Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Vinay ji well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom the lines that befit it will be different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. animals may be becoing humans.... but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? and N Indian cities Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. best wishe prashant ________________________________ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Prashant ji, You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. -VJ ============ === ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Vinay ji, a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation Prashant ji, You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. -Vinay Jha ============ ======== ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear Inder, tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... and in what form will nature cut its nos to size the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear friends, This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. Inder , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > RR JI, > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > -VJ > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > RR > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs, > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > preciousness > > nature such great human efforts. > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > vrkrishnan > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > World Population.. .? > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > -VJ > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Prashant Ji, You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. -vj ________________________________ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Vinay ji well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom the lines that befit it will be different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. animals may be becoing humans.... but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? and N Indian cities Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. best wishe prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Prashant ji, You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. -VJ ============ === ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Vinay ji, a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation Prashant ji, You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. -Vinay Jha ============ ======== ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear Inder, tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... and in what form will nature cut its nos to size the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear friends, This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. Inder , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > RR JI, > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > -VJ > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > RR > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs, > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > preciousness > > nature such great human efforts. > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > vrkrishnan > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > World Population.. .? > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > -VJ > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Why to RR ji? Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! RR , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > Prashant Ji, > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > -vj > > > ________________________________ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > Vinay ji > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > the lines that befit it will be > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > animals may be becoing humans.... > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > and N Indian cities > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > best wishe > > prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > Prashant ji, > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > -VJ > ============ === ======= > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > Vinay ji, > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > Prashant ji, > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > -Vinay Jha > ============ ======== ======= > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > Re: World Population.. .? > > Dear Inder, > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > Re: World Population.. .? > > Dear friends, > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > Inder > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > RR JI, > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > -VJ > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > RR > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > preciousness > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > vrkrishnan > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 RR Ji, OK, I will not send this population file to you. You have said yourself that these forums are not for serious discussions, and when I feel them I am charged of paranoia ! On these forums, I find persons like SKB " dada " who hate to read original Sanskrit texts even in translations and charge me of inventing wrong interpretations of ancient texts. They will deliberately distort population data out of all proportions and waste my time over useless controversies in wrong directions. You and Krishnan Ji are reducing these things to magic. Hence, I do not feel any need to discuss population on these fora. Some prople judge before they read the full thing. It occupies one full chapter in my forthcoming book on Suryasiddhanta, which has grown out of all proportions and I am struggling to keep it to size. -VJ ============== ===== ________________________________ Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:18:26 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Why to RR ji? Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! RR , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > Prashant Ji, > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > -vj > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@. ..> > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > Vinay ji > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > the lines that befit it will be > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > animals may be becoing humans.... > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > and N Indian cities > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > best wishe > > prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > Prashant ji, > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > -VJ > ============ === ======= > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > Vinay ji, > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > Prashant ji, > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > -Vinay Jha > ============ ======== ======= > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > Re: World Population.. .? > > Dear Inder, > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > Prashant > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > Re: World Population.. .? > > Dear friends, > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > Inder > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > RR JI, > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > -VJ > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > RR > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > preciousness > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > vrkrishnan > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Vinay ji I was expecting only ur last line nothing else // we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. // to get any realistic picture may be the no of 10 cycles u said