Rohinicrystal -Blood Sugar:Unit mg /dL is not replace even today by mmol/L

[Guest guest]

Rohinicrystal Babu- Go through use of Wikipedia . Unit mg/dL to show sugar level

is not replaced even today.

Diabetes mellitus is characterized by recurrent or persistent hyperglycemia, and

is diagnosed by demonstrating any one of the following:

* Fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L).

* Plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) two hours after a 75 g

oral glucose load as in a glucose tolerance test.

* Symptoms of hyperglycemia and casual plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL

(11.1 mmol/L).

A positive result, in the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, should be

confirmed by a repeat of any of the above-listed methods on a different day.

Most physicians prefer to measure a fasting glucose level because of the ease of

measurement and the considerable time commitment of formal glucose tolerance

testing, which takes two hours to complete and offers no prognostic advantage

over the fasting test.According to the current definition, two fasting glucose

measuremen

Diabetes mellitus is characterized by recurrent or persistent hyperglycemia, and

is diagnosed by demonstrating any one of the following:

* Fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L).

* Plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) two hours after a 75 g

oral glucose load as in a glucose tolerance test.

* Symptoms of hyperglycemia and casual plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL

(11.1 mmol/L).

A positive result, in the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, should be

confirmed by a repeat of any of the above-listed methods on a different day.

Most physicians prefer to measure a fasting glucose level because of the ease of

measurement and the considerable time commitment of formal glucose tolerance

testing, which takes two hours to complete and offers no prognostic advantage

over the fasting test.According to the current definition, two fasting glucose

measurements above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) is considered diagnostic for

diabetes mellitus.

Patients with fasting glucose levels from 100 to 125 mg/dL (6.1 and

7.0 mmol/L) are considered to have impaired fasting glucose. Patients with

plasma glucose at or above 140 mg/dL or 7.8 mmol/L, but not over 200, two

hours after a 75 g oral glucose load are considered to have impaired glucose

tolerance. Of these two pre-diabetic states, the latter in particular is a major

risk factor for progression to full-blown diabetes mellitus as well as

cardiovascular disease.

Diabetes mellitus is characterized by recurrent or persistent hyperglycemia, and

is diagnosed by demonstrating any one of the following:

* Fasting plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L).

* Plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) two hours after a 75 g

oral glucose load as in a glucose tolerance test.

* Symptoms of hyperglycemia and casual plasma glucose at or above 200 mg/dL

(11.1 mmol/L).

A positive result, in the absence of unequivocal hyperglycemia, should be

confirmed by a repeat of any of the above-listed methods on a different day.

Most physicians prefer to measure a fasting glucose level because of the ease of

measurement and the considerable time commitment of formal glucose tolerance

testing, which takes two hours to complete and offers no prognostic advantage

over the fasting test.According to the current definition, two fasting glucose

measurements above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) is considered diagnostic for

diabetes mellitus.

Patients with fasting glucose levels from 100 to 125 mg/dL (6.1 and

7.0 mmol/L) are considered to have impaired fasting glucose. Patients with

plasma glucose at or above 140 mg/dL or 7.8 mmol/L, but not over 200, two

hours after a 75 g oral glucose load are considered to have impaired glucose

tolerance. Of these two pre-diabetic states, the latter in particular is a major

risk factor for progression to full-blown diabetes mellitus as well as

cardiovascular disease.

ts above 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) is considered diagnostic for diabetes

mellitus.

Patients with fasting glucose levels from 100 to 125 mg/dL (6.1 and

7.0 mmol/L) are considered to have impaired fasting glucose. Patients with

plasma glucose at or above 140 mg/dL or 7.8 mmol/L, but not over 200, two

hours after a 75 g oral glucose load are considered to have impaired glucose

tolerance. Of these two pre-diabetic states, the latter in particular is a major

risk factor for progression to full-blown diabetes mellitus as well as

cardiovascular disease.

With thanks & regards,

 

Dhirendra Nath Misra

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani

 

Sat, December 5, 2009 5:58:35 AM

Re: Suffering from high Blood Sugar i.e 525.90

 

 

Dhirendra Babu,

 

Please use Wikipedia to educate yourself about how many decades ago mg/dL was

replaced by mM units :-)

Or ask your personal physician, if you have one!

 

It is not something critical, don't take things so personally, particularly

since it would not enable anyone to appreciate the astrology behind all that!

And who knows -- perhaps the astrological perspectives of the diseases may be

very different from the modern-medicine understanding of the process! Afterall,

ayurveda deals with diseases in a different manner just as homeopathy views

health and disease in a very different way than modern medicine! Does it not?

 

RR_,

 

, Dhirendra Nath Misra

<dhirendranathmisra wrote:

>

> Dear Sir,

>             It is known to all that amount

of  Sugar in the blood is generally  measured in mg / decilitre unit

..You may suggest any new information regarding this ,if it is known to

you.Respected Sushama Ji or any other member has not revealed any new unit for

you to which you are giving air.

> With thanks and regards, 

> Dhirendra Nath Misra

>  

>

>

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...>

>

> Fri, December 4, 2009 8:54:48 AM

> Re: Suffering from high Blood Sugar i.e 525.90

>

>  

> Before we begin to lobby Kumar jee and Tanvir jee to rename this forum as

Health_Remedies Forum, please allow me to thank Sushma_jee for alerting us to

this new <<BS>> unit! I presume by BS, this thread meant BLOOD SUGAR and not

some derogatory reference to Nandi jee's Prasaad?

>

> Sugar in the blood was measured, according to the sources I questioned, in two

units alone!

>

> mg/decilitre that gave the values like 120, 180 etc

>

> or millimoles per litre of glucose that gave values like 5 (normal) or so!

>

> Unless some NEW standard for <<BS>> has been established that talks about

levels in the 500s, may I timidly suggest that we, collectively, get our facts

straight before we spread this wonderful information about BS?

>

> , " Sushma " <bhagvatjee@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Dhirendra Nath Ji

> > Jaya Siyaa Raam

> > Sorry to know about your such a high blood sugar lever. Are you sure that it

is 525.90. Ideally it should not be more than 140 in any case. 525 is indeed too

high. Make sure that if it is so.

> >

> > You may start eating Chanaa flour roti (either mixed with Jau flour or with

whole wheat flour). When you are not eating this roti, you may eat Chana Daal.

Karela juice is really a big task, as Deepak Sharma has suggested, but ther

simple things are easy to do.

> >

> > You may try Daalcheenee powder 1/4 teaspoon, two times a day. Just swallow

it like a Chooran. But make sure of your number is 525.

> > Take care,

> > With regards

> > Sushma

> >

> > , Dhirendra Nath Misra

<dhirendranathmisra @> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Senior Astrologers & Doctors,Good Morning,Since last one month I was

feeling in day time as if I could not sleep soundly in the night and

consequently  I felt laziness and buzzing sound in my right ear.Besides this

I felt urine problem also.On 17.11.2009 I got my BS checked and found that BS

pp is very high at 525.90.I am taking my  self  one tablet of Gemer

P2 twice daily.By which planet pancreas is indicated.I am sending this query

at 8:52AM on 18.11.2009 .Please guide me in this regard,

> > > With thanks & regards, 

> > > Dhirendra Nath Misra

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >