Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 Hi Guys Hope you all are doing well.I was going through the planetary gems association website today and found this theory on gemstones ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - So gems should be chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's planet - So gems should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM Its seems there are two school of ideas when it comes to wearing gems for remedy. The website is seem to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD. But what are your takes on this guys? Which is the correct one? Thanks Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were activated and it wasnt positive. Prayers have worked better. , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan wrote: > > Hi Guys > > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through the planetary gems > association website today and found this theory on gemstones > > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - So gems should be > chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM > > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's planet - So gems > should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM > > Its seems there are two school of ideas when it comes to wearing gems > for remedy. The website is seem to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD. > But what are your takes on this guys? Which is the correct one? > > Thanks > Hari > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! : ariamsoul: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better. , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is seem to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> _______________ Share what Santa brought you https://www.mycooluncool.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 Dear Hariji, You have struck the arrow at the bulls eye. This " akukulwad " and " pratikulawaad " is all " bakwaas " . A real astrologer should be able to find out which planets works which way for an individual Horoscope, and most of the times, the planets which we think, are benefic for any particular Lagna, turn out malefic, and the malefic turn out benefic. Very few, know the way of finding this, and the rest are only suggesting the normal format, commonly known as anukul or pratikul, which as I said does not work. Even the priiorities of the native must be known, what he wants in a particular period of Life, whether good health, wealth or Love, and Gem has to be suggested accordingly. regards, Bhaskar. www.shrikrishnajyotish.com , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan wrote: > > Hi Guys > > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through the planetary gems > association website today and found this theory on gemstones > > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - So gems should be > chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM > > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's planet - So gems > should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM > > Its seems there are two school of ideas when it comes to wearing gems > for remedy. The website is seem to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD. > But what are your takes on this guys? Which is the correct one? > > Thanks > Hari > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 Just another perspective [ from the net ] Sirs, In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious metals and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors of the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves of a particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for Mars and so on. Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a planet is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the gem will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves collected by the gem will be benefic. A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into benefic or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like a dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to his body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem for a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise to wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than improve it. A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a planet is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is positive and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for a planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good enough for a jewelry but not for astrology. Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a rare thing and extremely expensive. A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and sanctified by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified and energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. Regards, Girish Raheja , tajinder sian <tajindersinghsian wrote: > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > : ariamsoul: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- In , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is seem to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> _______________ > Share what Santa brought you > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 How many carats are recommend for gems? in any? Is it that the bigger the carats the more impact/effect? : girish_raheja: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:35:42 +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones Just another perspective [ from the net ] Sirs,In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious metals and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc.Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors of the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves of a particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for Mars and so on.Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a planet is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the gem will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves collected by the gem will be benefic. A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into benefic or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like a dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to his body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem for a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise to wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than improve it. A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a planet is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali.Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is positive and a benefic for the kundali .. A gem should not be worn for a planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali.If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good enough for a jewelry but not for astrology. Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a rare thing and extremely expensive.A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and sanctified by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge.Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified and energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit.Regards,Girish Raheja--- In , tajinder sian <tajindersinghsian wrote:>> GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE!> > > : ariamsoul: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones> > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better. , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is seem to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > ________> Share what Santa brought you> https://www.mycooluncool.com> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> _______________ Telly addicts unite! http://www.searchgamesbox.com/tvtown.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 Girish jee, Thanks for your write-up. Yes there have been many interesting and some fantastic speculations about how gemstone work (or if?)! Daivagna Ram's Muhurta Chintamani, while not a classic (as in prehistoric five thousand year old knowledge etc) is a text that does not mince words as to whether the gemstones should be worn or given in charity etc! The astrologers and proponents of the astrogemology leaning should come out of the closet and share some meaningful examples and their experience (which will mean sharing birth data and some analysis of the chart and so on). I am not a gemologist or even one who prescribes willy nilly gemstones and equivalent on internet and definitely not into tantra etc -- but would like to submit for your perusal the following: http://www.boloji.com/astro/00314.htm Remedies in Astrology is the title of the article! Rohiniranjan , " girish_raheja " <girish_raheja wrote: > > > Just another perspective [ from the net ] > > Sirs, > > > In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing > gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in > order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious metals > and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. > > Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors of > the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the > radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is > traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in > collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves of a > particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for > Mars and so on. > > Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a planet > is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the gem > will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves collected > by the gem will be benefic. > > A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into benefic > or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like a > dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. > > One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that > kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one > would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to his > body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem for > a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise to > wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than > improve it. > > A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a planet > is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. > > Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is positive > and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for a > planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. > > If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it > should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be > flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for > astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it > receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good enough > for a jewelry but not for astrology. > > Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone > should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a > rare thing and extremely expensive. > > A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and sanctified > by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to > energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. > > Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified and > energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. > > Regards, > > Girish Raheja > > > > > > , tajinder sian > <tajindersinghsian@> wrote: > > > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > > > > @: ariamsoul@: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 > +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and > one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some > time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were > activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- In > , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> > wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through > the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory > on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - > So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known > as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's > planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) > grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of > ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is seem > to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on > this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > Share what Santa brought you > > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 Excellent article written Mr Rajan. Its full of useful knowledge Thanks for sharing it with us Hari , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Girish jee, > > Thanks for your write-up. Yes there have been many interesting and > some fantastic speculations about how gemstone work (or if?)