Sunil ji - 13 Sep 1963; 8:35 pm; Delhi [28n40, 77e13]

[Guest guest]

Please delete this message 14568

 

Thanks

Sunil

[Guest guest]

Dear SKG

 

thanks for asking this request else we would NOT HAVE KNOWN OF SUCH A GOOD

WORKING A V GOOD MODEL TO FOLLOW in analysis for any astrologer as many new

members r here learning the subject a v good piece

 

what is ur feedback on this pl let us know

 

we understand sympathise with ur situation prevailing in those days hope it

turned out better by now

 

as regards deletion it pl see group policies on it

 

subject once posted here in PUBLIC CAN'T BE DELETED REQUESTES R DECLINE

 

prashant

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

skgskg2k <skgskg2k

 

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:42:38 PM

Re: Sunil ji - 13 Sep 1963; 8:35 pm; Delhi [28n40, 77e13]

 

 

Please delete this message 14568

 

Thanks

Sunil

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Kumar ji,

 

Given that the readings and comments were about Sunil K. Guptaji, and

he is requesting that those be deleted -- my humble request is that

his wish should be respected.

 

Unlike a " public message " a public reading perhaps should be seen a

bit differently. Even, and more so perhaps, if the nativity posted

and got a response earlier out of good faith of a brilliant

astrologer and writer like Balaji, if the reading makes the nativity

uncomfortable my request to you is to deal with sensitivity and

reconsider.

 

It is like someone sharing their diary in a moment when they did not

care who read it, but if later on such an action was to cause

anguish, embarrasment or pain to the nativity they should get a

break. Now if Sunil Gupta ji were a public figure, that would be a

different matter, but as a private person as I presume he is, the

rules should be more lax and compassionate.

 

Of course the final decision is up to you and Tanvir if the two

messages should remain on the board or be deleted. The interesting

aside is that the two messages would probably not have been read by

anyone unless publicly pointed out by Guptaji. He should have written

to your privately obviously!

 

Ah Internet!! What was I saying in another thread... ;-)

 

 

RR

 

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar wrote:

>

> Dear SKG

>

> thanks for asking this request else we would NOT HAVE KNOWN OF SUCH

A GOOD WORKING A V GOOD MODEL TO FOLLOW in analysis for any

astrologer as many new members r here learning the subject a v good

piece

>

> what is ur feedback on this pl let us know

>

> we understand sympathise with ur situation prevailing in those days

hope it turned out better by now

>

> as regards deletion it pl see group policies on it

>

> subject once posted here in PUBLIC CAN'T BE DELETED REQUESTES R

DECLINE

>

> prashant

>

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> skgskg2k <skgskg2k

>

> Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:42:38 PM

> Re: Sunil ji - 13 Sep 1963; 8:35 pm; Delhi [28n40,

77e13]

>

>

> Please delete this message 14568

>

> Thanks

> Sunil

 

[Guest guest]

Dear RRji

 

 

I am only a custodian of the group and moderate it, I DONT OWN it and the

policies as laid by the Owner are adhered to if as u said he had requested me in

private I could have taken it to Tanvir ji and seen

 

BUT THE LOSS IS MORE OF JYOTISH IT IS A V SCHOLARLY WORK DONE AND A WORTHYONE I

ADMIRE THE TIME, EFFORT PUT IN AND EVEN MORE THE SENSITIVE NATURE OF A PERSON'S

LIFE IS SO CRAFTLY DONE USING MORE OF JYOTISH THAN ANY SUGAR COATED STUFF

 

 

I also asked him for a feedback on it

 

my only concern was if he has still been in a bad shape he may be up to

something his owrld may not have a clue but if he ha progressed and is well now,

it is good

so the feedback is imp for JYOTISH SAKE. in public or private

 

prashant

 

 

________________________________

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

 

Thursday, January 29, 2009 7:15:02 AM

Re: Sunil ji - 13 Sep 1963; 8:35 pm; Delhi [28n40, 77e13]

 

 

Dear Kumar ji,

 

Given that the readings and comments were about Sunil K. Guptaji, and

he is requesting that those be deleted -- my humble request is that

his wish should be respected.

 

Unlike a " public message " a public reading perhaps should be seen a

bit differently. Even, and more so perhaps, if the nativity posted

and got a response earlier out of good faith of a brilliant

astrologer and writer like Balaji, if the reading makes the nativity

uncomfortable my request to you is to deal with sensitivity and

reconsider.

 

It is like someone sharing their diary in a moment when they did not

care who read it, but if later on such an action was to cause

anguish, embarrasment or pain to the nativity they should get a

break. Now if Sunil Gupta ji were a public figure, that would be a

different matter, but as a private person as I presume he is, the

rules should be more lax and compassionate.

 

Of course the final decision is up to you and Tanvir if the two

messages should remain on the board or be deleted. The interesting

aside is that the two messages would probably not have been read by

anyone unless publicly pointed out by Guptaji. He should have written

to your privately obviously!

 

Ah Internet!! What was I saying in another thread... ;-)

 

RR

 

, Prashant Kumar G B

<gbp_kumar@. ..> wrote:

>

> Dear SKG

>

> thanks for asking this request else we would NOT HAVE KNOWN OF SUCH

A GOOD WORKING A V GOOD MODEL TO FOLLOW in analysis for any

astrologer as many new members r here learning the subject a v good

piece

>

> what is ur feedback on this pl let us know

>

> we understand sympathise with ur situation prevailing in those days

hope it turned out better by now

>

> as regards deletion it pl see group policies on it

>

> subject once posted here in PUBLIC CAN'T BE DELETED REQUESTES R

DECLINE

>

> prashant

>

>

>

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> skgskg2k <skgskg2k@.. .>

>

> Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:42:38 PM

> Re: Sunil ji - 13 Sep 1963; 8:35 pm; Delhi [28n40,

77e13]

>

>

> Please delete this message 14568

>

> Thanks

> Sunil