Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 Dear Members I have rejected 3 messages today ridiculing astrology and astrologers felt it is not worth circulating it and expending our time on it every subject has its own merits, demerits its own scale to be judged upon good and bad practitioners and here members r both highly experienced and also learning members writing. members are doing their bit and can be right or wrong here if one is wrong can be corrected by suggestive messages than criticism for fun sake or deriding the subject there was one message that went to say we r here just to solicit clientele than help them, after they post so many queries for free reading in so many groups they have such audacity to write so, many of the members here highly learned, well placed in life and do it for the LOVE OF THE SUBJECT and help the needy, distressed in their hour of pain no group can claim its membership can give its astrologers sustaiable income, they need to have their own avenues. astrology is a guide not a fix it or cure for all problems we can tell them till what time they have to endure it or when things can change or possible options they r coming their way both good and bad things life is a very vast canvas we can cover a small portion of it no one here is claiming to be god as they charge us we r all human interpreting the Divine's script in a limited way that too that is of concern to the one who is seriously challenged at the time of posting, not the jobless, know it all lot I would like to know should I continue to do this rejections or allow some to come in we need criticism to grow as it is our best book to evaluate ourselves our failures are our best books, but ones i rejected were too personal and abusing the subject too by those who abused it till they found it convenient to use it. Best wishes Prashant kumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 prashant ji - we should welcome any healthy mail, any mail which give bad smel, should not allowed. critic if healthy and having solution will be best, otherwise we have nature to critic any one without reeason. we should take care. rgds niket , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Dear Members > > I have rejected 3 messages today ridiculing astrology and astrologers felt it is not worth circulating it and expending our time on it > > every subject has > > its own merits, demerits > > its own scale to be judged upon > > good and bad practitioners > > and here members r both highly experienced and also learning members writing. > > > members are doing their bit and can be right or wrong here if one is wrong can be corrected by suggestive messages than criticism for fun sake or deriding the subject > > there was one message that went to say we r here just to solicit clientele than help them, after they post so many queries for free reading in so many groups they have such audacity to write so, many of the members here highly learned, well placed in life and do it for the LOVE OF THE SUBJECT and help the needy, distressed in their hour of pain > > no group can claim its membership can give its astrologers sustaiable income, they need to have their own avenues. > > astrology is a guide not a fix it or cure for all problems > > we can tell them till what time they have to endure it > or when things can change > or possible options they r coming their way both good and bad things > > life is a very vast canvas we can cover a small portion of it no one here is claiming to be god as they charge us we r all human interpreting the Divine's script in a limited way that too that is of concern to the one who is seriously challenged at the time of posting, not the jobless, know it all lot > > > I would like to know should I continue to do this rejections or allow some to come in > > we need criticism to grow as it is our best book to evaluate ourselves our failures are our best books, but ones i rejected were too personal and abusing the subject too by those who abused it till they found it convenient to use it. > > > Best wishes > > Prashant kumar > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Kumar ji, Good job! These unsubstantiated kinds of 'brayings' are products of frustrated and vacuuous minds who neither have studied astrology nor astrologers and just wish to paint everything and everyone with a broad brush. In fact it is a boon that they could not become astrologers! God indeed is looking after Janta Janaardhan! ;-) RR , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar wrote: > > Dear Members > > I have rejected 3 messages today ridiculing astrology and astrologers felt it is not worth circulating it and expending our time on it > > every subject has > > its own merits, demerits > > its own scale to be judged upon > > good and bad practitioners > > and here members r both highly experienced and also learning members writing. > > > members are doing their bit and can be right or wrong here if one is wrong can be corrected by suggestive messages than criticism for fun sake or deriding the subject > > there was one message that went to say we r here just to solicit clientele than help them, after they post so many queries for free reading in so many groups they have such audacity to write so, many of the members here highly learned, well placed in life and do it for the LOVE OF THE SUBJECT and help the needy, distressed in their hour of pain > > no group can claim its membership can give its astrologers sustaiable income, they need to have their own avenues. > > astrology is a guide not a fix it or cure for all problems > > we can tell them till what time they have to endure it > or when things can change > or possible options they r coming their way both good and bad things > > life is a very vast canvas we can cover a small portion of it no one here is claiming to be god as they charge us we r all human interpreting the Divine's script in a limited way that too that is of concern to the one who is seriously challenged at the time of posting, not the jobless, know it all lot > > > I would like to know should I continue to do this rejections or allow some to come in > > we need criticism to grow as it is our best book to evaluate ourselves our failures are our best books, but ones i rejected were too personal and abusing the subject too by those who abused it till they found it convenient to use it. > > > Best wishes > > Prashant kumar > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Dear RRJi yes it is true they are not made to be any good professionals either, where dedication, patience and understanding the nuances of any subject is involved. they r good in doing donkeys job most times either copying someones efforts or just doing a replicate jobs or worse entering data in a s/w. and of course as now most of them do get fat pay check feel they have conquered all. I am happy to see u, nikit appreciate the move, as it is a wasted energy by such elements who have used the system and yet poke fun at us past the post. in fact 2 mails were derogatory one Nikit along side they abused the subject itself not worth passing to the group. I told them that Nikit has taken some effort, right or wrong if wrong and u know the right way guides us all we r oepn to learn from anyone. critism for the heck of it is not allowed. Best wishes Prashant kumar Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:47:13 AM Re: negative mails 23/7 Kumar ji, Good job! These unsubstantiated kinds of 'brayings' are products of frustrated and vacuuous minds who neither have studied astrology nor astrologers and just wish to paint everything and everyone with a broad brush. In fact it is a boon that they could not become astrologers! God indeed is looking after Janta Janaardhan! ;-) RR , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Members > > I have rejected 3 messages today ridiculing astrology and astrologers felt it is not worth circulating it and expending our time on it > > every subject has > > its own merits, demerits > > its own scale to be judged upon > > good and bad practitioners > > and here members r both highly experienced and also learning members writing. > > > members are doing their bit and can be right or wrong here if one is wrong can be corrected by suggestive messages than criticism for fun sake or deriding the subject > > there was one message that went to say we r here just to solicit clientele than help them, after they post so many queries for free reading in so many groups they have such audacity to write so, many of the members here highly learned, well placed in life and do it for the LOVE OF THE SUBJECT and help the needy, distressed in their hour of pain > > no group can claim its membership can give its astrologers sustaiable income, they need to have their own avenues. > > astrology is a guide not a fix it or cure for all problems > > we can tell them till what time they have to endure it > or when things can change > or possible options they r coming their way both good and bad things > > life is a very vast canvas we can cover a small portion of it no one here is claiming to be god as they charge us we r all human interpreting the Divine's script in a limited way that too that is of concern to the one who is seriously challenged at the time of posting, not the jobless, know it all lot > > > I would like to know should I continue to do this rejections or allow some to come in > > we need criticism to grow as it is our best book to evaluate ourselves our failures are our best books, but ones i rejected were too personal and abusing the subject too by those who abused it till they found it convenient to use it. > > > Best wishes > > Prashant kumar > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.