! > > Daivagna Ram's Muhurta Chintamani, while not a classic (as in > prehistoric five thousand year old knowledge etc) is a text that does > not mince words as to whether the gemstones should be worn or given > in charity etc! > > The astrologers and proponents of the astrogemology leaning should > come out of the closet and share some meaningful examples and their > experience (which will mean sharing birth data and some analysis of > the chart and so on). > > I am not a gemologist or even one who prescribes willy nilly > gemstones and equivalent on internet and definitely not into tantra > etc -- but would like to submit for your perusal the following: > > http://www.boloji.com/astro/00314.htm > > Remedies in Astrology is the title of the article! > > Rohiniranjan > > > , " girish_raheja " > <girish_raheja@> wrote: > > > > > > Just another perspective [ from the net ] > > > > Sirs, > > > > > > In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing > > gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in > > order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious metals > > and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. > > > > Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors of > > the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the > > radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is > > traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in > > collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves of > a > > particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for > > Mars and so on. > > > > Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a planet > > is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the gem > > will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves collected > > by the gem will be benefic. > > > > A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into benefic > > or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like a > > dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. > > > > One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that > > kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one > > would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to his > > body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem > for > > a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise to > > wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than > > improve it. > > > > A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a planet > > is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is positive > > and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for a > > planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. > > > > If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it > > should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be > > flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for > > astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it > > receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good enough > > for a jewelry but not for astrology. > > > > Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone > > should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a > > rare thing and extremely expensive. > > > > A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and sanctified > > by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to > > energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified > and > > energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. > > > > Regards, > > > > Girish Raheja > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , tajinder sian > > <tajindersinghsian@> wrote: > > > > > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > > > > > > > @: ariamsoul@: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 > > +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and > > one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some > > time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were > > activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- In > > , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> > > wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through > > the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory > > on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - > > So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known > > as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's > > planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) > > grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of > > ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is > seem > > to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on > > this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > > Share what Santa brought you > > > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 Respected Rohiniranjan ji, Thank you sir. Your article is just brilliant. We all know that you are such a gifted craftsman with the language. Your views on Mantra and their effectiveness are very true. Stotra or stutis are a very powerful means to appease planets. Invariably stotra and stutis end with words like " pranamamhyam " [ I bow to thee ] or " sharanamyaham " [ I come to thy shelter ]. Nothing please some one more than hearing these words and the planets are no exception. With respect and regards, Girish Raheja , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Girish jee, > > Thanks for your write-up. Yes there have been many interesting and > some fantastic speculations about how gemstone work (or if?)! > > Daivagna Ram's Muhurta Chintamani, while not a classic (as in > prehistoric five thousand year old knowledge etc) is a text that does > not mince words as to whether the gemstones should be worn or given > in charity etc! > > The astrologers and proponents of the astrogemology leaning should > come out of the closet and share some meaningful examples and their > experience (which will mean sharing birth data and some analysis of > the chart and so on). > > I am not a gemologist or even one who prescribes willy nilly > gemstones and equivalent on internet and definitely not into tantra > etc -- but would like to submit for your perusal the following: > > http://www.boloji.com/astro/00314.htm > > Remedies in Astrology is the title of the article! > > Rohiniranjan > > > , " girish_raheja " > <girish_raheja@> wrote: > > > > > > Just another perspective [ from the net ] > > > > Sirs, > > > > > > In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing > > gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in > > order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious metals > > and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. > > > > Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors of > > the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the > > radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is > > traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in > > collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves of > a > > particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for > > Mars and so on. > > > > Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a planet > > is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the gem > > will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves collected > > by the gem will be benefic. > > > > A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into benefic > > or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like a > > dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. > > > > One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that > > kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one > > would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to