Guest guest Posted November 11, 2009 Report Share Posted November 11, 2009 Dear Code,You have been replied your Correct birth time and it is 4:35:30PM at that time Ascendant Sub lord Mercury is = Star lord of Moon i.e Mercury.Sub Sub lord of Ascendant is Rahu = Sub lord of Moon i.e Rahu. How do you say that you have not been replid. Dhirendra Nath Misra  ________________________________ Suresh Babu <sureshbabuag Wed, November 11, 2009 1:36:59 PM Re: please help  Dear Code, It is not correct and truthfull to say that you have not been answered in the forum. You were answered and only your request to correct TOB was not taken up. This is because traditional astrologers don't support this view. The TOB as provided by the parents or hospital should only be present for analysis. If the astrologer feels that it is not correct according him, it is his perogative to correct it according to the he follows and provide solutions and predictions according to his system. But this corrected TOB should never be provided to other astrologers who might be using a different system for analysis. If you search the Internet and make a reaserch, you shall find that only a certain group of Astrologers give so much importance for TOB correction who infact are less than 1% of the Astrologers in India. That is why senior Astrologers on this forum did not take up that request. There are 1000's of factors that determine the time right from the Sunrise to computation of position of planets, ayanamsa etc. Any slight variation in these (even in seconds) shall vary many factors. So it is pointless to correct TOB beyond a limit. Ideally it is corrected within a few seconds to a minute or two and not beyond that. However, predictions do not always depend on such accuracy of the planets positions but on numerous other factors. As you have stated about the luck factor, Astrology is a devine science and it should revered as such. Time one aproaches an astrologer, the way he speaks / write and what etc, all counts for responce he might back. By the way what is this " code code " . don't you have a name provided by your parents? providing such irrelavent names is hiding oneself. from whom? & what & why? ask yourself. is it so shamefull to be revealed? Those who are genuine will never do that. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Mr Code, > Infcat you are also special as we have positive views from mebers like you.The Group considers such comments from members as positive as it helps in to look into short comings if any.Negative feelings come up only if taken in personal way. > > > Vattem Krishnan > Cyber Jyotish Services > (For all counseling services) >  > > --- On Tue, 11/10/09, Code Code <codecode@.. .> wrote: > > > Code Code <codecode@.. .> > Re: please help > > Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 12:44 PM > > >  > > > > Dear Naina, > > Aren't you the very lucky one, recieving prompt responses from astrologiers and from more then two of them at a time/consecutively. They all seem to be devoting there time to your queries and getting answers out to you the very same day.Woowah. > I am glad to see that your worries and questions are being met by them, but sad how other forum members like my self don't really get speedy responses let alone a response to our further queries to the answers they gave. > > You must be special in some way!! > > Good luck, and I hope God blesses you and Keval with long and loving life together. > > Sincere Best wishes > Code > PS: No doubt the moderator and or the Astrologiers' will respond to what I wrote here taking a negative stand point of what I am saying. Right? > >  > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > naina <nira_1 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> > > Tue, 10 November, 2009 14:00:47 > Re: please help > >  > Dear Suresh Babu ji > > wow, i am impressed and thank you! you are praise worthy that without knowing us, you have pinpointed out traits spot on :-). > > from looking at my chart, you probably have figured also i get confused easily, and alway want the best which is not a good thing either so i beleive in any boys case i would try and change things about them. > > you are very correct about both of out natures and i am aware of that and coming to acceptance. i have discussed this issue about our natures with him and he does not see it as a issue, in contrast he still wants to continue just as much. > > the only thing i am concerned about is, that if we do continue, i beleive on an emotional level we can comprimise and make it work, but is their any thing out of our control that will become a factor of worry in our married life ( e.g you mentioned children ). i just want to be sure that either one of us is not " bad " for each other. > > thankyou soo much for your guidence, you have really helped me > > naina > > , " Suresh Babu " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Naina, > > > > Let me try to put this in proper perspective , what Shree Prashant Ji & Krishna Ji are trying to tell you. > > > > First of all understand that the marriage is between you two and only both of you are responcible for your happiness & sorrow. > > > > Astrology can only indicate ceratin traits & outcome. However if both of you have the confidence that you can overcome the negatives - whether it is due to character / atittude or by external factors , both known & unknown and still love and care for each other, you can both go ahead and get married. > > > > As per Kerala system, We check 10 point based nakshatra koota and out of 10 this gets only 5 > > > > Your horoscope is considered a Papa Jataka while his is Sudha jataka. > > > > You have > > 1) 7th of Moon - Saturn = 1 point > > 2) 8th of Moon - Mars = 1 Point > > 3) 7th of Venus - Mars = 1 point > > Total of 3 Malefic points = Papa Jataka > > > > he does not any malefic planets in th 7th of Lagna, Moon & Venus and hence his horoscope is considered sudha jataka. Such people also will generaly be simpltons and without malice in their minds. Many a times submissive and will not even know if any one cheats them. > > > > In contrast, your character is not so. > > > > In due course, you may look at his simple thinking & way of life as weakness and start to object & correct him. While he may consider your aggressiveness or atittude too much for his liking. > > > > If you both can understand these traits and accept each other as such and take a responcible decission, there is no problem for marriage. > > > > The only support is the Rina-Dhana relationship which is quite good, that is supposed to have gained from previous life. > > > > So on one hand the matching is poor and on the other hand , the relationship and what you feel for each other gains upper hand. The question you have to ask yourself and each other, can you withstand the rigours of life and hold on to each other through the thick & thin and stormy times. > > > > Astrologers can only point out the positives & negatives. But it upto you to weigh them and take an intelligent decission. It is solely your responcibility. > > > > In fact you should discuss this issue with him frankly and see his opinion. If he not willing to go ahead or support you, you know there is no point in going ahead. > > > > 5th house in both the charts have heavy malefic influence, hence this could lead to problems regarding projeny also. > > > > > > So consider all the above and discuss with your family and your friend and decide. > > > > There is no point in asking again and again the same questions. > > > > If you decide to get married you may approach after the marriage for any remedies that may be required later in case of progeny etc. > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2009 Report Share Posted November 11, 2009 Dear Dhrendra Nath Misra, I did not say I have not been replied too. I have replied to Suresh ji & JR forum as he has miss understood my mail to Naina and now his comments is creating a flux of miss-understandings. Unfortunately my reply to Suresh has not been posted out to the