Guest guest Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Dear AV pathi ji please take the message of RRji in the right spirit in this I find this part to be his key words than the words surrounding it /// please INCLUDE enough astrological details /// and similarly in ur reply // I have traveled around world practicing Astrology and I am in many panels // rest can be ignored for the benefit of Jyotish knowledge sharing and if u really run away only because of him u may know he is also in many forums, so it is better for the subject if both of u use ur experience, wisdom for all of our benefit by mutual discussions or exchanges and give less importance to what can be distracting u. the love for the subject is common so the platform/s available must be used effectively with all its challenges. I have also bein the subject since dec 77 and studied under a guru from 86-06 and have been with him for min 6 months a yr due to aging parents their health challanges I am constrained to be here and he too is old [my guru with international presence hailing from the Mysore Maharaja asthana jyotishis] I too found RRji's mails hard to deal with for the 1st 7 MONTHS AND AT TIMES later ALSO BUT THIS doesnt MATTER MUCH AS ONCE WE DEVLOP a understanding of one another we can see on what we can agree/converge and work within them, this slowly can be enlarged as yrs roll on matters we disagree, wich can only shrink peace will help all of us I hope u will consider my msg in the right spirit as well. thanks prashant ________________________________ venkatachala pathi <pathiav Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:26:59 PM Re: Dear MR. Venkatachala Pathi and your postings! Dear Mr. Rohini Rajan: I have been watching your mails, which indicate that you are ultimate boss and you are sure to comment on anything and everything. I am least interested to give my articles to your 'possessed' forum. While I send informative articles to many forums, I thought these would enlighten 'only those who would like to know' on the 'subject' to expand there interest. I am not running an educational institution through your 'dominated' forum. I started learning astrology under a famous guru in 1957 and I have traveled around world practicing Astrology and I am in many panels, which I need not enlist to your goodself, an imminent great astrologer in you. With this I stop contributing to your group in any manner. I will watch your shadow in any group, and I will sincerely avoid it. Blessings. A.V.Pathi, ____________ _________ _________ __ Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:51:15 AM Dear MR. Venkatachala Pathi and your postings! I have been seeing some of these *postings* which appear as if from some forum where you were Questioned and Answered and now you wish to enlighten us here on Jyotish_remedies forum! I am assuming that these postings that you kindly share with all of us " great unwashed " are about astrology and if so -- please INCLUDE enough astrological details so that those of us who have the time to take your postings SERIOUSLY can respond astrologically! Otherwise -- you are just wasting our TIME! Rohiniranjan , venkatachala pathi <pathiav > wrote: > > Q:: In my horoscope made in three different places in as many softwares, in Chennai. In each one of them there are different ‘Ayanamsa’ in which the charts are calculated. I notice the placements of Planets in the same Data given also in different places in the NatalChart Why? (Sath....3/2/ 2009) >  > I may have to answer this at length. >  > Our early calculations, before 1200 AD or about that time, were all made in Siddhantic Calendar and our time was under Vedic Principles of the movement of the Moon and rising of the Sun. >  > This was extensively brought to practice by Aryabatta (AD 476 †" 523) and Parasara (fifth century AD). This could be found in ‘Hora Sastra’ the first major astrological treatise. But the most revered astrologer was Varahamihra (AD 505 †" 587), a student of Parasara and transmitter of the knowledge that Parasara was notable to convey to public. The Siddhantic calendar, minus the implementation of the precession of the equinoxes, continued to be used as India’s official calendar until A.D.1200. That is the time Indiafell into Muslim rule, from 1200 to 1757 A.D., when Lunar Hijira calendar was introduced. >  > Hindu communities through out Indiamanaged to continue to maintain independence and retained their calendars for religious purposes. This eventually left to the task of calendar making in the hands of regional astrologers, who had little knowledge of actual astronomy. Even now the astronomical calendars (Panjang) continue to be in the hands of those in the field in Kancheepuram, Arani, Tinnevelly, Palghat, Mangalore and Tanjore schools of compiling. They depended on direct observations and unscientific ancient treatises for their calculations ( ref: the Calender Reform Committee. P.2) >  > The variety of Ayanamsas can be attributed to the fact that astrologers disagree about starting point of Aries, the exact annual rate of progression, and the year in which the vernal equinox actually coincided with 0° Aries. >  > Shree Lahari, the secretary of Calendar Reform committee, is the compiler of India’s official ephemeris, and his Ayanamsa is close to correct arrival of calculations. Krishnamurthy’s Ayanamsa is also close to Lahari’s, as he calculated 50.27 seconds, being the rate of progression, and the year of two coinciding Zodiacs as A.D.285. It is relevant to account that, Mr Cyril Fagon, who campaigned to the use of Sidereal Zodiac in Western schoolof Astrology, determined the starting year as 221. >  > To give an example, say for the year 1997, the most commonly used Ayanamsa’s are as follows: > Fagon-Bradley  24°42’ > Lahari                23°49’ > Krishnamurthi   23°43 > B.V.Raman       22°22’ >  > The discrepancy of more than two degrees between the Ayanamsas of Raman and Fagan can make a very marked difference, especially with the planets that change signs according to different Ayanamsas. >  > This also could make an astrologer give different interpretations, leading to wrong inference, often, while the credibility of the scholarship of Astrologer, could be at stake. >  > I personal preference is Lahari’s Ayanamsas, which I consider as almost correct for correct interpretations. >  > (Please Note: Some of facts and figures as well as comments were assimilated from various authors, including those of Ms. R.G.Dreyer(an American), a practicing Astrologer in New York, who had spent considerable time in Varanasi as student of Dr. Muralilal Sharma, Prof. of Jyotish in Sanskrit University, and Pandit Deoki Nandan Shastri. She lectures extensively in Hindu Vedic Astrology groups including United Astrology Group in Canada, Germany, Holland, U.K.and U.S.A.) >  > Pathi. (20/3/2009) > My new address from 5/April/2009 > A.V.Pathi, > care Dr. Sreenivasan, > " Oxton " House, > 6Hawthorn Road, LN3 4JT > Lincoln, UK > Phone::0044+ 01522+595996 >  > >  >  > A.V.Pathi,  > 103, Black Tie Lane, Chapel Hill,                                    > North Carolina, 27514, USA > 001-919-960- 3833 > Please contact me in ID kountinya29@ ...)All private readings are chargeable.Disclaim er > A.V.Pathi and his Astrology Team want to make it absolutely clear that no discipline is absolutely perfect. Hence, any prediction that you receive from us is not to be considered as a substitute for advice, program, or treatment that you would normally receive from a licensed professional such as a lawyer, doctor, psychiatrist, or financial advisor. A.V. Pathi will not recommend remedies. A.V.Pathi provides no guarantees, implied warranties, or assurances of any kind, and will not be responsible for any interpretation made or use by the recipient of the information and data mentioned above. By the Grace of God he can only try to give his best and hope that his efforts will improve the life of his customers. ~~A.V.Pathi, Astrologer. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Dear Mr. Prashanth ji, I care less, how great Mr. Rohini Rajan is. I care less how proficient in astrology, he is. He has no business to comment on every line every person writes with a tone of authority. No body, had mastered this great science. No one is born to comment on any one who sincerely attempts with what best he can to make at large, everyone to get interest to know this science which is older than any religion practiced in this world. Who is he to write to me? Let him be big to you or to any one.  I am big myself, in circle where I am admired. He has no business to come to forum and advise me on my article. As Moderator you delete my article. I care less for that also. This 'one up' attitude is intollerable in a public forum, however, great scholarly or super human, he be in this subject. Let me say thank you once for all.  A.V.Pathi,   ________________________________ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Saturday, March 21, 2009 10:16:56 AM Re: Dear MR. Venkatachala Pathi and your postings! 21/3 Dear AV pathi ji please take the message of RRji in the right spirit in this I find this part to be his key words than the words surrounding it /// please INCLUDE enough astrological details /// and similarly in ur reply // I have traveled around world practicing Astrology and I am in many panels // rest can be ignored for the benefit of Jyotish knowledge sharing and if u really run away only because of him u may know he is also in many forums, so it is better for the subject if both of u use ur experience, wisdom for all of our benefit by mutual discussions or exchanges and give less importance to what can be distracting u. the love for the subject is common so the platform/s available must be used effectively with all its challenges. I have also bein the subject since dec 77 and studied under a guru from 86-06 and have been with him for min 6 months a yr due to aging parents their health challanges I am constrained to be here and he too is old [my guru with international presence hailing from the Mysore Maharaja asthana jyotishis] I too found RRji's mails hard to deal with for the 1st 7 MONTHS AND AT TIMES later ALSO BUT THIS doesnt MATTER MUCH AS ONCE WE DEVLOP a understanding of one another we can see on what we can agree/converge and work within them, this slowly can be enlarged as yrs roll on matters we disagree, wich can only shrink peace will help all of us I hope u will consider my msg in the right spirit as well. thanks prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ venkatachala pathi <pathiav > Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:26:59 PM Re: Dear MR. Venkatachala Pathi and your postings! Dear Mr. Rohini Rajan: I have been watching your mails, which indicate that you are ultimate boss and you are sure to comment on anything and everything. I am least interested to give my articles to your 'possessed' forum. While I send informative articles to many forums, I thought these would enlighten 'only those who would like to know' on the 'subject' to expand there interest. I am not running an educational institution through your 'dominated' forum. I started learning astrology under a famous guru in 1957 and I have traveled around world practicing Astrology and I am in many panels, which I need not enlist to your goodself, an imminent great astrologer in you. With this I stop contributing to