World Population...? Clinical Tests of Kundalee ???

May 12, 2009

RR Ji,

<<<< " if someone were to move from 60% success rate to say 95% success rate by

using a different technique or a different ayanamsha or whatever, and the

improvement is shown in otherwise fairly human jyotishis (no extrasensory

help!), that to me would indicate a successful clinical trial. Won't you agree?

Has such a human trial been conducted anywhere in the world? Perhaps that is

what we all should be focusing on rather than talking about numbers that we

cannot possibly estimate, let along count, such as actual world population or

astrological accuracy! ...Too much kheer is bad for the teeth and the body. " >>>>

All astrological softwares are released, or should be released, after a large

number of tests. I released Kundalee in 2005 AD to many traditional astrologers

of Hindi belt. I translated most essential pages into English only recently,

that is why I started releasing it through internet and fora just 4 months ago.

But even this English version was lying on my website since mid 2008. During all

these years even prior to its first release in 2005, I have conducted thousands

of clinical tests, and kundalee passed 100% of all after-the-event tests,

although there were occassions my predictions failed due to my limitations

either due to hurry or due to general limitations of humans to see holistically

all facets of all charts related to a person.

I published many examples of mundane astrology in 2005 AD in a Hindi book which

is now out of print and is being enlarged for reprint. now, I am translating

some portions and putting them on my webpages.

If you use any service pack of XP, I am sure you will find no difficulty in

installing the current version of Kundalee. It has removed many version-related

problems.

-VJ

============= ==========

________________________________

Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan

Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:48:38 AM

Re: World Population...?

Dear Vinay Ji,

Now that we are beginning to get down to the nitty gritty, it seems that even

with the best method or whatever, one will remain limited by their human-ness

and their inaccuracy may diminish from say 40% to 37.65%, no matter what. In

that instance would it be wise to change the methodology and move to something

different just because someone says so? I dont think that would be pragmatic.

Now if someone were to move from 60% success rate to say 95% success rate by

using a different technique or a different ayanamsha or whatever, and the

improvement is shown in otherwise fairly human jyotishis (no extrasensory

help!), that to me would indicate a successful clinical trial. Won't you agree?

Has such a human trial been conducted anywhere in the world? Perhaps that is

what we all should be focusing on rather than talking about numbers that we

cannot possibly estimate, let along count, such as actual world population or

astrological accuracy!

Too much kheer is bad for the teeth and the body...

RR

, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote:

>

> RR JI,

>

> You will certainlly get " some delicious 'kheer' pudding (arising within ??) !

Let us see what we get next ...! "

>

> You will see concrete evidence of 100% accurate method. I need some time to

put it on internet. It is another point whether VJ or RR ji is 50% or 82%

correct ; our human limitations does not make the science of astrology

inaccurate, provided the methods are not whimsical and are firmly based on

shaastras. There are so many charts in a single case and so many interrelations

between those charts that we often make mistakes. Personally, I am not

foolproof. But the method I speak of is foolproof, and I know how to prove it. I

have to translate my works in Hindi, and put it on webpages, besides answering a

large number of emails and updating my software, esp the English version which

is incomplete. Hence, I need some time for presenting the proofs.

>

> -VJ

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

>

> Monday, May 11, 2009 7:42:32 AM

> Re: World Population.. .?

>

> Dear Krishnan Dada,

>

> Of course all of these are estimates because as I said, even if these relied

on census and birth and death records which are a moving 'duck' as the

expression goes (One that quacks and waddles like a duck ;-)) with births and

deaths taking place all the time second to second -- the numbers would never be

anything but underestimates as all know.

>

> Isn't astrology an 'estimate' also ;-) Unless we have someone here who has

been 100% accurate with their predictions etc...

>

> Like Great Modern Varahmihira as Raman ji has been called, and rightly so

given his astounding mundane predictions and yeoman service to the cause of

Jyotish for decades and decades mentioned, I believe that Astrology is a study

of trends and possibilities and Sri KN Rao has often mentioned that even the

best astrologers go upto something like 82% success rate, overall.

>

> I feel a very strong hunger for some delicious 'kheer' pudding arising within!

Let us see what we get next ...!

>

> RR

>

> , vattem krishnan <bursar_99@ ..>

wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sirs,

> > The date given and estimated figures are always tentative and these

statistical compilation shall have some marginal errors of + or _ 2%( 07/01/09

6,790,062,216) .But can never be wild claculations.

> > Even brahma Vakyam too might have some vailidty.The base however will never

be explicable to find any logic.we accept all these pronouncements from various

siddhantas/authorit ies but very faithfully with out trying to read much into

these pronouncements.

> > I know Shri Vinaya Ji takes lot of pains and does selfless and volunatary

study in exploring siddhantas and making them useful for human consumption. For

that he utilises his time and money too but does not want to signify the immense

intrinsic value.Any information/ revealation that comes out of such great human

enedeavour should appropriately should have some tag.It is not that some one

intends to trade such immense and philonthropic efforts.To attempt and to do

that is also cruel.But if we calculate the time spent,material consumed it is

not that does not have value in pecuinary terms.For generous trading is utter

bad and meaningless. But intended seekers of Knowldge certainly appreciate

gestures of free service.keeping in mind that the future of Astrology and the

need for it's growth and development it is worth to consider to value products

on no profit and no loss basis.We also know the recent debate IPR too is meant

for value addition and

> preciousness

> > nature such great human efforts.

> > Infact mining the data and put into in meaningful way and stucture it and

prepare the material for test and utilisation further are significane

endeavours.we like it and support them and whole hearted .with no room for

insinnuations. But we can not remain as mute observers without compliments. But

these wishes when they emnate whole heartedly have no other meaning except

appreciation and only appreciation .if they sound otherwise,what else can be

done except to make our stand very lucid.Always human views/expression are

divergent and no body would like to condemn upright.But if read in a wrong sense

one has to feel sorry about it.As RR said the two cents are free and frank

opinions w/o looking for it's reactions/negative feelings

> > vrkrishnan

> >

> > --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Rohiniranjan <rohini_ranjan@ ...>

> > World Population.. .?

> >

> > Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:50 PM

> >

> > I found this URL that may be of interest:

> >

> > http://www.census. gov/ipc/www/ popclockworld. html

> >

> > According to this the world population has already exceeded 6778 millions

and counting.

> >

> > It is well known that census figures are underestimates, particularly in

countries that are massively populated, for a variety of reasons.

> >

> > Very interesting. ..!

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...>

wrote:

> > ><SNIP>

> > >

> > > Human race will never reach 7 billions. Demographers are giving out

projections base on past trends. But 6227 millions is the ultimate Lakshamana

Rekhaa which mankind is incapable of crossing. You will find its proof in about

a decade or two. It is a Brahma-vaakya.

> > >

> > > Sincerely,

> > >

> > > -VJ

> >

> > <SNIP>

> >

May 13, 2009

That is good to know. Now no one will have to guess as you keep answering our

questions and give background information. Isn't it a better use of your time?

RR

, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16 wrote:

>

> RR Ji,

>

> <<<< " if someone were to move from 60% success rate to say 95% success rate by

using a different technique or a different ayanamsha or whatever, and the

improvement is shown in otherwise fairly human jyotishis (no extrasensory

help!), that to me would indicate a successful clinical trial. Won't you agree?

Has such a human trial been conducted anywhere in the world? Perhaps that is

what we all should be focusing on rather than talking about numbers that we

cannot possibly estimate, let along count, such as actual world population or

astrological accuracy! ...Too much kheer is bad for the teeth and the body. " >>>>

>

> All astrological softwares are released, or should be released, after a large