forum, which clearly explains things and the very fact that I appreciated your feedback. The site moderator has not issued my email apparently due to the fact that it doesn't stretch that fare....In fact it seems the democratic freedom of expressing and explaining/clarity has been cesead by the very fact of not allowing my response to Suresh to be read by all. That in fact utters alot in unspokenly terms. Please do not feel that I have not appreciated your hard work and time you spend on my reading, My post says nothing to that affect. You should read that and not soley rely on what Suresh has negatively deduced. If I can I will try to forward the response to you to your direct email so you are reassured that I had no qowarms about not getting responses, but merely about the speed. Suresh, this is exactly what I mean.....in my response to you (Prashant felt he couldn't authorise this email out, but prephaps you can ask him to forward it onto instead). Your negative miss understanding has created a ripple affect and causing unneccessary clouds of dissappointments. Dear Moderator/Prashant, it would be good if you could prehaps provide my resp to Suresh in parts if that be, so to difuse further dissappointments to all concerned due to someones miss understanding and miss interpretations. Regadrdx c ________________________________ Dhirendra Nath Misra <dhirendranathmisra Wed, 11 November, 2009 13:51:50 Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976,London ,U.K  Dear Code,You have been replied your Correct birth time and it is 4:35:30PM at that time Ascendant Sub lord Mercury is = Star lord of Moon i.e Mercury.Sub Sub lord of Ascendant is Rahu = Sub lord of Moon i.e Rahu. How do you say that you have not been replid. Dhirendra Nath Misra  ____________ _________ _________ __ Suresh Babu <sureshbabuag@ > Wed, November 11, 2009 1:36:59 PM Re: please help  Dear Code, It is not correct and truthfull to say that you have not been answered in the forum. You were answered and only your request to correct TOB was not taken up. This is because traditional astrologers don't support this view. The TOB as provided by the parents or hospital should only be present for analysis. If the astrologer feels that it is not correct according him, it is his perogative to correct it according to the he follows and provide solutions and predictions according to his system. But this corrected TOB should never be provided to other astrologers who might be using a different system for analysis. If you search the Internet and make a reaserch, you shall find that only a certain group of Astrologers give so much importance for TOB correction who infact are less than 1% of the Astrologers in India. That is why senior Astrologers on this forum did not take up that request. There are 1000's of factors that determine the time right from the Sunrise to computation of position of planets, ayanamsa etc. Any slight variation in these (even in seconds) shall vary many factors. So it is pointless to correct TOB beyond a limit. Ideally it is corrected within a few seconds to a minute or two and not beyond that. However, predictions do not always depend on such accuracy of the planets positions but on numerous other factors. As you have stated about the luck factor, Astrology is a devine science and it should revered as such. Time one aproaches an astrologer, the way he speaks / write and what etc, all counts for responce he might back. By the way what is this " code code " . don't you have a name provided by your parents? providing such irrelavent names is hiding oneself. from whom? & what & why? ask yourself. is it so shamefull to be revealed? Those who are genuine will never do that. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Mr Code, > Infcat you are also special as we have positive views from mebers like you.The Group considers such comments from members as positive as it helps in to look into short comings if any.Negative feelings come up only if taken in personal way. > > > Vattem Krishnan > Cyber Jyotish Services > (For all counseling services) >  > > --- On Tue, 11/10/09, Code Code <codecode@.. .> wrote: > > > Code Code <codecode@.. .> > Re: please help > > Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 12:44 PM > > >  > > > > Dear Naina, > > Aren't you the very lucky one, recieving prompt responses from astrologiers and from more then two of them at a time/consecutively. They all seem to be devoting there time to your queries and getting answers out to you the very same day.Woowah. > I am glad to see that your worries and questions are being met by them, but sad how other forum members like my self don't really get speedy responses let alone a response to our further queries to the answers they gave. > > You must be special in some way!! > > Good luck, and I hope God blesses you and Keval with long and loving life together. > > Sincere Best wishes > Code > PS: No doubt the moderator and or the Astrologiers' will respond to what I wrote here taking a negative stand point of what I am saying. Right? > >  > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > naina <nira_1 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> > > Tue, 10 November, 2009 14:00:47 > Re: please help > >  > Dear Suresh Babu ji > > wow, i am impressed and thank you! you are praise worthy that without knowing us, you have pinpointed out traits spot on :-). > > from looking at my chart, you probably have figured also i get confused easily, and alway want the best which is not a good thing either so i beleive in any boys case i would try and change things about them. > > you are very correct about both of out natures and i am aware of that and coming to acceptance. i have discussed this issue about our natures with him and he does not see it as a issue, in contrast he still wants to continue just as much. > > the only thing i am concerned about is, that if we do continue, i beleive on an emotional level we can comprimise and make it work, but is their any thing out of our control that will become a factor of worry in our married life ( e.g you mentioned children ). i just want to be sure that either one of us is not " bad " for each other. > > thankyou soo much for your guidence, you have really helped me > > naina > > , " Suresh Babu " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Naina, > > > > Let me try to put this in proper perspective , what Shree Prashant Ji & Krishna Ji are trying to tell you. > > > > First of all understand that the marriage is between you two and only both of you are responcible for your happiness & sorrow. > > > > Astrology can only indicate ceratin traits & outcome. However if both of you have the confidence that you can overcome the negatives - whether it is due to character / atittude or by external factors , both known & unknown and still love and care for each other, you can both go ahead and get married. > > > > As per Kerala system, We check 10 point based nakshatra koota and out of 10 this gets only 5 > > > > Your horoscope is considered a Papa Jataka while his is Sudha jataka. > > > > You have > > 1) 7th of Moon - Saturn = 1 point > > 2) 8th of Moon - Mars = 1 Point > > 3) 7th of Venus - Mars = 1 point > > Total of 3 Malefic points = Papa Jataka > > > > he does not any malefic planets in th 7th of Lagna, Moon & Venus and hence his horoscope is considered sudha jataka. Such people also will generaly be simpltons and without malice in their minds. Many a times submissive and will not even know if any one cheats them. > > > > In contrast, your character is not so. > > > > In due course, you may look at his simple thinking & way of life as weakness and start to object & correct him. While he may consider your aggressiveness or atittude too much for his liking. > > > > If you both can understand these traits and accept each other as such and take a responcible decission, there is no problem for marriage. > > > > The only support is the Rina-Dhana relationship which is quite good, that is supposed to have gained from previous life. > > > > So on one