. sage narada

> > narrating

> > > > > this

> > > > > > story as a cause of detachment is also found in other

> > puranas.

> > > > > many

> > > > > > sages and saints narrate this story to their disciples

who

> > are

> > > > > > interested in liberation and detachment from women.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > members may remember a couple of mails earlier by me

where

> > > > > pativratas

> > > > > > brinda and tulasi gave curses to lord vishnu which

> highlight

> > > that

> > > > > a

> > > > > > pativrata is so rare and so powerful that even gods are

> > afraid

> > > of

> > > > > a

> > > > > > pativrata.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > > > > pandit arjun

> > > > > > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>