Guest guest Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Dear Rohiniji, I had a limited interest when I wrote that. Such type of forecasts like India would be no one in the world or world population would stabalise at 6227 million give a 'feel good' feeling. Offcource, Mr Jha has given a big complex study and due to lack of application on my part,impatience, shortage of time etc I could not go through that. Some expert say that extreme weather conditions like floods/droughts etc due to severe chnges in the rainfall pattern and glacial melting etc , would be occuring. But stastically these are not proved. That way ,as we know that positions of planets are well known in advance[these planets have fix movement and can be seen in ephemeris quite in advace, so no change in their positioning as per movement, therefore the rainy days ect. are all fixed, so why worry. Offcorce we have to consider things like very slow moving planets, overall orientaion of solar system in the univers etc.] So I wanted to be happy and I mentioned so in that context. Inder , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Inderji, > > Sadly, it seems that this 'number' may already have been overshot and is now being scaled back to the 'optimum' (dont ask me for the source!) through war, genocide, tsunamis and locusts etc... > > Kaliyuga in full swing! > > RR > > , " Inder " <indervohra2001@> wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > > Inder > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@> wrote: > > > > > > RR JI, > > > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@> > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > > Re: World Population...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > > preciousness > > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.