hand the matching is poor and on the other hand , the relationship and what you feel for each other gains upper hand. The question you have to ask yourself and each other, can you withstand the rigours of life and hold on to each other through the thick & thin and stormy times. > > > > Astrologers can only point out the positives & negatives. But it upto you to weigh them and take an intelligent decission. It is solely your responcibility. > > > > In fact you should discuss this issue with him frankly and see his opinion. If he not willing to go ahead or support you, you know there is no point in going ahead. > > > > 5th house in both the charts have heavy malefic influence, hence this could lead to problems regarding projeny also. > > > > > > So consider all the above and discuss with your family and your friend and decide. > > > > There is no point in asking again and again the same questions. > > > > If you decide to get married you may approach after the marriage for any remedies that may be required later in case of progeny etc. > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2009 Report Share Posted November 11, 2009 Dear code, I have sent a cc to a few seniors and suresh babu ji too and whatever it be u will have to deal with them in private I HAVE CLEARLY COVERED UR SENTIMENTS, FEELING already in JR - still u complain as it went too far only and by experience we know such exchanges waste group time space, ur point is taken no doubt and also appreciate ur feedback HENCE COVRED JUST THE CORE issues not the entire stuff. but u have not acknowledged my mail prior to Suresh ji where I also have asked the same, it was not offensive as u see with every mail asking or saying i have to asked. to which u never replied even once. and urs is not the 1st u can see many such cases I do ask ppl to explain as i have asked u a name, a face make a lot of difference we have not yet come to star war or star trek lives to call each one by a unique code, number or SSN ID etc. till then some names do help and what has caused all this in the 1st place calling Naina lucky and not ur csae with many replies like misra ji , i a am sure i did in the past 10 monhts at least once. prashant ________________________________ Code Code <codecode Wed, November 11, 2009 10:19:48 PM Re: Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976,London ,U.K Dear Dhrendra Nath Misra, I did not say I have not been replied too. I have replied to Suresh ji & JR forum as he has miss understood my mail to Naina and now his comments is creating a flux of miss-understandings . Unfortunately my reply to Suresh has not been posted out to the forum, which clearly explains things and the very fact that I appreciated your feedback. The site moderator has not issued my email apparently due to the fact that it doesn't stretch that fare....In fact it seems the democratic freedom of expressing and explaining/clarity has been cesead by the very fact of not allowing my response to Suresh to be read by all. That in fact utters alot in unspokenly terms. Please do not feel that I have not appreciated your hard work and time you spend on my reading, My post says nothing to that affect. You should read that and not soley rely on what Suresh has negatively deduced. If I can I will try to forward the response to you to your direct email so you are reassured that I had no qowarms about not getting responses, but merely about the speed. Suresh, this is exactly what I mean.....in my response to you (Prashant felt he couldn't authorise this email out, but prephaps you can ask him to forward it onto instead). Your negative miss understanding has created a ripple affect and causing unneccessary clouds of dissappointments. Dear Moderator/Prashant, it would be good if you could prehaps provide my resp to Suresh in parts if that be, so to difuse further dissappointments to all concerned due to someones miss understanding and miss interpretations. Regadrdx c ____________ _________ _________ __ Dhirendra Nath Misra <dhirendranathmisra@ ymail.com> Wed, 11 November, 2009 13:51:50 Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976, London ,U.K Dear Code,You have been replied your Correct birth time and it is 4:35:30PM at that time Ascendant Sub lord Mercury is = Star lord of Moon i.e Mercury.Sub Sub lord of Ascendant is Rahu = Sub lord of Moon i.e Rahu. How do you say that you have not been replid. Dhirendra Nath Misra ____________ _________ _________ __ Suresh Babu <sureshbabuag@ > Wed, November 11, 2009 1:36:59 PM Re: please help Dear Code, It is not correct and truthfull to say that you have not been answered in the forum. You were answered and only your request to correct TOB was not taken up. This is because traditional astrologers don't support this view. The TOB as provided by the parents or hospital should only be present for analysis. If the astrologer feels that it is not correct according him, it is his perogative to correct it according to the he follows and provide solutions and predictions according to his system. But this corrected TOB should never be provided to other astrologers who might be using a different system for analysis. If you search the Internet and make a reaserch, you shall find that only a certain group of Astrologers give so much importance for TOB correction who infact are less than 1% of the Astrologers in India. That is why senior Astrologers on this forum did not take up that request. There are 1000's of factors that determine the time right from the Sunrise to computation of position of planets, ayanamsa etc. Any slight variation in these (even in seconds) shall vary many factors. So it is pointless to correct TOB beyond a limit. Ideally it is corrected within a few seconds to a minute or two and not beyond that. However, predictions do not always depend on such accuracy of the planets positions but on numerous other factors. As you have stated about the luck factor, Astrology is a devine science and it should revered as such. Time one aproaches an astrologer, the way he speaks / write and what etc, all counts for responce he might back. By the way what is this " code code " . don't you have a name provided by your parents? providing such irrelavent names is hiding oneself. from whom? & what & why? ask yourself. is it so shamefull to be revealed? Those who are genuine will never do that. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Mr Code, > Infcat you are also special as we have positive views from mebers like you.The Group considers such comments from members as positive as it helps in to look into short comings if any.Negative feelings come up only if taken in personal way. > > > Vattem Krishnan > Cyber Jyotish Services > (For all counseling services) >  > > --- On Tue, 11/10/09, Code Code <codecode@.. .> wrote: > > > Code Code <codecode@.. .> > Re: please help > > Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 12:44 PM > > >  > > > > Dear Naina, > > Aren't you the very lucky one, recieving prompt responses from astrologiers and from more then two of them at a time/consecutively. They all seem to be devoting there time to your queries and getting answers out to you the very same day.Woowah. > I am glad to see that your worries and questions are being met by them, but sad how other forum members like my self don't really get speedy responses let alone a response to our further queries to the answers they gave. > > You must be special in some way!! > > Good luck, and I hope God blesses you and Keval with long and loving life together. > > Sincere Best wishes > Code > PS: No doubt the moderator and or the Astrologiers' will respond to what I wrote here taking a negative stand point of what I am saying. Right? > >  > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > naina <nira_1 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> > > Tue, 10 November, 2009 14:00:47 > Re: please help > >  > Dear Suresh Babu ji > > wow, i am impressed and thank you! you are praise worthy that without knowing us, you have pinpointed out traits spot on :-). > > from looking at my chart, you probably have figured also i get confused easily, and alway want the best which is not a good thing either so i beleive in any boys case i would try and change things about them. > > you are very correct about both of out natures and i am aware of that and coming to acceptance. i have discussed this issue about our natures with him and he does not see it as a issue, in contrast he still wants to continue just as much. > > the only thing i am concerned about is, that if we do continue, i beleive on an emotional level we can comprimise and make it work, but is their any thing out of our control that will become a factor of worry in our married life ( e.g you mentioned children ). i just want to be sure that either one of us is not " bad " for each other. > > thankyou soo much for your guidence, you have really helped me > > naina > > , " Suresh Babu " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Naina, > > > > Let me try to put this in proper perspective , what Shree Prashant Ji & Krishna Ji are trying to tell you. > > > > First of all understand that the marriage is between you two and only both of you are responcible for your happiness & sorrow. > > > > Astrology can only indicate ceratin traits & outcome. However if both of you have the confidence that you can overcome the negatives - whether it is due to character / atittude or by external factors , both known & unknown and still love and care for each other, you can both go ahead and get married. > > > > As per Kerala system, We check 10 point based nakshatra koota and out of 10 this gets only 5 > > > > Your horoscope is considered a Papa Jataka while his is Sudha jataka. > > > > You have > > 1) 7th of Moon - Saturn = 1 point > > 2) 8th of Moon - Mars = 1 Point > > 3) 7th of Venus - Mars = 1 point > > Total of 3 Malefic points = Papa Jataka > > > > he does not any malefic planets in th 7th of Lagna, Moon & Venus and hence his horoscope is considered sudha jataka. Such people also will generaly be simpltons and without malice in their minds. Many a times submissive and will not even know if any one cheats them. > > > > In contrast, your character is not so. > > > > In due course, you may look at his simple thinking & way of life as weakness and start to object & correct him. While he may consider your aggressiveness or atittude too much for his liking. > > > > If you both can understand these traits and accept each other as such and take a responcible decission, there is no problem for marriage. > > > > The only support is the Rina-Dhana relationship which is quite good, that is supposed to have gained from previous life. > > > > So on one hand the matching is poor and on the other hand , the relationship and what you feel for each other gains upper hand. The question you have to ask yourself and each other, can you withstand the rigours of life and hold on to each other through the thick & thin and stormy times. > > > > Astrologers can only point out the positives & negatives. But it upto you to weigh them and take an intelligent decission. It is solely your responcibility. > > > > In fact you should discuss this issue with him frankly and see his opinion. If he not willing to go ahead or support you, you know there is no point in going ahead. > > > > 5th house in both the charts have heavy malefic influence, hence this could lead to problems regarding projeny also. > > > > > > So consider all the above and discuss with your family and your friend and decide. > > > > There is no point in asking again and again the same questions. > > > > If you decide to get married you may approach after the marriage for any remedies that may be required later in case of progeny etc. > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2009 Report Share Posted November 11, 2009 Dear Mis/Mrs code who ever you are. I don't have to read your messages to me to understand what you are. these messages spell a lot I am already 50 and you have nothing more to teach me other than to avoid such persons and never try to drive some sense in them even remotely, let alone provide any advices. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ________________________________ Code Code <codecode Wed, November 11, 2009 10:19:48 PM Re: Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976,London ,U.K  Dear Dhrendra Nath Misra, I did not say I have not been replied too. I have replied to Suresh ji & JR forum as he has miss understood my mail to Naina and now his comments is creating a flux of miss-understandings . Unfortunately my reply to Suresh has not been posted out to the forum, which clearly explains things and the very fact that I appreciated your feedback. The site moderator has not issued my email apparently due to the fact that it doesn't stretch that fare....In fact it seems the democratic freedom of expressing and explaining/clarity has been cesead by the very fact of not allowing my response to Suresh to be read by all. That in fact utters alot in unspokenly terms. Please do not feel that I have not appreciated your hard work and time you spend on my reading, My post says nothing to that affect. You should read that and not soley rely on what Suresh has negatively deduced. If I can I will try to forward the response to you to your direct email so you are reassured that I had no qowarms about not getting responses, but merely about the speed. Suresh, this is exactly what I mean.....in my response to you (Prashant felt he couldn't authorise this email out, but prephaps you can ask him to forward it onto instead). Your negative miss understanding has created a ripple affect and causing unneccessary clouds of dissappointments. Dear Moderator/Prashant, it would be good if you could prehaps provide my resp to Suresh in parts if that be, so to difuse further dissappointments to all concerned due to someones miss understanding and miss interpretations. Regadrdx c ____________ _________ _________ __ Dhirendra Nath Misra <dhirendranathmisra@ ymail.com> Wed, 11 November, 2009 13:51:50 Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976, London ,U.K  Dear Code,You have been replied your Correct birth time and it is 4:35:30PM at that time Ascendant Sub lord Mercury is = Star lord of Moon i.e Mercury.Sub Sub lord of Ascendant is Rahu = Sub lord of Moon i.e Rahu. How do you say that you have not been replid. Dhirendra Nath Misra  ____________ _________ _________ __ Suresh Babu <sureshbabuag@ > Wed, November 11, 2009 1:36:59 PM Re: please help  Dear Code, It is not correct and truthfull to say that you have not been answered in the forum. You were answered and only your request to correct TOB was not taken up. This is because traditional astrologers don't support this view. The TOB as provided by the parents or hospital should only be present for analysis. If the astrologer feels that it is not correct according him, it is his perogative to correct it according to the he follows and provide solutions and predictions according to his system. But this corrected TOB should never be provided to other astrologers who might be using a different system for analysis. If you search the Internet and make a reaserch, you shall find that only a certain group of Astrologers give so much importance for TOB correction who infact are less than 1% of the Astrologers in India. That is why senior Astrologers on this forum did not take up that request. There are 1000's of factors that determine the time right from the Sunrise to computation of position of planets, ayanamsa etc. Any slight variation in these (even in seconds) shall vary many factors. So it is pointless to correct TOB beyond a limit. Ideally it is corrected within a few seconds to a minute or two and not beyond that. However, predictions do not always depend on such accuracy of the planets positions but on numerous other factors. As you have stated about the luck factor, Astrology is a devine science and it should revered as such. Time one aproaches an astrologer, the way he speaks / write and what etc, all counts for responce he might back. By the way what is this " code code " . don't you have a name provided by your parents? providing such irrelavent names is hiding oneself. from whom? & what & why? ask yourself. is it so shamefull to be revealed? Those who are genuine will never do that. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Mr Code, > Infcat you are also special as we have positive views from mebers like you.The Group considers such comments from members as positive as it helps in to look into short comings if any.Negative feelings come up only if taken in personal way. > > > Vattem Krishnan > Cyber Jyotish Services > (For all counseling services) >  > > --- On Tue, 11/10/09, Code Code <codecode@.. .> wrote: > > > Code Code <codecode@.. .> > Re: please help > > Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 12:44 PM > > >  > > > > Dear Naina, > > Aren't you the very lucky one, recieving prompt responses from astrologiers and from more then two of them at a time/consecutively. They all seem to be devoting there time to your queries and getting answers out to you the very same day.Woowah. > I am glad to see that your worries and questions are being met by them, but sad how other forum members like my self don't really get speedy responses let alone a response to our further queries to the answers they gave. > > You must be special in some way!! > > Good luck, and I hope God blesses you and Keval with long and loving life together. > > Sincere Best wishes > Code > PS: No doubt the moderator and or the Astrologiers' will respond to what I wrote here taking a negative stand point of what I am saying. Right? > >  > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > naina <nira_1 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> > > Tue, 10 November, 2009 14:00:47 > Re: please help > >  > Dear Suresh Babu ji > > wow, i am impressed and thank you! you are praise worthy that without knowing us, you have pinpointed out traits spot on :-). > > from looking at my chart, you probably have figured also i get confused easily, and alway want the best which is not a good thing either so i beleive in any boys case i would try and change things about them. > > you are very correct about both of out natures and i am aware of that and coming to acceptance. i have discussed this issue about our natures with him and he does not see it as a issue, in contrast he still wants to continue just as much. > > the only thing i am concerned about is, that if we do continue, i beleive on an emotional level we can comprimise and make it work, but is their any thing out of our control that will become a factor of worry in our married life ( e.g you mentioned children ). i just want to be sure that either one of us is not " bad " for each other. > > thankyou soo much for your guidence, you have really helped me > > naina > > , " Suresh Babu " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Naina, > > > > Let me try to put this in proper perspective , what Shree Prashant Ji & Krishna Ji are trying to tell you. > > > > First of all understand that the marriage is between you two and only both of you are responcible for your happiness & sorrow. > > > > Astrology can only indicate ceratin traits & outcome. However if both of you have the confidence that you can overcome the negatives - whether it is due to character / atittude or by external factors , both known & unknown and still love and care for each other, you can both go ahead and get married. > > > > As per Kerala system, We check 10 point based nakshatra koota and out of 10 this gets only 5 > > > > Your horoscope is considered a Papa Jataka while his is Sudha jataka. > > > > You have > > 1) 7th of Moon - Saturn = 1 point > > 2) 8th of Moon - Mars = 1 Point > > 3) 7th of Venus - Mars = 1 point > > Total of 3 Malefic points = Papa Jataka > > > > he does not any malefic planets in th 7th of Lagna, Moon & Venus and hence his horoscope is considered sudha jataka. Such people also will generaly be simpltons and without malice in their minds. Many a times submissive and will not even know if any one cheats them. > > > > In contrast, your character is not so. > > > > In due course, you may look at his simple thinking & way of life as weakness and start to object & correct him. While he may consider your aggressiveness or atittude too much for his liking. > > > > If you both can understand these traits and accept each other as such and take a responcible decission, there is no problem for marriage. > > > > The only support is the Rina-Dhana relationship which is quite good, that is supposed to have gained from previous life. > > > > So on one hand the matching is poor and on the other hand , the relationship and what you feel for each other gains upper hand. The question you have to ask yourself and each other, can you withstand the rigours of life and hold on to each other through the thick & thin and stormy times. > > > > Astrologers can only point out the positives & negatives. But it upto you to weigh them and take an intelligent decission. It is solely your responcibility. > > > > In fact you should discuss this issue with him frankly and see his opinion. If he not willing to go ahead or support you, you know there is no point in going ahead. > > > > 5th house in both the charts have heavy malefic influence, hence this could lead to problems regarding projeny also. > > > > > > So consider all the above and discuss with your family and your friend and decide. > > > > There is no point in asking again and again the same questions. > > > > If you decide to get married you may approach after the marriage for any remedies that may be required later in case of progeny etc. > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 Dear Prashant, Thank you for responding back continuely in association to this matter. It is indeed pleasing to find that my posts are being replied to speedly now, though it is unrelated to my astro-queries. It doesn't matter now, because I am happy to at least recieve some form of acknowledgment be it negative in nature or elders just simply smacking my hand via words in emails. At least I got some form of resp/reaction, and I am content with that!!! You state below " still u complain " . Not sure why you have said this.....what have I done wrong NOW? By replying to DNMirsa of 12.11.09, is not complaining. It is merely being polite to reassure him that due to miss understandings the claim that I had not been responded to was made. As my resp to Sureh was not (understandably) posted, how is Mr DNMirsa to know this. So it is only right to not allow DNMisra to think that his afforts have gone without praise. Is it wrong to provide clarification to someone to clear the polluted air? surely not!!! Prasant, I felt I needed to address and make points of concerns, and I feel I have done this in my resp to Suresh and as fare as I was concerned that was it, and I no longer need to dwell and keep addressing this matter, because what needed to be said was said, and the reactions I expected I'm indeed reading. Now...I don't believe it is worth to even attempt to reason with the content of your email/you/Suresh, only because all you see is wrongs/faults abt me. As a moderator or mediator you ought to be netural in your advocations and not appear to be taking sides. If I was one of the astrologers on this forum I'll be very happy to hide behind you to justify my actions for me. It is comendable of you to provide and support your colleague....it is good. But think about how not being netural is letting your service users down. You say you have " clearly covered ur sentiments, feeling " , you have in fact attempted to do that but in actuall fact what you have done/said was to provide justicfication around what Suresh said,(that is good) and then draw and pick on aspects to promote wrongs/faults failures at my end. How is that covering sentiments? No where in your resp have you acknowldeged or corrected Suresh's error, but repeatdly find some thing to correct/comment abt my actions. I understood and digested your comments you made to me and respected