Guest guest Posted September 11, 2001 Report Share Posted September 11, 2001 Om Gurave Namah -------------------------- Dear Nimmi, Phyl, Sanjay, Bharminder and all others, Thanks for your desire to help this cause. I am trying an alternative and hope this works. The Bankers in india need to wake up.... Give me some time on this and after my return on the 25th, i shall be able to tell you. Best Wishes Sanjay Rath - Nimmi Ragavan <106350.3660 <vedic astrology > Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:46 PM Re: [vedic astrology] BPHS > Dear Sanjay, > > I would be very happy to to this fund. > > Regards, > > Nimmi > - > " Sanjay Rath " <srath > <vedic astrology > > Friday, September 07, 2001 8:30 PM > Re: [vedic astrology] BPHS > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > -------------------------- > > Dear majid, > > We are all waiting for someone else to do it, and again, can this be the > > best method of working on BPHS? I wonder. i want to go to Puri for a year > to > > do this work. Who will fund me is the next question???? > > Best Wishes > > Sanjay Rath > > - > > <majid > > <vedic astrology > > > Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:42 PM > > Re: [vedic astrology] BPHS > > > > > > > Namaste! > > > I wonder why someone has not set up a forum online for the correct > > > translation of BPHS or at least a discussion of the various " conflicts " > in > > the > > > translations and then solicited interest in both Jyotishi and Sanskrit > > > Scholars. I think the " net " is a perfect place for this type of > exchange. > > By the > > > way are there any " good " manuscripts left anywhere in the world? > > > Om Sri Ganapati Ki Jai! > > > Majid Buell > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of John FontaineWednesday, April 19, 2006 11:15 AMsohamsa Subject: BPHS Hare Rama Krishna Dear Members, Can anyone please tell me how I might be able to find the BPHS for use on a computer that has the transliteration of the text (as well as the translation)? And thank you SJ for your response on Narendra Desai, etc Thank you. John Fontaine - vijayadas_pradeep sohamsa Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:44 AM Re: Dalai Lama, Tibetan BPHS & Outer Planets-Correction Ra/Ke Dear Respected membersRegarding Stellar Lordship of Rahu/Ketu,i had mentioned Artha/Moksha andthere is a small correction.1)Rahu lordship(Ardra,Swati,Shathabhishak) always starts between waterand fire(Vrishchika and Dhanu).It always happens in a Kaama sign - whileconsidering navamsha lordships(basis for stellar division).2)Ketu lordship(Ashwini,Magha,Moola) always start between water andfire(Meena and Mesha). It always falls in between Moksha and Dharmasigns.Another interesting point to note is, as, Signs from 1 through 8(Ariesto Scorpio) are infact representing the life of an individual(Birththrough death) & 9 through 12 the balance sheet,Rahu and Ketu starsalways border -these Signs- ie either 8/9(Vrischika-Dhanu or12/1(Meena-Mesha).Why Rahu is taking one more towards Kaama and Ketu towards Moksha may beunderlying within this stellatr lordship pattern.But as these two arethe links which connects,Soul and Mind,their main role can be thechurning - Churning of Paalazhi for Amrit - through intermittentappearances,within the 120 year life span.Hope learned members will share their thoughts.Pradeepsohamsa , "vijayadas_pradeep"<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:>> Dear Sunil,Chandrashekhar ji and respected members>> I personally feel,Vedic Jyotish system has been defined,using 7planets> 12 houses and nodes,taking care of all attributes pertaining to a> Jataka.Upagrahas,Gulika/Mandi etc do not have any dasha or ownership> attributed.> Sages have clearly mentioned that 7 planets from Sun through Saturnare> taking care of all attributes from Soul through Oldage/diseases.Thusthe> system can be complete,and influence based on distance,may not be the> criterion .> Sun and Moon have distributed the 10 signs,apart from their ownsigns,to> the remaining 5 planets.Thus Rahu and Ketu do not own any signs.Rahuand> Ketu are the links connecting Soul and Mind.Rahu/Ketu being nodalpoints> connected to Sun/Moon is confirming this.Also if we check stellar> ownership of Rahu/Ketu we can find the Moksha and Arthapattern,clearly.> Thus i feel as scholars like chandrahari has opined,the system was> defined with a one to one correspondence between pindandam and> brahmandam(micro/macro).Yogis were able to observe breath pattern and> then relate them with the movement speed of planets.As Jyotish isabout> events along the cycle of time,they were able to find correspondences> between planets following specific time patterns,and prana.>> Still it is an interesting info from Shri Sunil,and it will be worth> investigating,how they were employed.>> Respect> Pradeep>> sohamsa , Sunil John suniljohn_2002@ wrote:> >> > OM Datta Guru> >> > Dear Members> >> > Pranam> >> > Does anyone has English or hindi translation of the Tibetan Version> of BPHS (Brihat Parasara Hora Shastra)> >> > The reason I ask is that a friend of mine met the Dalai Lama a year> back and when Sri Dalai Lama saw his chart he started discussing itand> then explained few things with the outer planets (Uranus PlutoNeptune).> Friend interrupted the Spiritual Leader and said that this is notvedic> astrology as in vedic astrology outer planets are not mentioned. Upon> this Dalai Lama mentioned that the Version of BPHS they have in that> Sage Parasara has clearly mentioned Outer Planets.> >> > I personally think that a person of the calibre of Dalai Lama would> not lie about the outer planets & if this BPHS version is true then it> might prove often what some nadi texts have said about Outer planets & > their usage.> >> > It seems the Tibetans guard their astrology texts very sacredly & > hence maybe so far an English version so far has not come out nor any> book on Kalachakra Dasa from their corner of the world though many> elders acknowledge that the real secrets of KCD are with the Tibetans.> It is also said that during the mughal invasion of India, many> manuscripts of ours were carried to Tibet via the Afghanistan route & > have never come back.> >> > Maybe some of you are into Tibetan astrology & might possess a> private english work of the translation of their BPHS or might know> Tibetan astrology pls mail me privately on suniljohn_2002@ shall be> indebted.> >> > Love & Light,> >> >> > Sunil John> > Mumbai> >> >> > > > New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PCand> save big.> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2006 Report Share Posted May 10, 2006 Hare Rama Krishna, Great! Thanks for sending that. John Fontaine - Ramesh F. Gangaramani sohamsa Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:10 PM RE: BPHS sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of John FontaineWednesday, April 19, 2006 11:15 AMsohamsa Subject: BPHS Hare Rama Krishna Dear Members, Can anyone please tell me how I might be able to find the BPHS for use on a computer that has the transliteration of the text (as well as the translation)? And thank you SJ for your response on Narendra Desai, etc Thank you. John Fontaine - vijayadas_pradeep sohamsa Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:44 AM Re: Dalai Lama, Tibetan BPHS & Outer Planets-Correction Ra/Ke Dear Respected membersRegarding Stellar Lordship of Rahu/Ketu,i had mentioned Artha/Moksha andthere is a small correction.1)Rahu lordship(Ardra,Swati,Shathabhishak) always starts between waterand fire(Vrishchika and Dhanu).It always happens in a Kaama sign - whileconsidering navamsha lordships(basis for stellar division).2)Ketu lordship(Ashwini,Magha,Moola) always start between water andfire(Meena and Mesha). It always falls in between Moksha and Dharmasigns.Another interesting point to note is, as, Signs from 1 through 8(Ariesto Scorpio) are infact representing the life of an individual(Birththrough death) & 9 through 12 the balance sheet,Rahu and Ketu starsalways border -these Signs- ie either 8/9(Vrischika-Dhanu or12/1(Meena-Mesha).Why Rahu is taking one more towards Kaama and Ketu towards Moksha may beunderlying within this stellatr lordship pattern.But as these two arethe links which connects,Soul and Mind,their main role can be thechurning - Churning of Paalazhi for Amrit - through intermittentappearances,within the 120 year life span.Hope learned members will share their thoughts.Pradeepsohamsa , "vijayadas_pradeep"<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:>> Dear Sunil,Chandrashekhar ji and respected members>> I personally feel,Vedic Jyotish system has been defined,using 7planets> 12 houses and nodes,taking care of all attributes pertaining to a> Jataka.Upagrahas,Gulika/Mandi etc do not have any dasha or ownership> attributed.> Sages have clearly mentioned that 7 planets from Sun through Saturnare> taking care of all attributes from Soul through Oldage/diseases.Thusthe> system can be complete,and influence based on distance,may not be the> criterion .> Sun and Moon have distributed the 10 signs,apart from their ownsigns,to> the remaining 5 planets.Thus Rahu and Ketu do not own any signs.Rahuand> Ketu are the links connecting Soul and Mind.Rahu/Ketu being nodalpoints> connected to Sun/Moon is confirming this.Also if we check stellar> ownership of Rahu/Ketu we can find the Moksha and Arthapattern,clearly.> Thus i feel as scholars like chandrahari has opined,the system was> defined with a one to one correspondence between pindandam and> brahmandam(micro/macro).Yogis were able to observe breath pattern and> then relate them with the movement speed of planets.As Jyotish isabout> events along the cycle of time,they were able to find correspondences> between planets following specific time patterns,and prana.