can be squeezed in 1 or two cycles also may be project based on the 14, 15th elements and also the depleting natural resources at a v alarming rate and if we start to use sea water as fuel u can expect much more faster devolution provess with oceans also drying up and salt deposits piling up several landscapes that heat up the environment even faster to make it like Kuja like HOT atmosphere and fry out all living spicies in no time. but NOT 10 CYCLES surely prashant ________________________________ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:12:34 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Prashant Ji, You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. -vj ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Vinay ji well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom the lines that befit it will be different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. animals may be becoing humans.... but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? and N Indian cities Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. best wishe prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Prashant ji, You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. -VJ ============ === ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Vinay ji, a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation Prashant ji, You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. -Vinay Jha ============ ======== ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear Inder, tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... and in what form will nature cut its nos to size the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear friends, This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. Inder , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > RR JI, > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > -VJ > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > RR > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs, > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > preciousness > > nature such great human efforts. > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > vrkrishnan > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > World Population.. .? > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > -VJ > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Dear Vinay Ji, What I said in a private message to you when you expressed your discomfort about my 'non-astrological' postings was simply that I do not think Internet is a place for any serious discussion, astrological or otherwise :-) Have I said anything differently on any forum, otherwise? The non-seriousness and insincerity arises not from the forum, fora or Internet itself but those who choose to participate and contribute and interact! It is not the computer that we log-in from but that spark of divinity that types on it that can make the difference :-) I am almost feeling embarassed that I have to point such a simple fact and reminder to someone as uplifted as you, Vinay Ji! If an ordinary farmer like me with no accomplishments or presence can connect so amicably with you, and Sunil da and many others who you may feel are your enemies and can keep on answering and asking and make you all do the same reciprocally, surely something must be amiss? Or maybe nothing is! Or ever was ...? , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > RR Ji, > OK, I will not send this population file to you. You have said yourself that these forums are not for serious discussions, and when I feel them I am charged of paranoia ! On these forums, I find persons like SKB " dada " who hate to read original Sanskrit texts even in translations and charge me of inventing wrong interpretations of ancient texts. They will deliberately distort population data out of all proportions and waste my time over useless controversies in wrong directions. You and Krishnan Ji are reducing these things to magic. Hence, I do not feel any need to discuss population on these fora. Some prople judge before they read the full thing. It occupies one full chapter in my forthcoming book on Suryasiddhanta, which has grown out of all proportions and I am struggling to keep it to size. > -VJ > > ============== ===== > > > ________________________________ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:18:26 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > Why to RR ji? > > Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! > > Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! > > RR > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > Prashant Ji, > > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > > > -vj > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay ji > > > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > > > the lines that befit it will be > > > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > > animals may be becoing humans.... > > > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > > and N Indian cities > > > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > > > best wishe > > > > prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > > > -VJ > > ============ === ======= > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > Vinay ji, > > > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > > > prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > > > -Vinay Jha > > ============ ======== ======= > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > Dear Inder, > > > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > > > Prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > Dear friends, > > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > > Inder > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > RR JI, > > > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > > preciousness > > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 RR Ji, <<<< " How will you ... or anyone count the population and really figure out what the true headcount is in the world at a given moment? ... impossibility of such a quest! " >>>> Not impossible. Statistical analysis of all available data helps demographers to plug in the loopholes as well as in trimming overestimates. My population article contained statistical ayalysis of all long term past data plus estimates. But you refused to see it. I will not send it to those who are not interested in what they regard as nonsense even before seeing the article. <<<reincarnation>>>> It has nothing to do with population counts. Horoscope of next or previous birth is not the same, similarly arrangement of 13 elements is also not same. <<< " 6227 worldwide has already been surpassed " >>> No Sir ! You are talking of estimates, let the data come. " Experts " say world population will stabilize at 15-20 billions. Censuses are held once a decade. These censuses amay contain some irregularities, but 6 billion will not become 8 billion in actual census. There are many methods of counter checks at the disposal of demographers. <<<< Perhaps the day human beings crossed that number of 6227020800 Kaliyuga commenced! >>>> 6227 is not 'optimum'. It is a 'maximum' which will never be even touched, leave aside surpassing. otherwise, Saamkhya will need 14th and 15th elements, and the DATA presented in my population article you refused to see are false ! <<<< " I do not believe at all that anyone is doomed: Doomsdayers or Doom-sayers! " >>>> Yes, Vedic religion has no scope for permanently Doomed states for souls. God is compassionate even for sinners and gives them innumerable chances to improve through innumerable rebirths. <<<< " Beta don't waste your time in all this 'crap' of magic, study and learn good things. " Only in these moments of stress which brings out the humanness that is within all of us and which indeed makes us human are the glimpses of reality! >>>> Take my words positively : You are putting Saamkhya in a wrong context. The opposite is true. In moments of real trouble, under border-line-situations of