his > > body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem > for > > a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise to > > wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than > > improve it. > > > > A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a planet > > is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is positive > > and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for a > > planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. > > > > If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it > > should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be > > flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for > > astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it > > receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good enough > > for a jewelry but not for astrology. > > > > Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone > > should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a > > rare thing and extremely expensive. > > > > A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and sanctified > > by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to > > energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified > and > > energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. > > > > Regards, > > > > Girish Raheja > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , tajinder sian > > <tajindersinghsian@> wrote: > > > > > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > > > > > > > @: ariamsoul@: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 > > +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and > > one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some > > time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were > > activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- In > > , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> > > wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through > > the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory > > on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - > > So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known > > as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's > > planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) > > grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of > > ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is > seem > > to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on > > this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > > Share what Santa brought you > > > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 dear friends the article by RRji gives a holistic approach to remedies in general and stones in particular. while complimenting his views, let me supplement with my own observations as to how these stones are working practically based on my experience and observation besides knowledge: 1. planets give their 100 percent impact on human beings. 75 percent impact on animals and birds. 50 percent impact on trees and plants. 25 percent impact on stones. to understand this application simply put, stones receive only 25 percent of the energy from planets, plants and trees 50 percent, birds and animals 75 percent and humans 100 percent. so stones including precious stons and gems attract only 25 percent of the cosmic planetary energies. 2. stones or gems have a single point function i.e. to attract the energy of the respective planet. so it is very plain simple to understand. when you bifurcate them into anukul or pratikul, naturally it is anukul which works. 3. correlation of stones with planets find solitary scriptural sanction in garuda purana and hence members shall not state that it has no scriptural sanction. 4. stones cannot be allocated to nonexisting planets like rahu and ketu as they cant receive energies from the nonexisting planets. even considering mythological existence, rahu and ketu are demonic and rank malefics and dark planets and any stones purportedly said to receive strength from these dark planets must not be worn by any human. 5. stones for saturn are also not worn except in rarest cases where saturn is considered benefic. most saturn stone buyers first buy a stone, put it in a piece of cloth and wear for a day or two to observe its negative imapcts before buying it. 6. genuine ruby, the gem of lord sun is the most powerful among all gems and can be worn by anyone as several ancient scriptures mentioned that a genuine ruby makes the wearer a king and bring kinglike comforts. these days a genuine flawless ruby is as rare as extinct and only richest people can buy it who only enhance their already enjoying kinglike comforts. all red stones and red spinals and flawed red rubys cant give kinglike comforts to the wearers. 7. yellow saaphire in general and golden yellow sapphire in particular are considered the stones for the most natural benefic planet jupiter and hence is worn by most natives. in south india, wearing gold is considered in lieu of golden yellow sapphires. poor people who cannot afford even gold wear a haldi or even a simple yellow thread. 8. diamond is the stone for venus who is also a natural benefic and kalatrakaraka for all. hence diamond is often exchanged in the engagement rings and is now worn by men and women alike. 9. natural sea pearl is the stone for moon which has a direct impact on the mind of the native and hence considered benefic but original natural pearl is not affordable and is rarely available. 10. emerald is the stone for mercury which too is considered auspicious and is worn by kings in their crowns and also in their necklaces. even queens and rich women wear emeralds in their necklaces. 11. redcoral, stone for mars, is the most affordable of all stones and i have seen some people wearing a full mala of redcorals. but this is considered auspicious to very few people and hence an astrological guidance is requied to wear this. one can safely assume that 99 percent of the rubies, emeralds, pearls, yellow and blue sapphires sold in the market are semi precious stones or just coloured stones and are useless. most of the diamonds sold by good corporates are genuine. red corals are anyway inexpensive and genuine ones are easily affordable. one of the most famous and oldest jewellers shopchain in india has recently given an advertisement in hyderabad saying that an emearld studded necklace containing more than a dozen emeralds is sold for just four thousand rupees. from this itself, one can understand whether these emeralds are precious or not. members may understand the meaning of precious stones which itself denotes and connotes that they are precious. this is the reason why i do not recommend stones and instead recommend genuine rudraksha which are available easily and cost only a fraction of the precious stones. furthermore rudraksha are recommended by none other than lord shiva himself and find mention in various puranas, upanishads, vedas and mahabharata. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Girish jee, > > Thanks for your write-up. Yes there have been many interesting and > some fantastic speculations about how gemstone work (or if?)! > > Daivagna Ram's Muhurta Chintamani, while not a classic (as in > prehistoric five thousand year old knowledge etc) is a text that does > not mince words as to whether the gemstones should be worn or given > in charity etc! > > The astrologers and proponents of the astrogemology leaning should > come out of the closet and share some meaningful examples and their > experience (which will mean sharing birth data and some analysis of > the chart and so on). > > I am not a gemologist or even one who prescribes willy nilly > gemstones and equivalent on internet and definitely not into tantra > etc -- but would like to submit for your perusal the following: > > http://www.boloji.com/astro/00314.htm > > Remedies in Astrology is the title of the article! > > Rohiniranjan > > > , " girish_raheja " > <girish_raheja@> wrote: > > > > > > Just another perspective [ from the net ] > > > > Sirs, > > > > > > In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing > > gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in > > order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious metals > > and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. > > > > Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors of > > the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the > > radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is > > traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in > > collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves of > a > > particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for > > Mars and so on. > > > > Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a planet > > is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the gem > > will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves collected > > by the gem will be benefic. > > > > A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into benefic > > or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like a > > dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. > > > > One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that > > kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one > > would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to his > > body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem > for > > a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise to > > wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than > > improve it. > > > > A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a planet > > is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is positive > > and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for a > > planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. > > > > If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it > > should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be > > flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for > > astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it > > receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good enough > > for a jewelry but not for astrology. > > > > Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone > > should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a > > rare thing and extremely expensive. > > > > A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and sanctified > > by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to > > energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified > and > > energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. > > > > Regards, > > > > Girish Raheja > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , tajinder sian > > <tajindersinghsian@> wrote: > > > > > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > > > > > > > @: ariamsoul@: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 > > +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and > > one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some > > time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were > > activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- In > > , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> > > wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going through > > the planetary gems> association website today and found this theory > > on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's planet - > > So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known > > as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's > > planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) > > grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of > > ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is > seem > > to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on > > this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > > Share what Santa brought you > > > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 Respected Pandit Arjun ji, A very valuable article indeed, worth preserving for future reference. If the gems, being stones,receive only 25% of the planetary energy then what could be a better alternative to receive more energy from the planets? Respectfully, Girish Raheja , " panditarjun2004 " <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > the article by RRji gives a holistic approach to remedies in general > and stones in particular. while complimenting his views, let me > supplement with my own observations as to how these stones are > working practically based on my experience and observation besides > knowledge: > > 1. planets give their 100 percent impact on human beings. 75 percent > impact on animals and birds. 50 percent impact on trees and plants. > 25 percent impact on stones. to understand this application simply > put, stones receive only 25 percent of the energy from planets, > plants and trees 50 percent, birds and animals 75 percent and humans > 100 percent. so stones including precious stons and gems attract > only 25 percent of the cosmic planetary energies. > > 2. stones or gems have a single point function i.e. to attract the > energy of the respective planet. so it is very plain simple to > understand. when you bifurcate them into anukul or pratikul, > naturally it is anukul which works. > > 3. correlation of stones with planets find solitary scriptural > sanction in garuda purana and hence members shall not state that it > has no scriptural sanction. > > 4. stones cannot be allocated to nonexisting planets like rahu and > ketu as they cant receive energies from the nonexisting planets. > even considering mythological existence, rahu and ketu are demonic > and rank malefics and dark planets and any stones purportedly said to > receive strength from these