your group in any manner. I will watch your shadow in any group, and I will sincerely avoid it. Blessings. A.V.Pathi, ____________ _________ _________ __ Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ hotmail.com> Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:51:15 AM Dear MR. Venkatachala Pathi and your postings! I have been seeing some of these *postings* which appear as if from some forum where you were Questioned and Answered and now you wish to enlighten us here on Jyotish_remedies forum! I am assuming that these postings that you kindly share with all of us " great unwashed " are about astrology and if so -- please INCLUDE enough astrological details so that those of us who have the time to take your postings SERIOUSLY can respond astrologically! Otherwise -- you are just wasting our TIME! Rohiniranjan , venkatachala pathi <pathiav > wrote: > > Q:: In my horoscope made in three different places in as many softwares, in Chennai. In each one of them there are different ‘Ayanamsa’ in which the charts are calculated. I notice the placements of Planets in the same Data given also in different places in the NatalChart Why? (Sath....3/2/ 2009) >  > I may have to answer this at length. >  > Our early calculations, before 1200 AD or about that time, were all made in Siddhantic Calendar and our time was under Vedic Principles of the movement of the Moon and rising of the Sun. >  > This was extensively brought to practice by Aryabatta (AD 476 †" 523) and Parasara (fifth century AD). This could be found in ‘Hora Sastra’ the first major astrological treatise. But the most revered astrologer was Varahamihra (AD 505 †" 587), a student of Parasara and transmitter of the knowledge that Parasara was notable to convey to public. The Siddhantic calendar, minus the implementation of the precession of the equinoxes, continued to be used as India’s official calendar until A.D.1200. That is the time Indiafell into Muslim rule, from 1200 to 1757 A.D., when Lunar Hijira calendar was introduced. >  > Hindu communities through out Indiamanaged to continue to maintain independence and retained their calendars for religious purposes. This eventually left to the task of calendar making in the hands of regional astrologers, who had little knowledge of actual astronomy. Even now the astronomical calendars (Panjang) continue to be in the hands of those in the field in Kancheepuram, Arani, Tinnevelly, Palghat, Mangalore and Tanjore schools of compiling. They depended on direct observations and unscientific ancient treatises for their calculations ( ref: the Calender Reform Committee. P.2) >  > The variety of Ayanamsas can be attributed to the fact that astrologers disagree about starting point of Aries, the exact annual rate of progression, and the year in which the vernal equinox actually coincided with 0° Aries. >  > Shree Lahari, the secretary of Calendar Reform committee, is the compiler of India’s official ephemeris, and his Ayanamsa is close to correct arrival of calculations. Krishnamurthy’s Ayanamsa is also close to Lahari’s, as he calculated 50.27 seconds, being the rate of progression, and the year of two coinciding Zodiacs as A.D.285. It is relevant to account that, Mr Cyril Fagon, who campaigned to the use of Sidereal Zodiac in Western schoolof Astrology, determined the starting year as 221. >  > To give an example, say for the year 1997, the most commonly used Ayanamsa’s are as follows: > Fagon-Bradley  24°42’ > Lahari                23°49’ > Krishnamurthi   23°43 > B.V.Raman       22°22’ >  > The discrepancy of more than two degrees between the Ayanamsas of Raman and Fagan can make a very marked difference, especially with the planets that change signs according to different Ayanamsas. >  > This also could make an astrologer give different interpretations, leading to wrong inference, often, while the credibility of the scholarship of Astrologer, could be at stake. >  > I personal preference is Lahari’s Ayanamsas, which I consider as almost correct for correct interpretations. >  > (Please Note: Some of facts and figures as well as comments were assimilated from various authors, including those of Ms. R.G.Dreyer(an American), a practicing Astrologer in New York, who had spent considerable time in Varanasi as student of Dr. Muralilal Sharma, Prof. of Jyotish in Sanskrit University, and Pandit Deoki Nandan Shastri. She lectures extensively in Hindu Vedic Astrology groups including United Astrology Group in Canada, Germany, Holland, U.K.and U.S.A.) >  > Pathi. (20/3/2009) > My new address from 5/April/2009 > A.V.Pathi, > care Dr. Sreenivasan, > " Oxton " House, > 6Hawthorn Road, LN3 4JT > Lincoln, UK > Phone::0044+ 01522+595996 >  > >  >  > A.V.Pathi,  > 103, Black Tie Lane, Chapel Hill,                                    > North Carolina, 27514, USA > 001-919-960- 3833 > Please contact me in ID kountinya29@ ...)All private readings are chargeable.Disclaim er > A.V.Pathi and his Astrology Team want to make it absolutely clear that no discipline is absolutely perfect. Hence, any prediction that you receive from us is not to be considered as a substitute for advice, program, or treatment that you would normally receive from a licensed professional such as a lawyer, doctor, psychiatrist, or financial advisor. A.V. Pathi will not recommend remedies. A.V.Pathi provides no guarantees, implied warranties, or assurances of any kind, and will not be responsible for any interpretation made or use by the recipient of the information and data mentioned above. By the Grace of God he can only try to give his best and hope that his efforts will improve the life of his customers. ~~A.V.Pathi, Astrologer. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.