>> Still it is an interesting info from Shri Sunil,and it will be worth> investigating,how they were employed.>> Respect> Pradeep>> sohamsa , Sunil John suniljohn_2002@ wrote:> >> > OM Datta Guru> >> > Dear Members> >> > Pranam> >> > Does anyone has English or hindi translation of the Tibetan Version> of BPHS (Brihat Parasara Hora Shastra)> >> > The reason I ask is that a friend of mine met the Dalai Lama a year> back and when Sri Dalai Lama saw his chart he started discussing itand> then explained few things with the outer planets (Uranus PlutoNeptune).> Friend interrupted the Spiritual Leader and said that this is notvedic> astrology as in vedic astrology outer planets are not mentioned. Upon> this Dalai Lama mentioned that the Version of BPHS they have in that> Sage Parasara has clearly mentioned Outer Planets.> >> > I personally think that a person of the calibre of Dalai Lama would> not lie about the outer planets & if this BPHS version is true then it> might prove often what some nadi texts have said about Outer planets & > their usage.> >> > It seems the Tibetans guard their astrology texts very sacredly & > hence maybe so far an English version so far has not come out nor any> book on Kalachakra Dasa from their corner of the world though many> elders acknowledge that the real secrets of KCD are with the Tibetans.> It is also said that during the mughal invasion of India, many> manuscripts of ours were carried to Tibet via the Afghanistan route & > have never come back.> >> > Maybe some of you are into Tibetan astrology & might possess a> private english work of the translation of their BPHS or might know> Tibetan astrology pls mail me privately on suniljohn_2002@ shall be> indebted.> >> > Love & Light,> >> >> > Sunil John> > Mumbai> >> >> > > > New Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PCand> save big.> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Dear Rohini ji In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? what do you think? regards santhosh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 please take a moment to read astrotreasures lost over time article on boloji.com/astro Also note that some people think that Parashara meant Balbhadra and not Gautam Buddha! RR , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10 wrote: > > > Dear Rohini ji > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > what do you think? > > regards > santhosh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dear Santosh, People who are ardent followers of BPHS opine that the Buddha meant there is not Gautama Buddha. The Buddha referred here is believed to be the incarnation of Vishnu avatara and his birth dates about 1500 BC according to a vaishnavite Brahmin astrologer Chiraan who runs an astrology website. Interestingly,you can see that the story of Saptagiri Srinivasa venkatesa Perumal of Tirupathi Mentioned in the Puranas . But the actual avatara took place recently about 3000 years ago and this finds mention in the puranas which were written before the avatar took place. Another Interesting point -There is no planet to represent the upcoming KalKi avatar in those verses. Thanks and best wishes vishnu , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10 wrote: > > > Dear Rohini ji > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > what do you think? > > regards > santhosh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Thanks Rohiniji, thats a thought provoking article, although the name of the article is just opposite of what you have suggested below. It did answer my doubt... regards santhosh  ________________________________ rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani Wed, 30 December, 2009 9:53:47 PM Re: BPHS  please take a moment to read astrotreasures lost over time article on boloji.com/astro Also note that some people think that Parashara meant Balbhadra and not Gautam Buddha! RR , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10@ ...> wrote: > > > Dear Rohini ji > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > what do you think? > > regards > santhosh > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. http://in./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 I was hoping you would notice, Santhosh! ;-) LOST was what was in my original submission but the more 'here-and-now-saavy' editor of the hard-copy submission earlier thought that the title should be changed into something more 'positive'! Not being rigid and saturnine, really, I succumbed as long as they let me keep my message in the BODY TEXT, intact! Who notices the TITLE and HEADER anyway? Of course you proved me wrong, publicly, and I am glad that you noticed! I chose to keep the title unchanged when my article was re-published in the cyber-reality! Thank you for paying attention! Rohiniranjan , Santhosh <santhosh10 wrote: > > Thanks Rohiniji, > thats a thought provoking article, although the name of the article is just opposite of what you have suggested below. It did answer my doubt... > > regards > santhosh > > Â > > > > ________________________________ > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani > > Wed, 30 December, 2009 9:53:47 PM > Re: BPHS > > Â > please take a moment to read astrotreasures lost over time article on boloji.com/astro > > Also note that some people think that Parashara meant Balbhadra and not Gautam Buddha! > > RR > > , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini ji > > > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > > > what do you think? > > > > regards > > santhosh > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. http://in./ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Thanks again rohini ji, for seeing it as a positive quality. many would disagree with you. I am an auditor and this means i look to see differences (some say 'mistakes')...further my past positions in certain investigation functions means that i try to find what is amiss...now this is all ok but the problem comes when it enters the social interaction arena...you see...this nature makes me overly critical as i tend to notice problems, differences, mistakes, errors etc..so you can imagine the rest!!! now i have overcome most of these 'problems'..am talking of the past...am glad the basic quality is still with me and i am able to use it in a positive way. regards and thanks santhosh  ________________________________ rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani Thu, 31 December, 2009 12:31:52 PM Re: BPHS  I was hoping you would notice, Santhosh! ;-) LOST was what was in my original submission but the more 'here-and-now- saavy' editor of the hard-copy submission earlier thought that the title should be changed into something more 'positive'! Not being rigid and saturnine, really, I succumbed as long as they let me keep my message in the BODY TEXT, intact! Who notices the TITLE and HEADER anyway? Of course you proved me wrong, publicly, and I am glad that you noticed! I chose to keep the title unchanged when my article was re-published in the cyber-reality! Thank you for paying attention! Rohiniranjan , Santhosh <santhosh10@ ...> wrote: > > Thanks Rohiniji, > thats a thought provoking article, although the name of the article is just opposite of what you have suggested below. It did answer my doubt... > > regards > santhosh > >  > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...> > > Wed, 30 December, 2009 9:53:47 PM > Re: BPHS > >  > please take a moment to read astrotreasures lost over time article on boloji.com/astro > > Also note that some people think that Parashara meant Balbhadra and not Gautam Buddha! > > RR > > , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini ji > > > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > > > what do you think? > > > > regards > > santhosh > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. http://in.. com/ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Santhosh_ji, I cannot but see reality, otherwise! You see -- in some senses, I am an auditor too! And an editor, in addition, as luck would have it! The two responsibilities allow me to separate words from meanings! The " stated " from the 'intended!' Ultimately, it is about communicating the meaningful, whether we are auditors or editors! FOR neither of us, auditors or editors, are GODS! ;-) RR-, , Santhosh <santhosh10 wrote: > > Thanks again rohini ji, for seeing it as a positive quality. > many would disagree with you. > I am an auditor and this means i look to see differences (some say 'mistakes')...further my past positions in certain investigation functions means that i try to find what is amiss...now this is all ok but the problem comes when it enters the social interaction arena...you see...this nature makes me overly critical as i tend to notice problems, differences, mistakes, errors etc..so you can imagine the rest!!! > now i have overcome most of these 'problems'..am talking of the past...am glad the basic quality is still with me and i am able to use it in a positive way. > > regards and thanks > santhosh > >  > > > > ________________________________ > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani > > Thu, 31 December, 2009 12:31:52 PM > Re: BPHS > >  > I was hoping you would notice, Santhosh! ;-) > > LOST was what was in my original submission but the more 'here-and-now- saavy' editor of the hard-copy submission earlier thought that the title should be changed into something more 'positive'! > > Not being rigid and saturnine, really, I succumbed as long as they let me keep my message in the BODY TEXT, intact! Who notices the TITLE and HEADER anyway? Of course you proved me wrong, publicly, and I am glad that you noticed! > > I chose to keep the title unchanged when my article was re-published in the cyber-reality! > > Thank you for paying attention! > > Rohiniranjan > > , Santhosh <santhosh10@ ...