dark planets must not be worn by any > human. > > 5. stones for saturn are also not worn except in rarest cases where > saturn is considered benefic. most saturn stone buyers first buy a > stone, put it in a piece of cloth and wear for a day or two to > observe its negative imapcts before buying it. > > 6. genuine ruby, the gem of lord sun is the most powerful among all > gems and can be worn by anyone as several ancient scriptures > mentioned that a genuine ruby makes the wearer a king and bring > kinglike comforts. these days a genuine flawless ruby is as rare as > extinct and only richest people can buy it who only enhance their > already enjoying kinglike comforts. all red stones and red spinals > and flawed red rubys cant give kinglike comforts to the wearers. > > 7. yellow saaphire in general and golden yellow sapphire in > particular are considered the stones for the most natural benefic > planet jupiter and hence is worn by most natives. in south india, > wearing gold is considered in lieu of golden yellow sapphires. poor > people who cannot afford even gold wear a haldi or even a simple > yellow thread. > > 8. diamond is the stone for venus who is also a natural benefic and > kalatrakaraka for all. hence diamond is often exchanged in the > engagement rings and is now worn by men and women alike. > > 9. natural sea pearl is the stone for moon which has a direct impact > on the mind of the native and hence considered benefic but original > natural pearl is not affordable and is rarely available. > > 10. emerald is the stone for mercury which too is considered > auspicious and is worn by kings in their crowns and also in their > necklaces. even queens and rich women wear emeralds in their > necklaces. > > 11. redcoral, stone for mars, is the most affordable of all stones > and i have seen some people wearing a full mala of redcorals. but > this is considered auspicious to very few people and hence an > astrological guidance is requied to wear this. > > one can safely assume that 99 percent of the rubies, emeralds, > pearls, yellow and blue sapphires sold in the market are semi > precious stones or just coloured stones and are useless. most of the > diamonds sold by good corporates are genuine. red corals are anyway > inexpensive and genuine ones are easily affordable. > > one of the most famous and oldest jewellers shopchain in india has > recently given an advertisement in hyderabad saying that an emearld > studded necklace containing more than a dozen emeralds is sold for > just four thousand rupees. from this itself, one can understand > whether these emeralds are precious or not. > > members may understand the meaning of precious stones which itself > denotes and connotes that they are precious. this is the reason why > i do not recommend stones and instead recommend genuine rudraksha > which are available easily and cost only a fraction of the precious > stones. furthermore rudraksha are recommended by none other than > lord shiva himself and find mention in various puranas, upanishads, > vedas and mahabharata. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > , " Rohiniranjan " > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > Girish jee, > > > > Thanks for your write-up. Yes there have been many interesting and > > some fantastic speculations about how gemstone work (or if?)! > > > > Daivagna Ram's Muhurta Chintamani, while not a classic (as in > > prehistoric five thousand year old knowledge etc) is a text that > does > > not mince words as to whether the gemstones should be worn or given > > in charity etc! > > > > The astrologers and proponents of the astrogemology leaning should > > come out of the closet and share some meaningful examples and their > > experience (which will mean sharing birth data and some analysis of > > the chart and so on). > > > > I am not a gemologist or even one who prescribes willy nilly > > gemstones and equivalent on internet and definitely not into tantra > > etc -- but would like to submit for your perusal the following: > > > > http://www.boloji.com/astro/00314.htm > > > > Remedies in Astrology is the title of the article! > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , " girish_raheja " > > <girish_raheja@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just another perspective [ from the net ] > > > > > > Sirs, > > > > > > > > > In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of wearing > > > gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned in > > > order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious > metals > > > and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. > > > > > > Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as receptors > of > > > the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect the > > > radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is > > > traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient in > > > collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these waves > of > > a > > > particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral for > > > Mars and so on. > > > > > > Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a > planet > > > is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by the > gem > > > will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves > collected > > > by the gem will be benefic. > > > > > > A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into > benefic > > > or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just like > a > > > dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. > > > > > > One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that > > > kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No one > > > would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred to > his > > > body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a gem > > for > > > a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would advise > to > > > wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather than > > > improve it. > > > > > > A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a > planet > > > is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. > > > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is > positive > > > and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for a > > > planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. > > > > > > If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, it > > > should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be > > > flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for > > > astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it > > > receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good > enough > > > for a jewelry but not for astrology. > > > > > > Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem alone > > > should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem is a > > > rare thing