YOGAS- certain misconceptions and Astrologer's EGO

March 24, 2009

Dear All,

Based on my past interactions, in my humble opinion these are thoughts I

have.

The core idea is to improve upon astrology as an art and sceince.

This writing has no bearing on Sri tripathi Ji's original asnwer on YOGAS .

I have been saying a great dela of complicated analysis...in the past- which in

my humble opinion deviates us from the FUNDAMENTALS.....as a result the

INTERPRETETION though fluffy and attarctive with lots of jargon in it is

incorrect..( I have doen this mistake myslef , we all do it under stress or

proving..)

1) YOGAS as we know are simple combinations of planetary energy..they are

categorized in various forms..but in BPHS..I could see a good deal of emphasis

oon SOLAR and LUNAR Yogas..

YES, in such situations may be the strength of sun or moon might be the key...

2) but the counter point is why not ascendant( be it moon or sun0? As in any

dasha the dahsa lord's relationhisps with ascendant...makes the difference..

3) Why is SUN or MOON taken as reference- the premise in my humble opinion is

HIGH ENERGY POINTS= SUN and MOON

4) Counter point: But ascendant is also taken as a high energy point? Corerct.

Also in jaimini...the planet which has traversed max. degress is taken as a

reference?

Why?

May be the energy aquired by it is maximum in the sign?

So if HIGH ENERGY POINT is the basiss- then we have many...

We as astrologers need to be open and stay away from which I call " astrologer's

ego " which keeps us away from reality .

We can see the data or energy interpretetion could have many factes to the same(

any astrologer can guess the sudarshan padditi is an outcome of the same..)

Due to all above reasons I had asked the question to dear Tripathi Ji.

.....I though discussing it would clear many doubts fro all of us- with a healthy

discussion...

Sun is the soul of ...is a standard refrence we all know

Thanks..

Good Luck.

regards,

Punkajj

Recommended Posts