> wrote: > > > > Thanks Rohiniji, > > thats a thought provoking article, although the name of the article is just opposite of what you have suggested below. It did answer my doubt... > > > > regards > > santhosh > > > >  > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > rohinicrystal <jyotish_vani@ ...> > > > > Wed, 30 December, 2009 9:53:47 PM > > Re: BPHS > > > >  > > please take a moment to read astrotreasures lost over time article on boloji.com/astro > > > > Also note that some people think that Parashara meant Balbhadra and not Gautam Buddha! > > > > RR > > > > , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Rohini ji > > > > > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > > > > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > > > > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > > > > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > > > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > > > > > what do you think? > > > > > > regards > > > santhosh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. http://in.. com/ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 Dear Vishnu_ji, I hope to God that people stop beating around the bush and acquire the strength to be direct! Instead of 'pussy-footing' around, if you are familiar with that expression! I personally think that pussy-footing was created by and for those who had never met a real Kitten/CAT! Given the love and respect that MA's vahan deserves, SHE returns back love and even has the gumption to look after her fallen brother -- the pit-bull terrier a breed of dogs that has been declared dangerous by Human Beings and the law decrees that any that are born must be killed! Pit-Bulls, in other words have been decreed by human war-lords to be more dangerous than tigers and lions and such other wild animals! I am not an ardent follower of BPHS (Astrotreasures article!)! Gautam Buddha does not need our puny endorsement! Dr. Deepak Chopra has written a best-seller on Siddhartha! I am surprised that you are not already throwing up yourself in some form of epiphany! Did you know that Dr. Chopra named his son, Gautam? And he has written publicly about his personal anguish when he felt that he almost lost his cherished son! On 9/11! What did YOU lose on 9/11 Bisnu Bhagwaan? Pray tell...!! Climb out of your puny shell and face reality! There is a planet that represents Kalki Awatar! Even in those verses! But you must read the book (Chowkhambha) or books (Sharma edition) in order to figure that simple thing out! ;-) Rohiniranjan , " Vishnu " <vishnumohanalj wrote: > > Dear Santosh, > > > People who are ardent followers of BPHS opine that the Buddha meant there is not Gautama Buddha. > > > The Buddha referred here is believed to be the incarnation of Vishnu avatara and his birth dates about 1500 BC according to a vaishnavite Brahmin astrologer Chiraan who runs an astrology website. > > > Interestingly,you can see that the story of Saptagiri Srinivasa venkatesa Perumal of Tirupathi Mentioned in the Puranas . > > > But the actual avatara took place recently about 3000 years ago and this finds mention in the puranas which were written before the avatar took place. > > > Another Interesting point -There is no planet to represent the upcoming KalKi avatar in those verses. > > > > Thanks and best wishes > > vishnu > > > > , " santhosh10 " <santhosh10@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini ji > > > > In an earlier post you had advocated that let a student of astrology begin his learning by reading BPHS first and then he can get on with other classics. > > > > I began my learning with Brihat Jataka and Phaladeepika. Hence, taking a cue from you i decided to go through BPHS too. > > > > Chapter 2 Sloka 5-7:- From Surya the incarnation of Ram, from chandra that of krishna, from mangal that of narasimha, from budd that of budha, from Guru that of Vaman, from shukra that of parashuram, from sani that of kurma, from rahu that of varaha, from ketu that of meen occurred(past tense). all other incarnations other than these also are through the grahas.... > > > > this made me wonder...Sage Parashara was supposed to have been alive in 3000bc. the logic for this taken from the dating of mahabharata at around 2500bc, mahabharata was written by sage vasihta and sage parashara was his father.. > > Now. Buddha was born around 500bc, meaning much after sage parashara. hence, could the verse actually mean...from budd that of buddha will be incarnated (future tense) or could it be that this was subsequent addition into BPHS? > > > > what do you think? > > > > regards > > santhosh > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.