and extremely expensive. > > > > > > A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and > sanctified > > > by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how to > > > energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. > > > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been sanctified > > and > > > energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Girish Raheja > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , tajinder sian > > > <tajindersinghsian@> wrote: > > > > > > > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > > > > > > > > > > @: ariamsoul@: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 > > > +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets and > > > one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some > > > time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas were > > > activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- In > > > , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> > > > wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going > through > > > the planetary gems> association website today and found this > theory > > > on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's > planet - > > > So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA > known > > > as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's > > > planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) > > > grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school of > > > ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website is > > seem > > > to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes on > > > this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > > > Share what Santa brought you > > > > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 dear girishji the answer lies in the previous mail itself. we humans receive hundred percent energy from the planets but natives dream for heat in winter and cold in summer and hence natives always strive to go against the planets and try to do all sorts of remedies. for a realised person who opens his arms wide in welcoming the planets and take whatever they give gracefully, he is the most blissful person in the world. but for all those who do not accept what they get, they do various remedies, some working for them and some not so useful. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com , " girish_raheja " <girish_raheja wrote: > > Respected Pandit Arjun ji, > > A very valuable article indeed, worth preserving for future > reference. > > If the gems, being stones,receive only 25% of the planetary energy > then what could be a better alternative to receive more energy from > the planets? > > Respectfully, > > Girish Raheja > > > , " panditarjun2004 " > <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > the article by RRji gives a holistic approach to remedies in > general > > and stones in particular. while complimenting his views, let me > > supplement with my own observations as to how these stones are > > working practically based on my experience and observation besides > > knowledge: > > > > 1. planets give their 100 percent impact on human beings. 75 > percent > > impact on animals and birds. 50 percent impact on trees and > plants. > > 25 percent impact on stones. to understand this application > simply > > put, stones receive only 25 percent of the energy from planets, > > plants and trees 50 percent, birds and animals 75 percent and > humans > > 100 percent. so stones including precious stons and gems attract > > only 25 percent of the cosmic planetary energies. > > > > 2. stones or gems have a single point function i.e. to attract the > > energy of the respective planet. so it is very plain simple to > > understand. when you bifurcate them into anukul or pratikul, > > naturally it is anukul which works. > > > > 3. correlation of stones with planets find solitary scriptural > > sanction in garuda purana and hence members shall not state that > it > > has no scriptural sanction. > > > > 4. stones cannot be allocated to nonexisting planets like rahu and > > ketu as they cant receive energies from the nonexisting planets. > > even considering mythological existence, rahu and ketu are demonic > > and rank malefics and dark planets and any stones purportedly said > to > > receive strength from these dark planets must not be worn by any > > human. > > > > 5. stones for saturn are also not worn except in rarest cases > where > > saturn is considered benefic. most saturn stone buyers first buy > a > > stone, put it in a piece of cloth and wear for a day or two to > > observe its negative imapcts before buying it. > > > > 6. genuine ruby, the gem of lord sun is the most powerful among > all > > gems and can be worn by anyone as several ancient scriptures > > mentioned that a genuine ruby makes the wearer a king and bring > > kinglike comforts. these days a genuine flawless ruby is as rare > as > > extinct and only richest people can buy it who only enhance their > > already enjoying kinglike comforts. all red stones and red > spinals > > and flawed red rubys cant give kinglike comforts to the wearers. > > > > 7. yellow saaphire in general and golden yellow sapphire in > > particular are considered the stones for the most natural benefic > > planet jupiter and hence is worn by most natives. in south india, > > wearing gold is considered in lieu of golden yellow sapphires. > poor > > people who cannot afford even gold wear a haldi or even a simple > > yellow thread. > > > > 8. diamond is the stone for venus who is also a natural benefic > and > > kalatrakaraka for all. hence diamond is often exchanged in the > > engagement rings and is now worn by men and women alike. > > > > 9. natural sea pearl is the stone for moon which has a direct > impact > > on the mind of the native and hence considered benefic but > original > > natural pearl is not affordable and is rarely available. > > > > 10. emerald is the stone for mercury which too is considered > > auspicious and is worn by kings in their crowns and also in their > > necklaces. even queens and rich women wear emeralds in their > > necklaces. > > > > 11. redcoral, stone for mars, is the most affordable of all stones > > and i have seen some people wearing a full mala of redcorals. but > > this is considered auspicious to very few people and hence an > > astrological guidance is requied to wear this. > > > > one can safely assume that 99 percent of the rubies, emeralds, > > pearls, yellow and blue sapphires sold in the market are semi > > precious stones or just coloured stones and are useless. most of > the > > diamonds sold by good corporates are genuine. red corals are > anyway > > inexpensive and genuine ones are easily affordable. > > > > one of the most famous and oldest jewellers shopchain in india has > > recently given an advertisement in hyderabad saying that an > emearld > > studded necklace containing more than a dozen emeralds is sold for > > just four thousand rupees. from this itself, one can understand > > whether these emeralds are precious or not. > > > > members may understand the meaning of precious stones which itself > > denotes and connotes that they are precious. this is the reason > why > > i do not recommend stones and instead recommend genuine rudraksha > > which are available easily and cost only a fraction of the > precious > > stones. furthermore rudraksha are recommended by none other than > > lord shiva himself and find mention in various puranas, > upanishads, > > vedas and mahabharata. > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > pandit arjun > > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > Girish jee, > > > > > > Thanks for your write-up. Yes there have been many interesting > and > > > some fantastic speculations about how gemstone work (or if?)