'Lord Krishna existed. School texts are wrong'

[Guest guest]

Interesting texts from the below link are

 

Pandit, as the sutradhar of the documentary Krishna: History or Myth?, uses four

pillars -- archaeology, linguistics, what he calls the living tradition of India

and astronomy to arrive at the circumstantial verdict that Krishna was indeed a

living being, because Mahabharata and the battle of Kurukshetra indeed happened,

and since Krishna was the pivot of the Armageddon, it is all true.

 

 

3067 BC is when the Mahabharata war took place, says Dr Achar. How did he arrive

at this?

 

There are more than 140 astronomy references in the Mahabharata. Dr Achar used

simulations of the night sky to arrive at November 22, 3067 BC, as the day the

Mahabharata war began.

 

There is a gentleman named Ram Prasad Birbal, who said he has found many bones

which are said to belong to the Kurukshetra battle. Has this been scientifically

proved?

 

Ram Prasad Birbal is a resident of Kurukshetra. I am not aware of carbon dating

of those bones. But I am informed that thermo-luminescent dating of other relics

as well as carbon-dating at other sites in Kurukshetra have given dates far

older than the Indus valley civilisation. Further, Euan Mackie, an eminent

archaeologist, had found a clay tablet of Krishna's Yamalaarjuna episode at

Mohenjedaro, a site of the Indus Valley civilisation proving that even in 2200

BC, there was a culture of worshipping Krishna.