existentialists, humans are able to transcend " the social being " imposed by society through formal and informal education and are able to comprehend glimpses of transcendal reality which is otherwise occult and seems to be magic or hoax. It requires either Bolts from the Blue or extraordinary tapasyaa to " brings out the humanness that is within all of us and which indeed makes us human are the glimpses of reality! " , otherwise it is impossible to perceive anything beyond Lacanian " signifying chain " . Concrete answers to your questions and misgivings are there in population article, which you refused to receive through email. Astrological forums are not proper places for such articles. -VJ ==================================================================== ________________________________ Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:50:52 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Dear Vinay Ji, What I said in a private message to you when you expressed your discomfort about my 'non-astrological' postings was simply that I do not think Internet is a place for any serious discussion, astrological or otherwise :-) Have I said anything differently on any forum, otherwise? The non-seriousness and insincerity arises not from the forum, fora or Internet itself but those who choose to participate and contribute and interact! It is not the computer that we log-in from but that spark of divinity that types on it that can make the difference :-) I am almost feeling embarassed that I have to point such a simple fact and reminder to someone as uplifted as you, Vinay Ji! If an ordinary farmer like me with no accomplishments or presence can connect so amicably with you, and Sunil da and many others who you may feel are your enemies and can keep on answering and asking and make you all do the same reciprocally, surely something must be amiss? Or maybe nothing is! Or ever was ...? , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > RR Ji, > OK, I will not send this population file to you. You have said yourself that these forums are not for serious discussions, and when I feel them I am charged of paranoia ! On these forums, I find persons like SKB " dada " who hate to read original Sanskrit texts even in translations and charge me of inventing wrong interpretations of ancient texts. They will deliberately distort population data out of all proportions and waste my time over useless controversies in wrong directions. You and Krishnan Ji are reducing these things to magic. Hence, I do not feel any need to discuss population on these fora. Some prople judge before they read the full thing. It occupies one full chapter in my forthcoming book on Suryasiddhanta, which has grown out of all proportions and I am struggling to keep it to size. > -VJ > > ============ == ===== > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:18:26 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > Why to RR ji? > > Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! > > Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! > > RR > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > Prashant Ji, > > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > > > -vj > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay ji > > > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > > > the lines that befit it will be > > > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > > animals may be becoing humans.... > > > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > > and N Indian cities > > > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > > > best wishe > > > > prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > > > -VJ > > ============ === ======= > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > Vinay ji, > > > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > > > prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > > > -Vinay Jha > > ============ ======== ======= > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > Dear Inder, > > > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > > > Prashant > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > Dear friends, > > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > > Inder > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > RR JI, > > > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > > > RR > > > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > > preciousness > > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Prashant ji, I could not understand what you mean by saying " NOT 10 CYCLES surely " . Why surely ? How can we say Hindu time cycles of 432000 years of Kaliyuga is wrong, before we see some proof of its falsity ? Secondly, 14th element will need a mximum population of 14! which is over 87 billions. No demographer thinks Earth can sustain so many humans. Hence, 13! is the ultimate limit. For factual evidence, you will need to study mt article on population which I do not want to upload on an astrological forum, although it is related to prediction of population, because some persons do not like such discussions and feel disturbed by such " nonsense " in otherwise sanctified fora. -VJ ====================== ==== ________________________________ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:46:22 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Vinay ji I was expecting only ur last line nothing else // we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. // to get any realistic picture may be the no of 10 cycles u said can be squeezed in 1 or two cycles also may be project based on the 14, 15th elements and also the depleting natural resources at a v alarming rate and if we start to use sea water as fuel u can expect much more faster devolution provess with oceans also drying up and salt deposits piling up several landscapes that heat up the environment even faster to make it like Kuja like HOT atmosphere and fry out all living spicies in no time. but NOT 10 CYCLES surely prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:12:34 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Prashant Ji, You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. -vj ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Vinay ji well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom the lines that befit it will be different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. animals may be becoing humans.... but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? and N Indian cities Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. best wishe prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Prashant ji, You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. -VJ ============ === ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 Vinay ji, a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation Prashant ji, You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. -Vinay Jha ============ ======== ======= ____________ _________ _________ __ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear Inder, tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... and in what form will nature cut its nos to size the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. Prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM Re: World Population.. .? Dear friends, This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. Inder , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > RR JI, > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > -VJ > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > RR > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..