! > > > > > > Daivagna Ram's Muhurta Chintamani, while not a classic (as in > > > prehistoric five thousand year old knowledge etc) is a text that > > does > > > not mince words as to whether the gemstones should be worn or > given > > > in charity etc! > > > > > > The astrologers and proponents of the astrogemology leaning > should > > > come out of the closet and share some meaningful examples and > their > > > experience (which will mean sharing birth data and some analysis > of > > > the chart and so on). > > > > > > I am not a gemologist or even one who prescribes willy nilly > > > gemstones and equivalent on internet and definitely not into > tantra > > > etc -- but would like to submit for your perusal the following: > > > > > > http://www.boloji.com/astro/00314.htm > > > > > > Remedies in Astrology is the title of the article! > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > , " girish_raheja " > > > <girish_raheja@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Just another perspective [ from the net ] > > > > > > > > Sirs, > > > > > > > > > > > > In the classic works of astrology there is no mention of > wearing > > > > gems as a remedy. At places donating gems has been mentioned > in > > > > order to propitiate planets, so have been mentioned precious > > metals > > > > and every day objects like haldi, mustard oil, til etc. > > > > > > > > Gems have been considered, like many other objects, as > receptors > > of > > > > the planetary radiation. It is believed that the gems collect > the > > > > radiating waves of a planet and transfer it to the body. It is > > > > traditionally believed that a particular gem is more efficient > in > > > > collecting, absorbing and transferring to the body, these > waves > > of > > > a > > > > particular planet, like yellow sapphire for Jupiter or coral > for > > > > Mars and so on. > > > > > > > > Therefore gems behave like the planets they represent. If a > > planet > > > > is malefic in the kundali, the radiating waves collected by > the > > gem > > > > will be malefic; and if the planet is a benefic the waves > > collected > > > > by the gem will be benefic. > > > > > > > > A gem doesn't have the power to convert malefic waves into > > benefic > > > > or vice-versa. Remember it is just a passive receptor, just > like > > a > > > > dish antenna collecting Radio/TV signals. > > > > > > > > One should wear a gem of a planet that is a benefic for that > > > > kundali. One should not wear a gem for a malefic planet. No > one > > > > would want a gem to collect malefic waves and be transferred > to > > his > > > > body. Unfortunately most of the astrologers advise wearing a > gem > > > for > > > > a malefic. If they find Saturn acting malefic they would > advise > > to > > > > wear blue sapphire; now that would make things worse rather > than > > > > improve it. > > > > > > > > A learned astrologer can advise after ascertaining whether a > > planet > > > > is acting benefic or malefic in the kundali. > > > > > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only for a planet which is > > positive > > > > and a benefic for the kundali . A gem should not be worn for > a > > > > planet which is hostile and a malefic for the kundali. > > > > > > > > If a gem acts like an antenna dish collecting radiating waves, > it > > > > should be very finely tuned, or in other words it should be > > > > flawless. Therefore only a flawless gem is worth using for > > > > astrological purposes. A flawed gem will distort the waves it > > > > receives which might cause harm. A flawed gem might be good > > enough > > > > for a jewelry but not for astrology. > > > > > > > > Therefore an absolutely flawless " amal { mal rahit } " gem > alone > > > > should be worn, what ever the price. Remember a flawless gem > is a > > > > rare thing and extremely expensive. > > > > > > > > A gem is just a piece of stone till it is energized and > > sanctified > > > > by a qualified mantra shatra pundit. Not every one knows how > to > > > > energize and sanctify a gem. It is a rare knowledge. > > > > > > > > Therefore a gem should be worn only after it has been > sanctified > > > and > > > > energized by a competent mantra shastra pundit. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Girish Raheja > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , tajinder sian > > > > <tajindersinghsian@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > GOODISM GOODISM GOODISM....PLEASE! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @: ariamsoul@: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:10:21 > > > > +0000 Re: Theory on gemstones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My husband was prescribed gems for his 2maran karak planets > and > > > > one H12 planet. ( Pratikul Vad???) He wore it for quite some > > > > time.The effects were only felt when the dashas/sub dashas > were > > > > activated and it wasnt positive.Prayers have worked better.--- > In > > > > , " harinomore " <Hari_Dharan@> > > > > wrote:>> Hi Guys> > Hope you all are doing well.I was going > > through > > > > the planetary gems> association website today and found this > > theory > > > > on gemstones> > ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act " SAME " as it's > > planet - > > > > So gems should be> chosen for Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA > > known > > > > as GOODISM> > PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act " OPPOSITE " of it's > > > > planet - So gems> should be chosen for Pratikul (unfavorable) > > > > grahas - AKA known as BADISM> > Its seems there are two school > of > > > > ideas when it comes to wearing gems> for remedy. The website > is > > > seem > > > > to be more supportive of ANUKULA VAD.> But what are your takes > on > > > > this guys? Which is the correct one?> > Thanks> Hari> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > > > > Share what Santa brought you > > > > > https://www.mycooluncool.com > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.