what you shared, not because I accept the contents but purely because the vibe I got from your mails was that you are trying to make me understand, you were not being rude in tone, nor where you being aggressive/egoistic in your approach/ words. And that is the reason why I didn't latch on few things you have said in your resp to me, and took on the chin.... WHat I'm saying is that I didn't react to you what unhelpful points you have made, only because the tone, lang and vibe was not of ill affect from you. I appreciate your mature outlook even though I know/understand that some digs are being made at me. But I do think less sacasim and patronisation would be good start and that could be born in minds too. I know we are not in the age of Star Wars, and don;t think I had implied that either. Thank you....but I do know what had started this cyber disppointment off in the first place. What you fail to acknowldege and sensibly defuse is that what was said shouldn't not have been said, apologies and lets move on. No instead you troll back to the past and draw up past email ref and point this to me. You need to stick to the issue and not complicate things further. If you are talking about the one and only first reply I got from you dated 14.04.09, then I did resp to that and had no feedback from you. But I have not used this against you-have I?. Furhter more, I did divulge myself at request of one astro. So I fail to still your/suresh points around all this matter. It is futile to even if I try to amend things or even attempt to reason, or anything I could possible say. So, logic and intelligencs dictates that no point in further this matter. And only respond to mails if needs be and if its worthy of a resps. So, I shall not " keep waste time " as you put it, and should the seniors and your self communicate to me, I am more then very happy to reply to you. So, lets draw a line under this, and make you and some of the astrolgoers happy by allowing you to have the last word/dig. As you say " ....few seniors and suresh babu ji too and whatever it be u will have to deal with them in private "  Prashant , just so ;you know....I have not taken any thing you said to and about me offensively, and vis-versa. You have tried to be coherant in what you said and explain/justify. For that I show my appreciate to you......as that is all thta is needed for comprehension, and thus no need for mocking people in a public domain. But just a friendly advise ease up on your sacasim a little, it would help.  Oooops I guess this mails has stretched too!!!  Best Wishes  ________________________________ Prashant Kumar G B <gbp_kumar Wed, 11 November, 2009 17:16:52 Re: Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976,London ,U.K  Dear code, I have sent a cc to a few seniors and suresh babu ji too and whatever it be u will have to deal with them in private I HAVE CLEARLY COVERED UR SENTIMENTS, FEELING already in JR - still u complain as it went too far only and by experience we know such exchanges waste group time space, ur point is taken no doubt and also appreciate ur feedback HENCE COVRED JUST THE CORE issues not the entire stuff. but u have not acknowledged my mail prior to Suresh ji where I also have asked the same, it was not offensive as u see with every mail asking or saying i have to asked. to which u never replied even once. and urs is not the 1st u can see many such cases I do ask ppl to explain as i have asked u a name, a face make a lot of difference we have not yet come to star war or star trek lives to call each one by a unique code, number or SSN ID etc. till then some names do help and what has caused all this in the 1st place calling Naina lucky and not ur csae with many replies like misra ji , i a am sure i did in the past 10 monhts at least once. prashant ____________ _________ _________ __ Code Code <codecode (AT) ymail (DOT) com> Wed, November 11, 2009 10:19:48 PM Re: Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976, London ,U.K Dear Dhrendra Nath Misra, I did not say I have not been replied too. I have replied to Suresh ji & JR forum as he has miss understood my mail to Naina and now his comments is creating a flux of miss-understandings . Unfortunately my reply to Suresh has not been posted out to the forum, which clearly explains things and the very fact that I appreciated your feedback. The site moderator has not issued my email apparently due to the fact that it doesn't stretch that fare....In fact it seems the democratic freedom of expressing and explaining/clarity has been cesead by the very fact of not allowing my response to Suresh to be read by all. That in fact utters alot in unspokenly terms. Please do not feel that I have not appreciated your hard work and time you spend on my reading, My post says nothing to that affect. You should read that and not soley rely on what Suresh has negatively deduced. If I can I will try to forward the response to you to your direct email so you are reassured that I had no qowarms about not getting responses, but merely about the speed. Suresh, this is exactly what I mean.....in my response to you (Prashant felt he couldn't authorise this email out, but prephaps you can ask him to forward it onto instead). Your negative miss understanding has created a ripple affect and causing unneccessary clouds of dissappointments. Dear Moderator/Prashant, it would be good if you could prehaps provide my resp to Suresh in parts if that be, so to difuse further dissappointments to all concerned due to someones miss understanding and miss interpretations. Regadrdx c ____________ _________ _________ __ Dhirendra Nath Misra <dhirendranathmisra @ ymail.com> Wed, 11 November, 2009 13:51:50 Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976, London ,U.K Dear Code,You have been replied your Correct birth time and it is 4:35:30PM at that time Ascendant Sub lord Mercury is = Star lord of Moon i.e Mercury.Sub Sub lord of Ascendant is Rahu = Sub lord of Moon i.e Rahu. How do you say that you have not been replid. Dhirendra Nath Misra ____________ _________ _________ __ Suresh Babu <sureshbabuag@ > Wed, November 11, 2009 1:36:59 PM Re: please help Dear Code, It is not correct and truthfull to say that you have not been answered in the forum. You were answered and only your request to correct TOB was not taken up. This is because traditional astrologers don't support this view. The TOB as provided by the parents or hospital should only be present for analysis. If the astrologer feels that it is not correct according him, it is his perogative to correct it according to the he follows and provide solutions and predictions according to his system. But this corrected TOB should never be provided to other astrologers who might be using a different system for analysis. If you search the Internet and make a reaserch, you shall find that only a certain group of Astrologers give so much importance for TOB correction who infact are less than 1% of the Astrologers in India. That is why senior Astrologers on this forum did not take up that request. There are 1000's of factors that determine the time right from the Sunrise to computation of position of planets, ayanamsa etc. Any slight variation in these (even in seconds) shall vary many factors. So it is pointless to correct TOB beyond a limit. Ideally it is corrected within a few seconds to a minute or two and not beyond that. However, predictions do not always depend on such accuracy of the planets positions but on numerous other factors. As you have stated about the luck factor, Astrology is a devine science and it should revered as such. Time one aproaches an astrologer, the way he speaks / write and what etc, all counts for responce he might back. By the way what is this " code code " . don't you have a name provided by your parents? providing such irrelavent names is hiding oneself. from whom? & what & why? ask yourself. is it so shamefull to be revealed? Those who are genuine will never do that. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Mr Code, > Infcat you are also special as we have positive views from mebers like you.The Group considers such comments from members as positive as it helps in to look into short comings if any.Negative feelings come up only if taken in personal way. > > > Vattem Krishnan > Cyber Jyotish Services > (For all counseling services) >  > > --- On Tue, 11/10/09, Code Code <codecode@.. .> wrote: > > > Code Code <codecode@.. .> > Re: please help > > Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 12:44 PM > > >  > > > > Dear Naina, > > Aren't you the very lucky one, recieving prompt responses from astrologiers and from more then two of them at a time/consecutively. They all seem to be devoting there time to your queries and getting answers out to you the very same day.Woowah. > I am glad to see that your worries and questions are being met by them, but sad how other forum members like my self don't really get speedy responses let alone a response to our further queries to the answers they gave. > > You must be special in some way!! > > Good luck, and I hope God blesses you and Keval with long and loving life together. > > Sincere Best wishes > Code > PS: No doubt the moderator and or the Astrologiers' will respond to what I wrote here taking a negative stand point of what I am saying. Right? > >  > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > naina <nira_1 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> > > Tue, 10 November, 2009 14:00:47 > Re: please help > >  > Dear Suresh Babu ji > > wow, i am impressed and thank you! you are praise worthy that without knowing us, you have pinpointed out traits spot on :-). > > from looking at my chart, you probably have figured also i get confused easily, and alway want the best which is not a good thing either so i beleive in any boys case i would try and change things about them. > > you are very correct about both of out natures and i am aware of that and coming to acceptance. i have discussed this issue about our natures with him and he does not see it as a issue, in contrast he still wants to continue just as much. > > the only thing i am concerned about is, that if we do continue, i beleive on an emotional level we can comprimise and make it work, but is their any thing out of our control that will become a factor of worry in our married life ( e.g you mentioned children ). i just want to be sure that either one of us is not " bad " for each other. > > thankyou soo much for your guidence, you have really helped me > > naina > > , " Suresh Babu " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Naina, > > > > Let me try to put this in proper perspective , what Shree Prashant Ji & Krishna Ji are trying to tell you. > > > > First of all understand that the marriage is between you two and only both of you are responcible for your happiness & sorrow. > > > > Astrology can only indicate ceratin traits & outcome. However if both of you have the confidence that you can overcome the negatives - whether it is due to character / atittude or by external factors , both known & unknown and still love and care for each other, you can both go ahead and get married. > > > > As per Kerala system, We check 10 point based nakshatra koota and out of 10 this gets only 5 > > > > Your horoscope is considered a Papa Jataka while his is Sudha jataka. > > > > You have > > 1) 7th of Moon - Saturn = 1 point > > 2) 8th of Moon - Mars = 1 Point > > 3) 7th of Venus - Mars = 1 point > > Total of 3 Malefic points = Papa Jataka > > > > he does not any malefic planets in th 7th of Lagna, Moon & Venus and hence his horoscope is considered sudha jataka. Such people also will generaly be simpltons and without malice in their minds. Many a times submissive and will not even know if any one cheats them. > > > > In contrast, your character is not so. > > > > In due course, you may look at his simple thinking & way of life as weakness and start to object & correct him. While he may consider your aggressiveness or atittude too much for his liking. > > > > If you both can understand these traits and accept each other as such and take a responcible decission, there is no problem for marriage. > > > > The only support is the Rina-Dhana relationship which is quite good, that is supposed to have gained from previous life. > > > > So on one hand the matching is poor and on the other hand , the relationship and what you feel for each other gains upper hand. The question you have to ask yourself and each other, can you withstand the rigours of life and hold on to each other through the thick & thin and stormy times. > > > > Astrologers can only point out the positives & negatives. But it upto you to weigh them and take an intelligent decission. It is solely your responcibility. > > > > In fact you should discuss this issue with him frankly and see his opinion. If he not willing to go ahead or support you, you know there is no point in going ahead. > > > > 5th house in both the charts have heavy malefic influence, hence this could lead to problems regarding projeny also. > > > > > > So consider all the above and discuss with your family and your friend and decide. > > > > There is no point in asking again and again the same questions. > > > > If you decide to get married you may approach after the marriage for any remedies that may be required later in case of progeny etc. > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 I'm glad you have taken away at least something for your development.....good to acknowledge that. Doesn't matter how old one is Sir..............learning never ends, we learn all through out our lives and develope through the courses of our journy and encounters with others. You are never too OLD to learn, and there is always something out there we dont know, and we later get to know. So do bare in mind.............humans' we don't know everything as we like to think as much. Suresh you take care now, and I shall try to forget!! Sincere Good wishes. ________________________________ Suresh Babu.A.G <sureshbabuag Wed, 11 November, 2009 17:19:04 Re: Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976,London ,U.K  Dear Mis/Mrs code who ever you are. I don't have to read your messages to me to understand what you are. these messages spell a lot I am already 50 and you have nothing more to teach me other than to avoid such persons and never try to drive some sense in them even remotely, let alone provide any advices. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy ____________ _________ _________ __ Code Code <codecode (AT) ymail (DOT) com> Wed, November 11, 2009 10:19:48 PM Re: Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976, London ,U.K  Dear Dhrendra Nath Misra, I did not say I have not been replied too. I have replied to Suresh ji & JR forum as he has miss understood my mail to Naina and now his comments is creating a flux of miss-understandings . Unfortunately my reply to Suresh has not been posted out to the forum, which clearly explains things and the very fact that I appreciated your feedback. The site moderator has not issued my email apparently due to the fact that it doesn't stretch that fare....In fact it seems the democratic freedom of expressing and explaining/clarity has been cesead by the very fact of not allowing my response to Suresh to be read by all. That in fact utters alot in unspokenly terms. Please do not feel that I have not appreciated your hard work and time you spend on my reading, My post says nothing to that affect. You should read that and not soley rely on what Suresh has negatively deduced. If I can I will try to forward the response to you to your direct email so you are reassured that I had no qowarms about not getting responses, but merely about the speed. Suresh, this is exactly what I mean.....in my response to you (Prashant felt he couldn't authorise this email out, but prephaps you can ask him to forward it onto instead). Your negative miss understanding has created a ripple affect and causing unneccessary clouds of dissappointments. Dear Moderator/Prashant, it would be good if you could prehaps provide my resp to Suresh in parts if that be, so to difuse further dissappointments to all concerned due to someones miss understanding and miss interpretations. Regadrdx c ____________ _________ _________ __ Dhirendra Nath Misra <dhirendranathmisra @ ymail.com> Wed, 11 November, 2009 13:51:50 Correct Birth Time of Code Code is 4:35:30 PM,27.04.1976, London ,U.K  Dear Code,You have been replied your Correct birth time and it is 4:35:30PM at that time Ascendant Sub lord Mercury is = Star lord of Moon i.e Mercury.Sub Sub lord of Ascendant is Rahu = Sub lord of Moon i.e Rahu. How do you say that you have not been replid. Dhirendra Nath Misra  ____________ _________ _________ __ Suresh Babu <sureshbabuag@ > Wed, November 11, 2009 1:36:59 PM Re: please help  Dear Code, It is not correct and truthfull to say that you have not been answered in the forum. You were answered and only your request to correct TOB was not taken up. This is because traditional astrologers don't support this view. The TOB as provided by the parents or hospital should only be present for analysis. If the astrologer feels that it is not correct according him, it is his perogative to correct it according to the he follows and provide solutions and predictions according to his system. But this corrected TOB should never be provided to other astrologers who might be using a different system for analysis. If you search the Internet and make a reaserch, you shall find that only a certain group of Astrologers give so much importance for TOB correction who infact are less than 1% of the Astrologers in India. That is why senior Astrologers on this forum did not take up that request. There are 1000's of factors that determine the time right from the Sunrise to computation of position of planets, ayanamsa etc. Any slight variation in these (even in seconds) shall vary many factors. So it is pointless to correct TOB beyond a limit. Ideally it is corrected within a few seconds to a minute or two and not beyond that. However, predictions do not always depend on such accuracy of the planets positions but on numerous other factors. As you have stated about the luck factor, Astrology is a devine science and it should revered as such. Time one aproaches an astrologer, the way he speaks / write and what etc, all counts for responce he might back. By the way what is this " code code " . don't you have a name provided by your parents? providing such irrelavent names is hiding oneself. from whom? & what & why? ask yourself. is it so shamefull to be revealed? Those who are genuine will never do that. A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. , Vattem Krishnan <bursar_99@. ..> wrote: > > Dear Mr Code, > Infcat you are also special as we have positive views from mebers like you.The Group considers such comments from members as positive as it helps in to look into short comings if any.Negative feelings come up only if taken in personal way. > > > Vattem Krishnan > Cyber Jyotish Services > (For all counseling services) >  > > --- On Tue, 11/10/09, Code Code <codecode@.. .> wrote: > > > Code Code <codecode@.. .> > Re: please help > > Tuesday, November 10, 2009, 12:44 PM > > >  > > > > Dear Naina, > > Aren't you the very lucky one, recieving prompt responses from astrologiers and from more then two of them at a time/consecutively. They all seem to be devoting there time to your queries and getting answers out to you the very same day.Woowah. > I am glad to see that your worries and questions are being met by them, but sad how other forum members like my self don't really get speedy responses let alone a response to our further queries to the answers they gave. > > You must be special in some way!! > > Good luck, and I hope God blesses you and Keval with long and loving life together. > > Sincere Best wishes > Code > PS: No doubt the moderator and or the Astrologiers' will respond to what I wrote here taking a negative stand point of what I am saying. Right? > >  > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > naina <nira_1 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> > > Tue, 10 November, 2009 14:00:47 > Re: please help > >  > Dear Suresh Babu ji > > wow, i am impressed and thank you! you are praise worthy that without knowing us, you have pinpointed out traits spot on :-). > > from looking at my chart, you probably have figured also i get confused easily, and alway want the best which is not a good thing either so i beleive in any boys case i would try and change things about them. > > you are very correct about both of out natures and i am aware of that and coming to acceptance. i have discussed this issue about our natures with him and he does not see it as a issue, in contrast he still wants to continue just as much. > > the only thing i am concerned about is, that if we do continue, i beleive on an emotional level we can comprimise and make it work, but is their any thing out of our control that will become a factor of worry in our married life ( e.g you mentioned children ). i just want to be sure that either one of us is not " bad " for each other. > > thankyou soo much for your guidence, you have really helped me > > naina > > , " Suresh Babu " <sureshbabuag@ ...> wrote: > > > > Dear Naina, > > > > Let me try to put this in proper perspective , what Shree Prashant Ji & Krishna Ji are trying to tell you. > > > > First of all understand that the marriage is between you two and only both of you are responcible for your happiness & sorrow. > > > > Astrology can only indicate ceratin traits & outcome. However if both of you have the confidence that you can overcome the negatives - whether it is due to character / atittude or by external factors , both known & unknown and still love and care for each other, you can both go ahead and get married. > > > > As per Kerala system, We check 10 point based nakshatra koota and out of 10 this gets only 5 > > > > Your horoscope is considered a Papa Jataka while his is Sudha jataka. > > > > You have > > 1) 7th of Moon - Saturn = 1 point > > 2) 8th of Moon - Mars = 1 Point > > 3) 7th of Venus - Mars = 1 point > > Total of 3 Malefic points = Papa Jataka > > > > he does not any malefic planets in th 7th of Lagna, Moon & Venus and hence his horoscope is considered sudha jataka. Such people also will generaly be simpltons and without malice in their minds. Many a times submissive and will not even know if any one cheats them. > > > > In contrast, your character is not so. > > > > In due course, you may look at his simple thinking & way of life as weakness and start to object & correct him. While he may consider your aggressiveness or atittude too much for his liking. > > > > If you both can understand these traits and accept each other as such and take a responcible decission, there is no problem for marriage. > > > > The only support is the Rina-Dhana relationship which is quite good, that is supposed to have gained from previous life. > > > > So on one hand the matching is poor and on the other hand , the relationship and what you feel for each other gains upper hand. The question you have to ask yourself and each other, can you withstand the rigours of life and hold on to each other through the thick & thin and stormy times. > > > > Astrologers can only point out the positives & negatives. But it upto you to weigh them and take an intelligent decission. It is solely your responcibility. > > > > In fact you should discuss this issue with him frankly and see his opinion. If he not willing to go ahead or support you, you know there is no point in going ahead. > > > > 5th house in both the charts have heavy malefic influence, hence this could lead to problems regarding projeny also. > > > > > > So consider all the above and discuss with your family and your friend and decide. > > > > There is no point in asking again and again the same questions. > > > > If you decide to get married you may approach after the marriage for any remedies that may be required later in case of progeny etc. > > > > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.