> wrote: > > > > Dear Sirs, > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > preciousness > > nature such great human efforts. > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > vrkrishnan > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > World Population.. .? > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > -VJ > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Dear Vinay ji, Not being a mathematician or statistician, I will probably not understand anything in your article hence I declined. It would not be civil of me to have you go through the trouble of sending your article which I can feel is very precious to you. I realize that these are estimates because even data keep changing as people get born and die many over even a minute! But the US census site I quoted earlier also use statistical manipulation of estimates and have described at their web site. Even if your estimates may arguably better than anybody's in the world they will still remain estimates. That is all I was saying. I think this is another of those tangents in which we better not get tangled :-) RR , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > RR Ji, > > <<<< " How will you ... or anyone count the population and really figure out what the true headcount is in the world at a given moment? ... impossibility of such a quest! " >>>> > > Not impossible. Statistical analysis of all available data helps demographers to plug in the loopholes as well as in trimming overestimates. My population article contained statistical ayalysis of all long term past data plus estimates. But you refused to see it. I will not send it to those who are not interested in what they regard as nonsense even before seeing the article. > > <<<reincarnation>>>> It has nothing to do with population counts. Horoscope of next or previous birth is not the same, similarly arrangement of 13 elements is also not same. > > <<< " 6227 worldwide has already been surpassed " >>> > No Sir ! You are talking of estimates, let the data come. " Experts " say world population will stabilize at 15-20 billions. Censuses are held once a decade. These censuses amay contain some irregularities, but 6 billion will not become 8 billion in actual census. There are many methods of counter checks at the disposal of demographers. > > <<<< Perhaps the day human beings crossed that number of 6227020800 Kaliyuga commenced! >>>> 6227 is not 'optimum'. It is a 'maximum' which will never be even touched, leave aside surpassing. otherwise, Saamkhya will need 14th and 15th elements, and the DATA presented in my population article you refused to see are false ! > > <<<< " I do not believe at all that anyone is doomed: Doomsdayers or Doom-sayers! " >>>> > Yes, Vedic religion has no scope for permanently Doomed states for souls. God is compassionate even for sinners and gives them innumerable chances to improve through innumerable rebirths. > > <<<< " Beta don't waste your time in all this 'crap' of magic, study and learn good things. " Only in these moments of stress which brings out the humanness that is within all of us and which indeed makes us human are the glimpses of reality! >>>> > > Take my words positively : You are putting Saamkhya in a wrong context. The opposite is true. In moments of real trouble, under border-line-situations of existentialists, humans are able to transcend " the social being " imposed by society through formal and informal education and are able to comprehend glimpses of transcendal reality which is otherwise occult and seems to be magic or hoax. It requires either Bolts from the Blue or extraordinary tapasyaa to " brings out the humanness that is within all of us and which indeed makes us human are the glimpses of reality! " , otherwise it is impossible to perceive anything beyond Lacanian " signifying chain " . > > Concrete answers to your questions and misgivings are there in population article, which you refused to receive through email. Astrological forums are not proper places for such articles. > > -VJ > ==================================================================== > > > > > ________________________________ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:50:52 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > Dear Vinay Ji, > > What I said in a private message to you when you expressed your discomfort about my 'non-astrological' postings was simply that I do not think Internet is a place for any serious discussion, astrological or otherwise :-) > > Have I said anything differently on any forum, otherwise? > > The non-seriousness and insincerity arises not from the forum, fora or Internet itself but those who choose to participate and contribute and interact! > > It is not the computer that we log-in from but that spark of divinity that types on it that can make the difference :-) > > I am almost feeling embarassed that I have to point such a simple fact and reminder to someone as uplifted as you, Vinay Ji! > > If an ordinary farmer like me with no accomplishments or presence can connect so amicably with you, and Sunil da and many others who you may feel are your enemies and can keep on answering and asking and make you all do the same reciprocally, surely something must be amiss? Or maybe nothing is! > > Or ever was ...? > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > RR Ji, > > OK, I will not send this population file to you. You have said yourself that these forums are not for serious discussions, and when I feel them I am charged of paranoia ! On these forums, I find persons like SKB " dada " who hate to read original Sanskrit texts even in translations and charge me of inventing wrong interpretations of ancient texts. They will deliberately distort population data out of all proportions and waste my time over useless controversies in wrong directions. You and Krishnan Ji are reducing these things to magic. Hence, I do not feel any need to discuss population on these fora. Some prople judge before they read the full thing. It occupies one full chapter in my forthcoming book on Suryasiddhanta, which has grown out of all proportions and I am struggling to keep it to size. > > -VJ > > > > ============ == ===== > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:18:26 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > Why to RR ji? > > > > Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! > > > > Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Prashant Ji, > > > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > > > > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > > > > > -vj > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay ji > > > > > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > > > > > the lines that befit it will be > > > > > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > > > > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > > > animals may be becoing humans.... > > > > > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > > > > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > > > > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > > > > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > > > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > > > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > > > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > > > and N Indian cities > > > > > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > > > > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > > > > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > > > > > best wishe > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > > > > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > > > > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ === ======= > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > > > Vinay ji, > > > > > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > > > > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > > > > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > > > > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > > > > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > > > > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > > > > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > > > > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > > > > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > > > > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > > > > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > > > > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > > > > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > > > > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > > > > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > > > > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > > > > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > > > > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > > > > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > > > > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > > > > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > > > > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > > > > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > > > > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > > > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > > > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > > > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > > > > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > ============ ======== ======= > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Inder, > > > > > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > > > > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > > > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > > > > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > > > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > > > > > Prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > > > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > > > Inder > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > RR JI, > > > > > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > > > preciousness > > > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Vinay ji... with reference to our recent interaction (below): vedic astrology/message/113195 Case in point or something like that they say! RR , " Rohiniranjan " <rohini_ranjan wrote: > > Dear Vinay Ji, > > What I said in a private message to you when you expressed your discomfort about my 'non-astrological' postings was simply that I do not think Internet is a place for any serious discussion, astrological or otherwise :-) > > Have I said anything differently on any forum, otherwise? > > The non-seriousness and insincerity arises not from the forum, fora or Internet itself but those who choose to participate and contribute and interact! > > It is not the computer that we log-in from but that spark of divinity that types on it that can make the difference :-) > > I am almost feeling embarassed that I have to point such a simple fact and reminder to someone as uplifted as you, Vinay Ji! > > If an ordinary farmer like me with no accomplishments or presence can connect so amicably with you, and Sunil da and many others who you may feel are your enemies and can keep on answering and asking and make you all do the same reciprocally, surely something must be amiss? Or maybe nothing is! > > Or ever was ...? , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@> wrote: > > > > RR Ji, > > OK, I will not send this population file to you. You have said yourself that these forums are not for serious discussions, and when I feel them I am charged of paranoia ! On these forums, I find persons like SKB " dada " who hate to read original Sanskrit texts even in translations and charge me of inventing wrong interpretations of ancient texts. They will deliberately distort population data out of all proportions and waste my time over useless controversies in wrong directions. You and Krishnan Ji are reducing these things to magic. Hence, I do not feel any need to discuss population on these fora. Some prople judge before they read the full thing. It occupies one full chapter in my forthcoming book on Suryasiddhanta, which has grown out of all proportions and I am struggling to keep it to size. > > -VJ > > > > ============== ===== > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@> > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:18:26 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > Why to RR ji? > > > > Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! > > > > Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Prashant Ji, > > > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > > > > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > > > > > -vj > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay ji > > > > > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > > > > > the lines that befit it will be > > > > > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > > > > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > > > animals may be becoing humans.... > > > > > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > > > > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > > > > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > > > > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > > > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > > > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > > > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > > > and N Indian cities > > > > > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > > > > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > > > > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > > > > > best wishe > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > > > > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > > > > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ === ======= > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > > > Vinay ji, > > > > > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > > > > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > > > > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > > > > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > > > > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > > > > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > > > > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > > > > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > > > > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > > > > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > > > > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > > > > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > > > > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > > > > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > > > > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > > > > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > > > > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > > > > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > > > > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > > > > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > > > > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > > > > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > > > > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > > > > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > > > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > > > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > > > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > > > > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > ============ ======== ======= > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Inder, > > > > > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > > > > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > > > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > > > > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > > > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > > > > > Prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > > > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > > > Inder > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > RR JI, > > > > > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > > > preciousness > > > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 RR Ji, My population article is written for the average reader who is far less intelligent than you. I did not want to discuss it in astrological fora because there are a handful of persons who will say I am diverting astrological discussions to non-astrological topics, although population forecasting is not unrelated to astrology. I have got 3 - 4 good readers, hence I am now simplifying my population article further with a view to upload it in JR file section. -VJ ================ === ________________________________ Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:58:25 AM Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... Dear Vinay ji, Not being a mathematician or statistician, I will probably not understand anything in your article hence I declined. It would not be civil of me to have you go through the trouble of sending your article which I can feel is very precious to you. I realize that these are estimates because even data keep changing as people get born and die many over even a minute! But the US census site I quoted earlier also use statistical manipulation of estimates and have described at their web site. Even if your estimates may arguably better than anybody's in the world they will still remain estimates. That is all I was saying. I think this is another of those tangents in which we better not get tangled :-) RR , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > RR Ji, > > <<<< " How will you ... or anyone count the population and really figure out what the true headcount is in the world at a given moment? ... impossibility of such a quest! " >>>> > > Not impossible. Statistical analysis of all available data helps demographers to plug in the loopholes as well as in trimming overestimates. My population article contained statistical ayalysis of all long term past data plus estimates. But you refused to see it. I will not send it to those who are not interested in what they regard as nonsense even before seeing the article. > > <<<reincarnation> >>> It has nothing to do with population counts. Horoscope of next or previous birth is not the same, similarly arrangement of 13 elements is also not same. > > <<< " 6227 worldwide has already been surpassed " >>> > No Sir ! You are talking of estimates, let the data come. " Experts " say world population will stabilize at 15-20 billions. Censuses are held once a decade. These censuses amay contain some irregularities, but 6 billion will not become 8 billion in actual census. There are many methods of counter checks at the disposal of demographers. > > <<<< Perhaps the day human beings crossed that number of 6227020800 Kaliyuga commenced! >>>> 6227 is not 'optimum'. It is a 'maximum' which will never be even touched, leave aside surpassing. otherwise, Saamkhya will need 14th and 15th elements, and the DATA presented in my population article you refused to see are false ! > > <<<< " I do not believe at all that anyone is doomed: Doomsdayers or Doom-sayers! " >>>> > Yes, Vedic religion has no scope for permanently Doomed states for souls. God is compassionate even for sinners and gives them innumerable chances to improve through innumerable rebirths. > > <<<< " Beta don't waste your time in all this 'crap' of magic, study and learn good things. " Only in these moments of stress which brings out the humanness that is within all of us and which indeed makes us human are the glimpses of reality! >>>> > > Take my words positively : You are putting Saamkhya in a wrong context. The opposite is true. In moments of real trouble, under border-line- situations of existentialists, humans are able to transcend " the social being " imposed by society through formal and informal education and are able to comprehend glimpses of transcendal reality which is otherwise occult and seems to be magic or hoax. It requires either Bolts from the Blue or extraordinary tapasyaa to " brings out the humanness that is within all of us and which indeed makes us human are the glimpses of reality! " , otherwise it is impossible to perceive anything beyond Lacanian " signifying chain " . > > Concrete answers to your questions and misgivings are there in population article, which you refused to receive through email. Astrological forums are not proper places for such articles. > > -VJ > ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= == > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:50:52 AM > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > Dear Vinay Ji, > > What I said in a private message to you when you expressed your discomfort about my 'non-astrological' postings was simply that I do not think Internet is a place for any serious discussion, astrological or otherwise :-) > > Have I said anything differently on any forum, otherwise? > > The non-seriousness and insincerity arises not from the forum, fora or Internet itself but those who choose to participate and contribute and interact! > > It is not the computer that we log-in from but that spark of divinity that types on it that can make the difference :-) > > I am almost feeling embarassed that I have to point such a simple fact and reminder to someone as uplifted as you, Vinay Ji! > > If an ordinary farmer like me with no accomplishments or presence can connect so amicably with you, and Sunil da and many others who you may feel are your enemies and can keep on answering and asking and make you all do the same reciprocally, surely something must be amiss? Or maybe nothing is! > > Or ever was ...? > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > RR Ji, > > OK, I will not send this population file to you. You have said yourself that these forums are not for serious discussions, and when I feel them I am charged of paranoia ! On these forums, I find persons like SKB " dada " who hate to read original Sanskrit texts even in translations and charge me of inventing wrong interpretations of ancient texts. They will deliberately distort population data out of all proportions and waste my time over useless controversies in wrong directions. You and Krishnan Ji are reducing these things to magic. Hence, I do not feel any need to discuss population on these fora. Some prople judge before they read the full thing. It occupies one full chapter in my forthcoming book on Suryasiddhanta, which has grown out of all proportions and I am struggling to keep it to size. > > -VJ > > > > ============ == ===== > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:18:26 AM > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > Why to RR ji? > > > > Why not here on J_R Forum as a message or file? Don't you trust us Vinay Ji? After all these wonderful reminders from members and moderators here on this wonderful forum! > > > > Why such residual paranoia, even here where you have said so much already? I hope all others have enjoyed similar privileges and allowances here as some of us have...! > > > > RR > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Prashant Ji, > > > You need not wait for 50 years. I will attain 50 18 months before you, I know you will see proofs within a decade. You say " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , which is based on present projections of past long term trends, but these projections do not take into account recent trends which clearly inficate a brake on overall growth. > > > > > > If " nothing will stop it from being surpassed " , then Saamkhya is wrong and we need 14th and 15th elements in kaarana shareera. i am sending the detailed population file to RR ji through email. > > > > > > -vj > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar@ ..> > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:27:27 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5- mis... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay ji > > > > > > well I have not misunderstood and may be u have to re-read the same lines again that u just said superimpose it with our traditional wisdom > > > > > > the lines that befit it will be > > > > > > different species keep coming and going , every day many species face extinction > > > > > > Human life is Durbhara says our vedas, purunas so a living being takes a human form after a few thousands of other forms of lives be it bacteria, insects, animals, plants birds, then human and in this probably all the species that r geting extinct may be on the promotional level to next level of births say bacteria may be becoming insects, insects may be becoming animals or plants. > > > animals may be becoing humans.... > > > > > > but what matters finally is the high and low limits that u quoted and as I suspected and RRji too felt > > > > > > it may bea Optimum level but nothing will stop it from being surpassed and to cut it back size or reverseit in 10 cycles we need only NUKE-BOMBING in diff parts of the world and higher level of WMD each time to loose a lot of puplation and again catch up 10 times. no pandemic, epidemic can > > > > > > the swine fle can target 2 billion pouplation it is feared by past estimates that is 1/3rd human pouplatiuon of today ONLY IF IT HAPPENS it fits ur statement else no, so pl post when and how the numbers get rediced if any in the next 50 yrs that is ur and my OPTIMUM LIFE TIME. > > > > > > I AM fast reaching 50 by 2011 Aug so another 50 or optimum of 120 [odds v hight for most of us] > > > so any natural pouplation reversal model, time is wlecome news > > > as global resources are bing fast abused by existing pouplation will we have enouh to EAT, DRINK, WEAR, SPACE TO LIVE, AIR TO BREATHE IS A tough ask even for the next 50-100 yrs > > > GANGA ITSELF WILL DRY up in less than 50 yrs Himalyan glaciers r already fast evpourating so where will water that sustains life in the Hindi belt of India will we have most o N India almost extinct by that time? or have sea water desalination plants pumping water to Himalayas ? > > > and N Indian cities > > > > > > Ganga is fast becoming a Nullah from a gigantic river. and surely our politicians will give puttas to the vote banks of the drying river banks, river beds apart from grabbing the max for themselves. no catchment ot water flow space will be left. > > > > > > THIS TREND WE HAVE SEEN ALREADYT IN MANY CITIES WITH LAKES, WATER BODIES LANDS BEING used as resedential colonies by state housing boards themselves. no ground water re-charging possible. > > > > > > will Kaliyuga last the distance I am sure we may never need 10 cycles 1st max 2nd is long enough. > > > > > > best wishe > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:53:27 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > > > You have misunderstood the whole point. Human population has a lower limit of 3.63 millions and an upper limit of 6227 millions, and one cycle od population explosion and implosion is od 43200 years, which means Kaliyuga must see ten cucles. > > > > > > Why you see population growing linearly ? Even scientists say one specie comes, grows and vanishes, then another comes and goes and so on. No specie is permanent. > > > > > > You do not believe in the cyclic theory of Kaala exponded in Puranas and jyotisha siddhantas, and see population growth as a linear unending phenomenon. Please try to understand ancient point of view. Whether it is right or wrong will be proved within a decade when actual census reports are published. At present you are misled by projections (estimates) which are not actual headcounts. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============ === ======= > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > > > Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:18:31 AM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation 12/5 > > > > > > Vinay ji, > > > > > > a v informative post and interesting reading and when it ends by saying Kaliyuga end is far away and by then what is the chance of pouplation stablization as u say even if the population moves one step forward and 1000 steps backward surely it will not be 7 billion but may be 7000000 Billions-theoritica lly well this number is symbolic or rythic not a projection by any means. > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 9:36:29 PM > > > Re: World Population : Saamkhya explanation > > > > > > Prashant ji, > > > > > > You are too curious. I am supplying one of the reasons why 6227 millions and no other figure, on the condition that I have no time for another useless controversy. This 'reason " is rooted in ancient Saamkhya darshana, which Lord Krishna eulogized as the culmination of Knowledge ( " na hi saamkhya samam jnaanan, na hi yuga samam balam " ). > > > > > > There are two basic entities : Prakriti and Purusha. Purusha is pure Consciousness and intrinsically indivisible, although individual manifestations of purusha entertain illusions of separateness by dint of their bondage to flesh as a result of their past karmas ensuing from desires. Saamkhya is philosophy of the liberated souls, and therefore does not differentiate individual soul from the Universal spirit, and labels both under a single term Jna, for which many ignorant dvaitvaadins charged Saamkhya of atheism. > > > > > > Prakriti, on the other hand, has 23 constituents, apart from itself. On one side, it has panch-mahabhootas (prithvi, jala...) and their five tan-maatraas (roopa, rasa, gandha, sparsha, shabda). Remaing 13 elements for the kaarana shareera and are therefore called karana (instruments) . There are three antah-karanas : buddhi, ahamkaara and mana, and teh baahya-karanas : five karma-indriyas and five jnaana-indriyas. > > > > > > The bhautika body does not accompany the soul after death. But the 13 elements accompany the soul from time immemorial, and will continue to accompany till final moksha. > > > > > > It is this kaarana-shareera which distinguises one jeeva from another. Astrologers know that even twins have some dofference in their charts. Similarly, all kaarana shareeras must have distinctive features to distinguish one jeeva from other. These distinctive features are of two types. One type is proportion of sins and virtues, which are stored in the form of desires with indriyas as Gita says. Birth into human yoni is caused when sins and virtues are approximately balanced with each other. Other type of distinctive features is related to uniqueness of a jeeva within a particular yoni. Since there are 13 constituent elements of kaarana shareera which takes a body during rebirth, there can be Factorial 13 (=13!) number of different distinctive combinations of these 13 elements. > > > > > > To put it otherwise, a language with 13 letters in its alphabet will have a maximum number of 13! different words in its language, on the condition that all words must have all 13 elements and every individual word must be unique in the sequence of these 13 letters. > > > > > > 13! is equal to 1 * 2 * 3 ..... *12 * 13 = 6,627,020,800 , or nearly 6227 millions. > > > > > > Sequence of 13 elements, with their unique proportions of sins and virtues, determines the overall character of a person and it is something like a translation of birthtime horoscope in another language. It is the actual GENETIC code, wnich is non-physical and cannot be deciphered by biologists, but the physical/chemical/ biological genetic code is a result of this non-physical genetic code. > > > > > > In this sequence, if antah-karana elements take precedence and are pilots, the person will be saaatvika and pious. But if the karma organ phallus occupies the driving seat, the person will become a sex maniac, irrespective of other good or bad qualities. > > > > > > During satyuga, antah-karana elements took precedence. Hence, Buddhi (saatvika in-tellect capable of listening to in-tuition, different from modern Machiavellian intelligence which is actually extelligence) was foremost leader, followed by Ahamkaara and then my Mana (the egency of Samkalpa). These three elements emained fixed in sequence, and only 10 indriyas could change places in the genetic code. Hence, population was limited to 10!, or to 3,628,800 when modern sub-specie of Homo Sapiens started evolving (actually devolving) in the year 40000 BCE. > > > > > > One khanda-kalpa is of 43200 years, 42000 years of avasarpini (devolution) and 1200 years of utsarpini (evolution). In 2000 AD (Saura Makara Samkraanti) our avasarpini kaala-khanda ended. During its 42000 years of devolution, population and entire world history moved along a logarithmic timescale based on ten defined by terrestrial loxodrome which is the path on Earth traversed by successive eclipses during millenia. Logarithmic base of ten meant population rose by one factorial point during one point on log scale. Hence, 42000 years befor 2000 AD, population was at 10!, but 4200 years before 2000 AD population rose to 11! or 40 millions in 2200 BC which demographers accept. And 420 years befor 2000 AD, human population reached 12! or 479 millions in 1580 AD ; demographers give estimates around 480 millions. > > > > > > After that the curve of population growth slowed down gradually, because 13! is the Time Bomb for extinction of human race, which Nature strives to prevent through various peaceful means like rise in impotency or unwillingness to have children as well as through wars, diseases, etc. > > > > > > At the time of return journey of Comet Hare Paap (Hale Bopp), 4.2 years before 14th Jan 2000 AD , human population was equal to 5784634179 , given by following equation : > > > > > > -1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - 5! + 6! - 7! + 8! - 9! + 10! - 11! + 12! - 13! = > > > > > > -1 + 2 - 6 + 24 - 120 + 720 - 5040 + 40320 - 362880 + 3628800 - 39916800 + 479001600 - 6227020800 > > > > > > When you put these terms in a statistical Series, you get Sum = 57846 lakhs which was actual population in the beginning of Nov 1995, 4.2 years before D-day of 14 Jan 2000 AD. > > > > > > This population was short of 13! by 4424 lakhs. They were deviants, who deviated from norms. Half of them deviated towards virtues, or at least rejected to abide by the rules of Kaliyugi society, and the other half rejected all morality and were uplifted (or downlifted) by D-day. These 2212 lakh sinners were Doomsdayers who raised a great hue and cry over impending Doomsday in 2000 AD. Instead of repenting and expiating for their sins, they tried to save others, and went headlong to Hell which their perverted brains imagined to be Next Higher World. Hence, world population on 14 Jan 2000 was 6005827490 at the time of Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti. > > > > > > Gregorian reform changed the onset of Christian calendar from Saurpakshiya Makara Samkraanti which was Jan 1 prior to reforms in 1582 AD. > > > > > > 420 years before 2000 AD was a turning point in world history when 13th factorial of population unfolded, after which Renaissance finally triumphed, physical science and materialism suppressed astrology and religion, and pirates looted the whole planet to bring about an Industrial Revolution, converting farmers into labourers. > > > > > > When this 13th factorial was near its culmination, the last indriya upastha (phallus) became free to take leadership roles. Homosexuality was even legalized in many materially " advanced " societies. Even traditional societies became open to free sex & c, forgetting that sex was meant for procreation and not for entertainment. Scientists say Homo Sapiens evolved out of vegetarian primate stock, but non-veg diet became a norm among the majority of those who could afford, including most of the scientists. To be anti-natural in all walks of life became a sign of progress at this 13! stage. > > > > > > After such (carnal) knowledge, what forgivance !(-Waste Land). Extinction of in-tuition and of in-telligence, telepathy, religion, piety, innocence, etc, and consequent extinction of libido and potency as well. Human potency has reduced to half during past five decades, which is a sign of impending extinction. > > > > > > But nothing to worry about. The Devolutionary phase of avasarpini is over, and evolutionary phase of utsarpini has just begun. Real Pralaya is 2.35 billions of years away, and even khanda pralaya at the end of Kaliyuga is 426891 years away. > > > > > > If anyone thinks modern unnatural man is capable of evolving into a better specie, it is a wishful figment of imagination. Species do not evolve automatically. Mortals will never see the hands of Mother Nature, Who oversees this miracle of Evolution, which we turn into Devolution. > > > > > > Nine years ago, an article like this would have invited threats and > > > bullets from prophets of Doomsday, but now I do not expect more than > > > some mild personal remarks or perhaps abuses. So much evolution has > > > already taken place during nine years of utsarpini ! > > > > > > I will not engage into any controversy. Those who differ will get proofs in due course of time. > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > ============ ======== ======= > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:29:02 PM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear Inder, > > > > > > tru it is heartening to note that and we r aware from time to time the Bhoo Devi will do its best to restore quilibrium or balance of forces in the world. > > > > > > but this limit of 6227 Billion sounds a bit interesting and want to know why this no and nothing more or less.... > > > and in what form will nature cut its nos to size > > > > > > the bird flu, swine flu, trunamis, terrorism have v little contribution on the numbers game... > > > and with ever expanding W asian pouplation across the stan nations it is amazing to see it really happen. > > > > > > Prashant > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > Inder <indervohra2001@ .co. in> > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 5:51:43 PM > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > This prediction about human population getting ultimately limited to 6227 Millions is very intersting and soothing. > > > It would provide much relief to people[like me] worrying about Global Warming and cosequent bad effects. > > > Inder > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > RR JI, > > > > > > > > You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) ! Let us see what we get next ...! " > > > > > > > > > > > > You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82% correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > > > > Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM > > > > Re: World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Krishnan Dada, > > > > > > > > Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be anything but underestimates as all know. > > > > > > > > Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has been 100% accurate with their predictions etc... > > > > > > > > Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall. > > > > > > > > I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within! Let us see what we get next ...! > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sirs, > > > > > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09 6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations. > > > > > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into these pronouncements. > > > > > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant for value addition and > > > > preciousness > > > > > nature such great human efforts. > > > > > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings > > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > vrkrishnan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> > > > > > World Population.. .? > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found this URL that may be of interest: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html > > > > > > > > > > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions and counting. > > > > > > > > > > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > > > Very interesting. ..! > > > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ....> wrote: > > > > > ><SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.