YES...That is CORRECT Intution-Vs- Systmatic Study

[Guest guest]

Dear Tripathy Ji,

YES, that si what is said in the post I made.

 

I agree with you.

 

The TOOL to be sharpened is ASTOLOGY, and the the bsis of sharpening is

expereince and rigor(more logic, less of emotionalism or jumpiness).

 

Also making FOCUSSED predictions based on only one system ata time:

 

a) Parashara

b) Jaimini

 

OR within a systems(say Parashara) based on transits/dahsa....in the long run

helps to build the logic/rigor we are trying to acheive some goal.

 

But intution does get develoepd without our knowing..as we use mroe and mroe

logic.Though yes it may not be perfect..

 

So there is no dichotomy in what we are talking about

 

Thanks for all your inputs..

 

REgards,

Punkajj

 

, " Mrutyunjay Tripathy "

<astrologer_mrutyunjay wrote:

>

> Dear friend,

>

> To make study (both teaching and learning )of astrology useful we should avoid

intution at all cost at all levels.

>

> As ordinary human faculty is unable to differentiate between the signals

originating from pure-intelligence (jupiter) and emotions (mind).

>

> Note that steadiness of emotion is one of the precondition for becoming a good

Jyotish.

>

> IT IS SAFER WE AVOID EMOTIONS IN EVERY STATES OF OUR USAGE OF JYOTISH...EITHER

LEARNING OR COUNSELLING OR DOING RESEEARCH.

>

> With regards and best wishes,

>

>

> Mrutyunjay Tripathy

>

> , " Pom " <pankajdhar@> wrote:

> >

> > I agree Prashant Ji. Intuition is the key.

> >

> >

> > But till it is perfect, in my humble opinion- suing a tool as a midway is

one of the solutions.As we all do..else we not have been studying astrology...

> >

> > Although as per some references pure LOGIC is also intuitive..so more

rigrously one works with a framework- the more intuitive one may become- as

atleast the subconscious gets trained that way.

> >

> > As per some experts( I dont have the reference for the same) intution is an

outcome of a) Sub concious b) super conscious proces...to make it un erring the

latter needs to de devloepd more..

> >

> > But may be till one reaches that level- one could hold to a)..sharpening the

tool....and one way out is focus on only one system at a time..then try to see

the redictions..

> >

> > Yes it is a tool. But in my opinion to build up more discipline- one may try

to give predictions based on:

> >

> > a) Dasha only

> > b) transits

> > c) Vedic numbers.

> >

> > The idea is to build focus on one system.... I think this helps to build up

confidence..

> >

> > Anyways - it is just an input....that convergence...should be there.. or

could be there... taht is all..

> >

> > Regards,

> > Punkajj.

> >

> > , Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Pankaj

> > >

> > > not sure why u wanted this msg to be here, did any1 say so?

> > >

> > > knowledge can't be stolen, max shared and Jyotishya is no one can claim

mastery in it as Intution, karma balance sheet of the querist, astrologer and

Almighty's grace need to be in sync to make it happen ou r knowledge is just a

tool the script is well above us- Astrologers r just interpreters of divine

script. they cant write the script to feel superior or stealable.

> > >

> > > it is another thing that we can impart our methodology, approach knowledge

to ones interested in purusing this subject but this works on the said 3

principles finally else why will so many padatthis, SA, khichid stuff come iand

work still as INTUTION is the key

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Prashant

> > >

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > > Pom <pankajdhar@>

> > >

> > > Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:20:01 PM

> > > MIS-CONCEPTIONS an " Astrologer " should not

entertain..-Predictive Convergence?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear all,

> > > Some of the " astrologers " entertain a misconception- that some one will

copy their method of prediction or their prediction.

> > >

> > > This only some one will do who lacks confidence in himself.A competent one

would not do the same

> > >

> > > Working and verifying various systems indepndently- be it chinese astro,

> > > numbers, vedic astro (Gochar based or dasha), if a basic level of mastery

is there- PREDICTIONS GENERALLY CONVERGE, with some varying degrees of

details..( they change from one mdoel to other, but generally they CONVERGE...)

> > >

> > > Yes, failures are there- which we agreed are there due to inherent

prediction methods in astrology.

> > >

> > > Thanks.

> > > Punkajj

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >